Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:41 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:09 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Scotty12000 wrote:
Cretylus, can you categorically right now state whether you will or won't produce the statistics related to the past 6 years of comparative drafting between Carlton and Port Adelaide? The first 400 times you were asked and didn't address it I thought you may have just missed the request...now I'm starting to think there may be some mental deficiency (in addition to those already known) which render you unable to see those words in combination together.

Will you or won't you produce the statistics? It's a yes or no answer. I'm sick of Synbad asking you, I'm sick of you squibbing the response and I'm sick of you trotting out the same tiny tidbit stat and windbagging "ladies and gentleman" crap. Every longwinded post you make is wasted words that could be producing something more beneficial to proving your point.

Will you do it? YES/NO. Simple.


Everybody knows and understands the drafting record of our club - and the problems existed way before even Wayne Brittain,

Player Development, strong leadership, a club culture of honesty, workrate etc - everybody knows the jargon. We use to have it. We lost it....

I don't blame Ratts or Sticks or this person or Oligarchs on boards for our current state. And I don't blame Mick either. Its very much a club issue. I do like comparison though - and the Hinkley/Malthouse comparison is a very interesting one don't you think?

Take up your frustration with Mr S if you think that Ratts destroyed the club.

Remember Laidler is a prime example of a Ratts recruit that leaves, and is instantly a regular starter in a team that Mick has said has the best list depth EVER in the history of the game - what does that tell you?

(incidentally, I wont be annoyed if you don't answer or respond to my questions or posts - The Great Cretylus-Synbad polemic will continue ladies and gentlemen)

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:43 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1862
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Cretylus wrote:
Scotty12000 wrote:
Cretylus, can you categorically right now state whether you will or won't produce the statistics related to the past 6 years of comparative drafting between Carlton and Port Adelaide? The first 400 times you were asked and didn't address it I thought you may have just missed the request...now I'm starting to think there may be some mental deficiency (in addition to those already known) which render you unable to see those words in combination together.

Will you or won't you produce the statistics? It's a yes or no answer. I'm sick of Synbad asking you, I'm sick of you squibbing the response and I'm sick of you trotting out the same tiny tidbit stat and windbagging "ladies and gentleman" crap. Every longwinded post you make is wasted words that could be producing something more beneficial to proving your point.

Will you do it? YES/NO. Simple.


Everybody knows and understands the drafting record of our club - and the problems existed way before even Wayne Brittain,

Player Development, strong leadership, a club culture of honesty, workrate etc - everybody knows the jargon. We use to have it. We lost it....

I don't blame Ratts or Sticks or this person or Oligarchs on boards for our current state. And I don't blame Mick either. Its very much a club issue. I do like comparison though - and the Hinkley/Malthouse comparison is a very interesting one don't you think?

Take up your frustration with Mr S if you think that Ratts destroyed the club.

Remember Laidler is a prime example of a Ratts recruit that leaves, and is instantly a regular starter in a team that Mick has said has the best list depth EVER in the history of the game - what does that tell you?

(incidentally, I wont be annoyed if you don't answer or respond to my questions or posts - The Great Cretylus-Synbad polemic will continue ladies and gentlemen)

That's a no, gotcha. I don't need to talk to Synbad because you choose to deflect.

What does Laidler getting a run in the Swans backline as third banana tell me after being cut from Carlton for not being up to it? It tells me when premiership defender Alex Johnson returns from LTI that the stopgap Laidler will be cast to the 2s for the remainder of his time at the Swans unless he wants to find a fourth club.

You like stats...how'd he go tonight? 9 touches, no impact. It's easy for a player in the bottom six (probably bottom 2) of the 2012 premiership team, a team a game clear on top of the ladder coming off 12 straight wins, to be hidden and hidden well.

Laidler is the scraping of their backline barrel, a stopgap and nothing more, and we were right to cut him. The difference between Sydney and Carlton is that they have 19/22 guns on the field with reasonable depth and development...we have 5/22 at best, and even they are flaky. We simply don't have the team to carry a Laidler, and I can't see him doing any better than a Rowe or White at this point in time...he's certainly not doing better than that for Sydney.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Sydney hiding Laidler by playing him every week? You having a laugh?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1862
Location: Brisbane, QLD
verbs wrote:
Sydney hiding Laidler by playing him every week? You having a laugh?

Playing every week he might be Verbs, but at what impact? Would his performance (or lack thereof) be more or less obvious at Carlton right now? When I say hidden, I mean to say his deficiencies and his lack of impact on the game are insulated by the breadth of talent on the field already. He's very rarely isolated at Sydney either - their structure effectively 'hides' him.

Where does he rank out of their back 6 Verbs?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:14 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
For a serious, a very serious premiership threat, to play someone week in week out would indicate he ranks pretty bloody highly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:33 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1862
Location: Brisbane, QLD
I just don't think they have anyone in reserves right now that can get 10 touches to Laidler's 9. That doesn't mean they have a depth crisis like we do, it just means that 1 out of their 22 is a little questionable but with the structure and talent they have, it ain't no thang. We've got over half that 22 questionable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:37 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
They must have a serious depth crisis if they are only playing Laidler because there is no one else good enough. You are having a laugh. Carry on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:40 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1862
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Tell me how amazing he's been this season - really burning down the house right? If you're gonna come in and play second fiddle to Cretylus, at least bring more than "he must be good if he's playing every week in a premiership side."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
I don't know what you mean by playing second fiddle. I don't have to prove anything. Laidler is playing every week for currently the best side going around. He'd walk straight into our side without a problem if the coach hadn't written him off. He's doing for Sydney what he did for us in 2011. Nothing spectacular but playing his role week in week out and contributing to a winning team. It's pretty simple really. If he was so shit, he'd be playing in the reserves. Since he's not shit, with a bit if luck he'll have a premiership medallion, and he'll have Mighty Mick to thank for that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 8:21 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18079
Scotty12000 wrote:
I just don't think they have anyone in reserves right now that can get 10 touches to Laidler's 9. That doesn't mean they have a depth crisis like we do, it just means that 1 out of their 22 is a little questionable but with the structure and talent they have, it ain't no thang. We've got over half that 22 questionable.




Laidler is a permanent fixture in the premiership favourites backline. A team that has won 12 in a row.
A team that according to Malthouse has 17 or 18 players that would get a game with most other sides.


You're taking the piss surely. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Players don't get along with coaches at times. It happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I think Longmire is trolling us.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Maybe we should thank MM.

Who knows how many flags the Pies might have won if he hadn't been coach. :razz:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Effes wrote:
Are we just dismissing Laidler's comments or is there some truth to it?

Here's what he said FWIW

viewtopic.php?p=1563669#p1563669

"A gameplan they can't excel with"

Pagan era stuff...

Of course the list isn't in premiership shape but they are some very interesting comments from Laidler.


There'll be a grain of truth to it but dumped players aren't known for their objectivity. See Beaumont and his "scientific" brick curling.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I still feel MM should see out until the end of his contract because:
a) I don't want to see another $1M pissed away from sacking a coach
b) I want the club to put talented people around Mick instead of the ship of fools there now. Mick's a damn good coach, but it was typical CFC short-sightedness to think that just adding him to that crew would change anything.
c) MM's clearly been a good mentor over the years, and a smart club would've set up a natural successor the instant they signed him. But not us. And shame on us for throwing shitloads of money at one person rather than shoring up our entire coaching dept.

Too much of the previous regime still exists to blame MM alone. He was hamstrung from the start and never had what he had at Collingwood. Give him some decent tools to work with and see what happens. If he still fails, I'll be the first to wave him on his way.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
I find the protection racket run here by some for the $3,000,000 man interesting when he has so clearly failed in the judgement of the lists capabilities and the task he accepted with great confidence.

Surely people can see the current financial agreement with Mick is now in need of renegotiation and restructure...?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Rexy wrote:
I find the protection racket run here by some for the $3,000,000 man interesting when he has so clearly failed in the judgement of the lists capabilities and the task he accepted with great confidence.

Surely people can see the current financial agreement with Mick is now in need of renegotiation and restructure...?


Unfortunately Rexy, when we signed MM we also took on his baggage.

We now have three dud coaches, a fitness guru and Micks personal kick to kick partner to pay for.

It will cost another 3 mill to get rid of them all.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
there are always crap players in premiership teams even

happens in every flag


happened before the salary cap
happened after
they let go of a 200,000 year everritt .. brought in laidler...at 70k

why?
because they had the other bases covered

we dont have bases covered.

laidler isnt as good as docherty or everritt for what we need.
hes slow
you saw us last night....why would we need another slow? and how do we cover for him also?
in among the drafting profile of our clubs recruting how would we cover that guy?
doesnt mean we need laidler
he would add and compound our problems

its all about seeing the big picture.. i know its difficult but try

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:05 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2079
Rexy wrote:
I find the protection racket run here by some for the $3,000,000 man interesting when he has so clearly failed in the judgement of the lists capabilities and the task he accepted with great confidence.

Surely people can see the current financial agreement with Mick is now in need of renegotiation and restructure...?


this club is a mess and I am yet to understand why an independent review hasn't been undertaken, would be the logical way of commencing the process of transforming this club

it beggars belief that we are continually banging our head against a brick wall and expecting different results

to sack Malthouse now would continue our ineptness, wait until late next year and make an assessment then


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
ive been saying we need a review for 5 years
and im not giving them any money till they do

Cret.. u have 26 hours to hand in your homework.

the two drafting records over 6 years please...

dont hand it in late.. or ignore it...

you have been shown your show cause letter

or you become a InCredblus

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group