Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..krooz isn't undersized, 200/201 isn't undersized.. ..giants were very keen, krooz for pick one, and assorted sweeteners was a possibility, that is why it went to the board and why krooz was asked the hard question.... ..both knocked it back.. ..ppl will talk krooz down, and yet he has been our only match winning ruck in a least a decade..
I don't talk Kreuzer down, I love the bloke. But he's not worth anywhere near pick 1 and to suggest the Giants would have entertained it is pure nonsense.
..i'm not suggesting, but rather commenting on what was going on.. ..you really think it went to the board, and the hard word pushed on krooz, if giants thought it nonsense..?.. ..keep in mind it's not just me saying this, other have as well, ppl with inside word.. ..also, keep in mind that at that time no-one knew how injured his foot was.. ..other rucks get hype, cos krooz went pick one he gets flak, but krooz had half a year of highest champ data ranking as an all round ruck, and his goal assist was elite.. ..and his injuries have all been due to him pushing back hard to help our defenders, an indictment on our team that our ruck works harder and runs back faster than everyone else, but that work ethic is massive for rucks..
..some ppl's evaluation of krooz gets clouded by us playing him hurt, and other games out of position.. ..but when fit as first ruck he is very, very good..
..after krooz said no, giants chased mummy.. ..who is older, more injury prone, shorter and not as good as krooz.. ..mummy is on a juice contract over there..