Pickle wrote:
John James wrote:
He can't stop talking about his time at Collingwood on 3AW. He is here for the wrong reasons.
What about the discussion on the 2013 draft - he had no idea apart from Cripps who we actually picked?? I'm sorry but this guy is supposed to be full time isn't he???
Let me fill you in Mick - Giles and Holman and not sure who after that. And have those two even played one game yet??
Given that Giles & Holman have 1 AFL game between them, and Giles has spent most of his time at the CFC on the LTI list, can you blame him? Holman is not a memorable face in every sense of the phrase.
These are silly things, but I understand why people can consider them glib or callous, and try and reflect that back on Mick personally. I'd imagine Mick has a lot on his mind right now and his focus, like that of every player at the club, would be a bit all over the shop at the moment.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
John James wrote:
jimmae wrote:
John James wrote:
Which teams these days play two rucks with the sub rule?
Answered this in the post-match thread: West Coast play NicNat and Lycett, but you've got Kennedy up forward and NicNat in that scenario.
Lycett got dropped this week.
Unless you have a significant bow to your game, you can't play two rucks that are the same player. Nic Nat is a freak and is the most mobile ruckman there is, he hasn't been successful with Lycett as a pair.
Has Nic Nat officially taken a mark this year yet? He hadn't after the first 3 rounds.
Incredibly overrated
NicNat may not be taking grabs, but his run and spread and the opportunities and pressure that creates are exceptional for a player of his stature. He's about to hit his prime years, and I think he'll average 18-20 possessions a game doing what he does. If he manages to take some marks then he's going to have a huge influence on contests.
Averaging 32 hitouts a game this season.