Probably best to wait until the partners are out of the hub.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.

was trying to think of a quip along those lines

OK well played

But we did it with Fev in the 2000s with some success IIRC. Maybe Teague & Carey are still mates from their North days, not sure.

_________________
#DonTheStash

You do realise that Teague was that person.

I'm a Cuningham fan, but his detractors are correct that his body doesn't hold up, he doesn't find enough ball, and as you point out, he's done it once this year against Bumbers*, which supports the point made about his lack of consistency.

His pace and skills are unquationably desirable.

I really thought this year was the year he makes the big step up, but this far, not to be.

I still have high hopes, but I'm not keen on gifting games. Maybe that's the position of the MC too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue

The time is now to strike. Now is the time. Fingers crossed.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue

Great post. Food for Thought.

Well thought out Don. I think you may be onto something.
After all they are a bunch of guys bought together over a 5 year period.
They didnt all come at the same time.
Covid hasn't helped our guys who needed to learn more about cohesion than Hawks, Pies you mention

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue

He teases.

As a small forward he doesn't hit the scoreboard quit enough. I know it's not all about goals every week but even still I think he needs to snag a few more as a small forward.

And as a midfielder he doesn't get it enough also.

Personally I would leave him in the middle for an extended run. Dusting him after 1 bad game is not the answer, though I get at that stage the coach was thinking finals and the need to win over the alternative of persisting with players in certain roles which carries some element of risk.

We have a very taxing game plan, we dominate but not good enough to put scoreboard pressure.

Hard to play at that intensity for 4 qtrs, it's inevitable the opposition will get a run on and then we are screwed.

I like to think that if we finally get rid of John Barker then everything will magically be alright.

But reality is that (in addition to Barker getting the arse...seriously FFS) we need some @#$%&! winners in that coaching box.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY

A good coach Should be able to see some things aren’t working and change them example is sps not playing well then move him don’t just leave him there till he has no confidence left a good example is Longmire with nick Blakey struggled to moved into defence

Starting to worry.
Watching the Freo kids and Sydney kids and, and, allowed to play midfield while ours are lining up as defensive forwards or even worse lockdown defenders, really, really, really has me concerned. Hope I’m wrong but watching our kids lack confidence to run and take the game on, is the final nail.

CARLTON’S COSTLY QUARTERS 2020

ROUND 3 v Geelong, Q4: -33 points

ROUND 2 v Melbourne, Q1: -32 points

ROUND 9 v Hawthorn, Q2: -32 points

ROUND 1 v Richmond, Q1: -31 points

ROUND 14 v Collingwood, Q4: -26 points

ROUND 15 v GWS Giants, Q4: -24 points

ROUND 11 v West Coast Eagles, Q3: -24 points

ROUND 5 v St Kilda, Q1: -20 points

ROUND 12 v Fremantle, Q1: -19 points

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah)

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.

That is absolutely damning.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY

Open the floodgates!

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.

The flip side is we out play sides for 3/4s, but don’t get the scoreboard reward of late.

We’re not far away. Build up our size in the kids, and we will see a difference.

Not sure what to think. Last night we generated 9 more inside 50s than a star studded midfield, and set up well behind the ball.

So what is it? Our midfield? Our forward line? The quality of ball delivered I50?

I don't think we're far off. It's just a couple of outsiders. Like someone posted last night....once we start losing the clearances like we did in the last quarter we get torched, hence the runs of goals.

Forward line with Charlie, and if we can land Papley, sorts itself out in my opinion.

_________________
"I had to eat"

Charlie keeps getting mentioned.
H has a rooted knee and hasn't played footy for two years. He will come back next year with a big doubt in his own mind as to whether he can stay un-injured.
He may not ever be able to jump like he could if the injured knee is on his take-off leg.
Even if he is OK, he will need a season to get his confidence back.
He is no guarantee.
Papley will cost too much.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)

Agree with that especially the Charlie part. We don't know if we will get the same athletic Charlie or a somewhat broken down Charlie. Or if he even makes it back at all.

Also agree we aren't far off. A couple of outside mids would be nice.
However, our problems run deeper than that. A couple of outside mids and a bit more class may help us get over some of these games against mid range opposition which we are currently dropping.
They wont though help us much against the top 4 in big games when the pressure cooker goes up to extreme levels.
The reason is our structures are all wrong. Our game plan appears to be too one dimensional. There is no plan b.
The way our mids deliver to our forwards is terrible. The was our forwards set up is terrible. Our goal kicking is terrible. The top teams will still break us until we fix these and we will ultimately fail.
Sheer class can only get you so far. Look at GWS. On paper have had the best list for the past 5 years but only have one grand final and a couple of prelims to show for it.
We also need to play our players to their strengths too. Has been said enough, but SPS is not a defender. He is a classy mid with quality ball use. Should be used further up the ground.
Whilst I'm not a Dow fan, he needs to play where he was drafted and at least be given an opportunity to succeed. Rather than being left to rot in the forward half. Maybe then he will get a bit more confidence in himself and show why he was so highly rated.
Yes Fisher has some qualities as a small forward, but he is another who is a mid first. He can go forward for a rest and shown that he can impact the scoreboard, but needs to spend more time in the middle.
Teague may bemoan the fact that we do not have enough insdie/outside mids, but those 3 mentioned are capable of playing that inside/outside mid role, yet he refuses to play them there.
I remember the Hughes/Rogers era where we'd draft flankers in the hope they develop into mids. Under SOS, we have drafted mids and are trying to turn them into flankers and at the same time bemoaning the lack of mids.
Makes no sense.