club29 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
I was so amped for this game, then reality set in when we announced the team last night.
it's not until you look at our interchange bench that it really dawns on me, we have too many plodders picked. some foot speed and run & carry & a little elusiveness would have balanced the team out, imo. Buckley and boekhurst to maybe make way for a few of the plodders, maybe?
... for me, bell, curnow, carrots and cripps is too much replication at the expense of a dynamic runner who can break lines and take the game on. even our blue chip mids, murphy & gibbs aren't really run & carry outside players.
we're kinda once again relying on Judd to do this from the middle at 38 years of age or whatever he is. other than yarran and maybe daisy there's not too many foot races we'll win on the big surface tonight.
makes our gameplan and structures from Mick, and hunger and want from the players to be at a premium tonight to have any chance.
Mick has always had teams of plodders. Makes it easier to hold shape and manage the performance.
Little fat guys that run all day and know how to find the football ahead of flashy fast guys that run out of puff after cheating off the pack a few times.
I wouldn't look at our team the way we use to. Look for 22 even performances. Quarter to quarter. Game to game.
..yep, agree fully with club29.. .... ..also, i wouldn't sell our team's run and carry short.. ..run and carry types with some good turn of pace.. ..touhy, simmo, doc, DT, Murphy, Judd, yarran will all run and carry the ball..