Sumo wrote:
I think you’ll find that I said I’d be happy with pride in the performance….which is a far cry from supporting a team with no heart, no professionalism & no ambition….but hey, don’t let that stop you from a good bagging.
Is it D grade, or is it Premier 1st X1……I’m not sure myself
Anyway……
So we have players who refuse to chase & train hard………….why are they still selected? Who’s fault is that…the match committee? The coach? Lets sack everybody
Let me get this straight, under the Synbad theory, in order to become a good side, we have to lose & get the early draft choices to get the guns (apparently you can’t get good players past selection 10). However, this will take more than 1 draft. Therefore, after we get the guns in the first year, we tell them to hold back so we can finish bottom the next year to get more guns, & the next, & the next. The problem is that in doing this, a defeatist attitude is instilled into the original guns drafted. After a couple of years, the guns haven’t improved, because we are tanking all the time, & now you’re calling for their heads & wanting to tank again. Thus creating a vicious cycle of mediocrity. What a grand plan.
Heres a theory……….maybe we should continue to develop the players we have, play to win & draft smart. Or is that too hard?
You have to come to terms with 2006 dont you?
You dont have your little milk bottles handed out to you at prep anymore...
What i want to know is do you still use pig skin on your scoop????
There is no deafetist attitude among kids cos theyre being defeated by the players that are there to be giving them a hand anyway..
If we had won one more game this year so you can feel all nice for a week.. but missed out on Murphy and had pick 5 not four would you feel clever????
Would you?????
Deafetist???... were losing anyway Sumo.... 2 years ago we actually won 10.. what did they take with them out of that season into last year??... where we came last and still had a shocking percentage.
What people like you dont get is.. you can still have victories and lose games of football... you can get games under kids belts.. you can teach kids to go about their footy in a correct manner.. you can have them enjoying their footy.. instead of playing a guy like Lance for example who wont take/ is uncapable of playing a lead role in a footy side.. theyre not gaining anything.. and he might.. help win an extra game or two...Big deal.. it makes no difference.....!!!!!! psyche wise... but if you get the extra couple of early players in the draft they can be drafted on talent and competitiveness... leadership.. sure you can have some later in the draft but why just rely on those when you get the best ones?????
But you lose Murphy and Kennedy and instead get say Dowler...
Or you lose Deledio/Franklin /Griffen but you get Russell/Hartlett...
Its all about the quality of footballer you get... the deafetist attitude is irrelevant because were being deafed anyway..
Or am i missing something sumo?????
Do you wear the St Peters cricket gloves????*interested*