jimmae wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
verbs wrote:
Everitt was nowhere until the last half of the last quarter. Lamb was significantly better.
Lamb was a solid contributor today.
Gorringe, Everitt, Walker and
Lamb were all shit. Coincidentally, they were all forwards.

Walker made the least effort to other aspects of play, and Lamb made the least attempts to pressure and made no intercepts, and yet we're talking about Everitt's inability to follow team rules before them.
Why don't we fix the midfield problem by dropping Walker and White for an injection of pace and skill?
If you think Lamb was shit, the bye can't come quick enough for you!!
And while I'm at it, how f#$%^ dumb were we today not positioning ourselves more on the outside of our opponents at centre bounces.
I just think we were 5% off our game and paid the price
I think it was Agro who made a comment earlier in the week about the 94 qualifying final against Geelong at Waverley. I was there that day. Today was the same attitude.
Winning today would've given us some short term gratification but nothing more. We should've beaten them.
Losing gives all an opportunity to evaluate and reflect with a view to improving practices/structures
etc.
And FFS...can we give Jacksh a go??
Well said 99, you can not compare Everitt's effort with Lamb. Lamb didn't dominate but his efforts and willingness to chase was so much more evident than Everitt's effort.
Our setup in the middle was terrible, too often the Saints mids were allowed to get on the attacking side roving to a dominant ruckman. Very little defensive structure around the clearances.
I really hope DVR, Buckley, Cunningham and Boekurst get a good run in the seniors. I think DVR and Boekhurst will be better suited to the better grounds where they can run and carry the ball.
Good lesson today, it really highlighted the fact we need more running midfielders before KPP's.