padre wrote:
Sigh....
Blue Vain wrote:
You're dreaming. It was a disaster by any measure.
Financially, it cost a mint to pay out the existing coaching panel and Mick was on top dollar.
Then he bought in his underperforming mates on top dollar.
He was happy to preach unity and a team first mentality but once again he put his own interests before the clubs when his time was up.
As for installing leadership and accountability, I'm unsure if you're taking the piss or you really believe that nonsense. He refused to implement leadership programs and refused external assistance to develop leadership.
There was no change in culture, just more of the unaccountable, selfish, insular crap the club had specialised in for years. If anything, his selfish ways reinforced the behaviours we were all bemoaning.
I'm happy to look to the future but please, spare me the twisted reflections. He's a very average individual and the best decision our club made in 20 years was to toss him out on his arse.
Talk to the players now and with the short exposure to Boltons coaching, they realise how much they have to catch up in tactics, strategies, professionalism and football knowledge.
There's not enough hours in the day.
Basically all you are doing here is stating opinion after opinion as fact. Why should i debate your opinion. You are entitled to it, as i am.
I will stand corrected if you can state some facts and back them up , but to merely state that his assistants were underperforming and overpaid, is a qualitative assessment. There is no quantitative measurement here . Ie facts. Just opinion.
You say he put his own interests before the club. That is opinion. Not fact.
He refused leadership programs. He refused to external assistance? Lol. Who was running the club? Weren't they meant to implement them? Dont blame mick for that.
You say that there was no change in culture. I say it started to change from a very low base. It pissed off a few selfish players and they left. Waite robinson garlett etc. Your opinion v my opinion.
His selfish ways reinforced the behaviour.... Again your opinion. Not fact.
You state he is a very average individual. Your opinion. Not fact.
The only apparent fact albeit unsubstantiated is your private chat to a few unspecified players, that they realise how much they need to catch up....
Who are these players? Back up your facts with some names and i will believe you otherwise its just speculation as to what the players" believe"
There you go, I fixed up the quotes for you so it's resembling something readable.
That's fantastic. You've read my post and disputed some of the comments made. I would have thought thats what these fansites are about.
Your proposition that someone posts something and it can't be disputed because it's only opinion would be rather boring wouldn't it? Someone starts a thread with an opinion and no one can follow it up if they disagree. Boring.
Mind you, your comments about it being my opinion and not fact is correct. Nowhere have a stated it's fact.
Lets go back over some of your responses. Firstly leadership programs.
Padre wrote:
He refused leadership programs. He refused to external assistance? Lol. Who was running the club? Weren't they meant to implement them? Dont blame mick for that.
The club had implemented them and your hero kicked them out. And then he had the stupidity to bemoan the lack of leadership within the playing group.
Quote:
Chris Judd and not captain Marc Murphy addressed the media, symbolising Murphy's struggle in the captaincy role and the on-field leadership void. One of the innovations Malthouse removed when he came on board was the Leading Teams program.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/m ... z3wXGquMsU Quote:
How about a quote from one of the game's great experienced leaders, Mick Malthouse? "I hate it. I think it's degrading," he said about Leading Teams.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/l ... 6062298581As for putting his own interests before the clubs. How else could you describe his efforts on radio the day before he was sacked or his efforts on the Footy Show on the eve of the 2011 final series.
What about Mick putting his contract status into the media last year stating the uncertainty will effect the players. This is before a ball was kicked in anger.
Anyone who doesn't see that as putting his own interests first is kidding themselves.
Once again opinions but the provoke discussion and debate.
With regard to the players realising how much they have to catch up and learn. Read their comments on the website. Not only the coach but the players are telling how much time they are spending learning and the huge hours they are investing before the season commences. Hardly disputable.
Once again thoughts and opinions that provoke discussion and debate.
Unlike your good self who refuses to discuss his opinions and labels anyone who questions his view as haters and impartial.
That's what I labelled as shit and I stand by it. Not your views. I think they're misguided and myopic but I'm happy to debate them and hopefully you can sway my opinion but you refuse to do it. You rather put up the shutters and dismiss anyone else views.
If you want respect, try some accountability first.