Mickstar wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
It could be argued that the appointment of the recruitment manager is more important than the new coach whoever that may be................... jungle drums are beating out west that we are going gangbusters for Simon Dalrymple.Thats what those in the know out there are saying.Would be a good get for mine.
"Let's just copy the Bulldogs"
Just sayin' what there sayin' .
No doubt Mick, not a slight on you at all.

Sydney Blue wrote:
How do you know Barker was shit . he may have been sitting in the background nashing his teeth following instructions.
He might have learnt not what to do as a senior coach
This is the clear counter-argument, but that just gives us 'Barker the good bloke', 'Barker the yes man', 'No opinion Barker', 'Barker the self-serving', 'Barker the spineless'.
The public face of his time at the club is not great, and it's a tremendously bold move to make him run things now.
AGRO's sous chef analogy is a decent take, but a professional kitchen is a much more compressed and egotistical environment than even a football club; Barker has had years to be able to find his feet and breathe, and it's pretty clear his philosophy on football hasn't been drastically different from those he's worked with, but that says a lot about football more than Barker.
We certainly don't have enough information to make this call, but if you could quantify such things, Barker would want to be able to produce something at least 5% better than the other candidates because the supporters are going to quick to turn up the heat if the results aren't evident.