padre wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
padre wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
Dominator_7"
Yeah great answer
[quote="Blue Vain wrote:
As someone said the other day, if Mick doesn't want his antics shown on the big screen or TV, no worries. Just forsake the 400k the club receives for coaches box advertising out off his own pay packet.
Easy.
Yeah i agree Dom, that is a great answer from BV. Basically Mick's weakness is an incapacity for genuine self reflection and self criticism and honesty, and a nasty arrogance towards people who "haven't played the game". For all his strengths as a coach they are serious character flaws, he has never addressed them, never acknowledged them and never will.
You might be right, but imo that is what makes him a great coach. He gets a team of players together that want to play for him. Say what you like but mick is a fantastic mentor of young men, and if you take the time to wade through the plethora of sensationalistic video bites portraying him as a tyrant, what you see is a genuinely good bloke. Dont give me that garbage pertaining to his playing days at richmond.
Please. A great mentor of young men?
He refuses to take responsibility for his actions and when he is caught out, he attempts to lie his way out of it so spare me the great mentor bullshit.
Yes he has been a good coach but save the character fabrications for someone else. If I want someone to be a role model to our players, he's one of the last people I'd want.
You just choose to overlook it in the hope he'll bring success to your footy club where I believe the possible reward isn't worth the compromise.
Speak to players he has coached
Like who? Alan Didak? Heath Shaw?
Quality players but also well known for lying to extricate themselves from situations they created with poor behaviour.
They had a great mentor for that as well didn't they?
I have no doubt many players like playing footy under Mick and many of them enjoy his company. But you don't just hire a football coach. You hire a person to represent your club with all their good traits and their poor ones.
So if you're willing to overlook Micks past and recent history of losing control and then lying to extricate himself or pretend it didn't happen, that's fine. I'm not.
Let him keep coaching, I don't give a rats arse but spare me the great mentor/great man bullshit. Mick is a very average human being and his past couple of weeks have only reinforced that.
His employment is symptomatic of what our club has become. Our recent history (30 years) clearly demonstrates that when it comes to achieving success, lying, cheating, any type of behaviour is acceptable. We're willing to overlook or brush under the carpet any type of behaviour if it takes us one centimetre closer to a cup.
All this thread has shown is it's become ingrained into the supporters as well. Great mentor my arse.