No quick fixes=no stupid trades

SurreyBlue · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am **Posts:** 10557

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

moshe25 · **Joined:** Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 11671

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Yep, I agree.

teagueyubeauty · **Joined:** Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am **Posts:** 6450

Reckon we would have gone very close, if not take it, in 2011 with Fev in the team.

Alas, we never got to see Fev antics post premiership...... Would have been an interesting ride!!!!

camel · **Posted:** Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:00 pm

That's what she said.

Stranger · **Joined:** Sun Apr 12, 2015 11:18 am **Posts:** 262

There was nothing wrong with the Judd trade it was the years after that
where it all went wrong.

Big Kahuna Boot · **Posted:** Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:41 pm

..no quick fixes also means no fire sale just for the sake of getting extra picks.. ..if you're not getting top fifteen picks, seriously reassess..

malbi · **Posted:** Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:51 am

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Rubbish.

scottopee · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am **Posts:** 1724

malleefowl wrote:

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Rubbish.

Yep rubbish. Kennedy wanted to stay and I'm sure we would have picked someone else instead of Masten as he was a WA pick.

moshe25 · **Joined:** Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 11671

scottopee wrote:

malleefowl wrote:

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Rubbish.

Yep rubbish. Kennedy wanted to stay and I'm sure we would have picked someone else instead of Masten as he was a WA pick.

Yep. Just looking at that draft - gees it was strong.

We would've picked Cale Morton, Kennedy would've gone home first chance he got being sick of getting Fev's knees on the back of his head.

So instead of Kreuzer, Judd and Armfield, we would've got Kreuzer, who's always out injured.

scottopee · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am **Posts:** 1724

moshe25 wrote:

scottopee wrote:

malleefowl wrote:

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Rubbish.

Yep rubbish. Kennedy wanted to stay and I'm sure we would have picked someone else instead of Masten as he was a WA pick.

Yep. Just looking at that draft - gees it was strong.

We would've picked Cale Morton, Kennedy would've gone home first chance he got being sick of getting Fev's knees on the back of his head.

So instead of Kreuzer, Judd and Armfield, we would've got Kreuzer, who's always out injured.

Ohh ok Kennedy would have been a free agent and we would have lost him for nothing :roll:

Yes it was a very week draft but Lachie Henderson, Dangerfield and Rioli were available yes we have a poor history of drafting but we might have got one right. Would prefer to currently have Kreuzer Kennedy and Dangerfield then any combo with Judd.

moshe25 · **Joined:** Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 11671

scottopee wrote:

moshe25 wrote:

scottopee wrote:

malleefowl wrote:

SurreyBlue wrote:

If we didn't trade for Judd and kept Kennedy and say Masten, neither would be with us now.
We would have moved them on, probably for nil return because it would have been to hard to develop them anyhow. Simple.

Rubbish.

Yep rubbish. Kennedy wanted to stay and I'm sure we would have picked someone else instead of Masten as he was a WA pick.

Yep. Just looking at that draft - gees it was strong.

We would've picked Cale Morton, Kennedy would've gone home first chance he got being sick of getting Fev's knees on the back of his head.

So instead of Kreuzer, Judd and Armfield, we would've got Kreuzer, who's always out injured.

Ohh ok Kennedy would have been a free agent and we would have lost him for nothing :roll:

Yes it was a very week draft but Lachie Henderson, Dangerfield and Rioli were available yes we have a poor history of drafting but we might have got one right. Would prefer to currently have Kreuzer Kennedy and Dangerfield then any combo with Judd.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but it was far from a weak draft.

Kreuzer, Cotchin, Masten, Myers, Palmer, Henderson, McEvoy, Dangerfield, Rioli, Ebert, Taylor, Rance, Ward, S. Selwood - all in first 22.

We would've picked Morton or Veszpremi. Or McEvoy, and then swapped him to hawthorn for Schoenmakers.

Goltzenberg · **Posted:** Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:29 pm

Lets hire fev. Membership boost and will be our best forward. Hendo gone. Whynot

dane · **Joined:** Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am **Posts:** 22357

Goltzenberg wrote:

Lets hire fev. Membership boost and will be our best forward. Hendo gone. Whynot

I'd find this funny if I was sure you weren't serious.

The Rhino · **Joined:** Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm **Posts:** 6923

I'll reserve judgement till a rally occurs.

Goltzenberg · **Posted:** Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:02 pm

Start the rally *march*

No quick fixes=no stupid trades

Who is online