Cazzesman wrote:
keogh wrote:
1. Kreuzer despite the injuries was a bad selection pick 1
2. Hampson was a shocker at pick 17
3. Warnock was recruited because of this bullshit reputation he had
1. Why? Did you ever see him play in TAC, AIS or for Vic Metro. Tell us what you know of him at 18 not what you have read elsewhere.
2. That's interesting because both Collingwood and the Hawks were into him in a big way. The Hawks ended up with Renouf instead.
3. Warnock was recruited because he was young and it was thought his best football was still ahead of him. The fact Freo didn't want to let him go would suggest they thought the same thing.
Lets face it Keogh. Your knowledge is based on what you read on the back page of the newspaper or on bigfooty. Your hindsight is never-ending drivel.
Regards CazzesmanGarbage
I know what I am talking about.
You pass off someone's point of view because they are just an observer
Watching Jacobs in his first few games I could see he had a bright future more than Kreuzer, Hampson and Warnock
You and I can disagree but the facts are I am right if you look at what has transpired
I was at Avalon oval that night where Warnock was shit and Jacobs played well in the seniors yet got dropped for Warnock
How would you feel if the same thing happened to in relation to your position at the club
Jacobs was treated unfairly. Warnock is on bigger money and a bigger reputation so the club plays him so they don't look stupid.
Your arrogance and lack of willingness to say the club has [REDACTED] is one of the main reasons we are an average club
Looking into the future the club should be looking at future senior coach for 2016 now in case we falter again under MM
Are we
You do work there
We should be
That's what successful clubs do they do things properly
If your the prototype of person who is employed by the. Club who refuse to listen to facts and commonsense no wonder we have been average for 15 years