cecil89 wrote:
What are the mixed messages people are hearing from the club? I'd say there's a lack of detail, but I'm not getting mixed messages.
-We have a poor list and are rebuilding.
-Rebuilding doesn't have to mean constant losses. The club still want Mick to aim for wins each time we run out onto the field.
-Malthouse will see out his contract.
These are about the only messages I've heard from the club, and while some people might be confused by the statement that we're rebuilding but the expectation that we aim to win each weekend too, if you can tell the difference between rebuilding and tanking it shouldn't be that hard to understand.
I get the feeling they know they need to bottom out but we are in such a perilous financial predicament they dont want the stigma of 'bottoming out' to leak and affect sales so ..... they concoct some weird kind of smokescreen that is easily seen through by all and sundry. When the flawed statements are called out the resulting damage control is a partial admission that we are rebuilding without bottoming out. The scramble to protect the compromised cover story by adding another confusing cover story seems very 1970's and most see through it immediately, the press starts pulling it apart.
Now we are in no-mans land. It seems like one of those situations where everyone can prove that technically they are right.....but you still feel screwed over regardless.
My only hope is that this nothing we seem to be in is buying us time for a real plan that is playing out in the background. I wont hold my breath.