The Rhino wrote:
jimmae wrote:
In fact, Hendo probably wouldn't use all the TPP increase: it's just shy of 300k. That's probably Hendo, Curnow and Armfield paid for. We could sign a guy like Carlisle with plenty of room to spare.
That said, if we get a chance to shift one or two of Jones, Rowe, White or Casboult we really should take it. All of this assumes Carlisle isn't banned or banned for more than 6 months. I'd keep Jamison, because he can play FB or third tall and be an asset, where as the rest struggle to play more than one role. Fingers crossed on Giles and Foster though.
If we could shift two, would we also look at someone like Jarrad Grant? Obviously not a KPP, but is quick, kicks goals and creates a mismatch while being composed with the football. Probably what we were hoping to get out of Jones.
I'm not saying that. Not a matter whether we have the space, rather whether it's counterproductive in bringing in Carlisle, despite all signs from the club pointing to an imbalanced playing list, both in structure and what they're being paid.
I'd rather Jarrad Grant than Watts. Cheaper if nothing else. Surely third time lucky on Dog duds.
Given Garlisle is 23, I'm not sure it's counter-productive at all; Jamison will probably retire or last maybe one more year than his contract, which leaves us looking over at Jaksch, Foster, Giles and Fields unless we get Weitering/Scache and another talented tall.
Carlisle and Henderson insure us against the floor dropping out on us. The trick is - assuming they don't go up a level in output - to move on all of Casboult, White, Rowe & Jones by the end of 2017, and to have them replaced in the line up by the end of 2016. Jones is done with, White is next (via Giles/Jaksch/Fields), Rowe can be pushed out by Carlisle.
RE: Grant, he is clearly more talented than Jones or Tutt, so perhaps his wage may be an issue, but it it will be difficult for the Dogs to foot the bill also. 300k would be a little steep for us.