AIRCAV wrote:
18 mtgs ago I'd have said the same about Fitzy. But his handling of the drugs scandal has changed my mind.
I'd only agree with the 'saviour', if they could guarantee me a fully independent review of every position in the club and a guarantee to act on the recommendations.
The current board have achieved nothing. We have no 'brand', we set no standard, we have no direction, we deliver no innovation.
What could have Fitzy done differently with the cheats from Tullamarine? (and that saga hasnt finished yet)
An independent review is definitely needed - something the club has NEVER done before. (the cats did it around 2006 and never looked back since - still competitive and will again go close this year)
It must be a truly independent review.
I remember attending the first AGM that Collo headed when his board took over from Elliott, just over a decade ago.
He promised an independent audit of the club's financial position and records....
Who conducted this audit? Ernst and Young. The very same auditors and financial advise company that he club has used for many years.
I raised my hand to put a question to Collo. "You have conducted an independent audit of the clubs financial position, but have used the same auditors we have always used - how is this audit independent?"
I recall Collo not hearing the question, so I had to repeat it from the second row mind you. Collo's reponse was superb - in true political tradition said nothing, avoided the crux of the question and moved along...
Several questions later, a senior member from the Unofficial Selection committee, raised the question again......We even discussed it further after the meeting was concluded
Dont hold your breath for a truly independent review of all aspects of the club being done...not with the current administration...
they may do a review which is nice and soft and provides the right answers and scapegoats they wish to see take the fall for the mess...
(in any case, can you imagine Mick Malthouse submitting to a review? He doesn't even answer questions he doesn't like from the media - recently a journalist wasn't even allowed to eat a sandwich during a press conference. He treated him like a primary school child. And the journalist didnt even respond. I am not which is more pathetic the Mick tantrum or the pathetic weak response by the journalist. A review wouldn't work on Mick, he would probably go on leave during the review)
The best we may get is a Ziggy type investigation, where nobody is blamed except for some vague reference to governance problems, poor documentation and experimentation with exotic substances... nothing pinned down, nobody named.... its all in the ether, that mysterious gas that pervades everyone and cannot be resisted or countered... its the ether's fault, but almost everyone then resigns.