King Kenny wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Yet another record-breaking loss...and you can hear crickets at the AFL head office.
Not our concern says the AFL...now imagine if that same club that is receiving the hidings was Brisbane, North Melbourne or Port Adelaide. Heaven forbid.
I am thinking the AFL's response in "assistance" would be marginally (eh-hem) different.
I can't wait to see what package the AFL has to put together at the end of this year to "rescue" Brisbane.
Forget the AFL, it's not their problem, Carlton got themselves into this mess, they can get themselves out of it the right way.
It's people with a negative mindset who Paul Roos slammed at Melbourne. This website is the same at times.
Tell me. How are Carltons problems going to be solved by going to the AFL for a rescue package?
Well I would start with the AFL paying off Carlton's debt. Did the AFL just get a 2.5 billion tv deal? I wonder where they will put that money...you can bet your bottom dollar it won't be to assisting Carlton.
Why WAS North Melbourne's 6 million dollar debt (now paid off by the AFL with special dividends) a priority for the AFL and yet Carlton's six million debt is irrelevant.
I will tell you why...because Carlton is seen as being " a rich club".. yet.that was 30 years ago. Carlton needs assistance- financial, moral, intellectual, physical etc - from the AFL...and for the AFL to stop treating them as " a rich club".
Another example was the membership drive at the beginning of this year. Carlton didn't have enough money to man the phones...now whose fault is that you are saying? Carlton's obviously I hear you saying. How many memberships did Carlton miss out on?
Yet just imagine without a six million dollar debt somehow Carlton would have found the funds to man the phones.
These are just examples. Recruiting... how many scouts do Carlton have compared to Hawthorn I wonder?
Which club is the richer again...i forgot.
Yes that staggering sense of entitlement, the welfare cancer that has eaten the heart out of Australia. When in trouble it is someone else's strategy and while we are at it kick the Pratt's off the board.