Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:42 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Dodo27 wrote:
There is a bigger Issue with our team that not many on TC has brought up, which is the Fact that this Season and also some parts of last Season, We have become a 12 goal a game Team. We are badly struggling to kick more than 12 goals a game, even when we Win, we are not kicking any score beyond that!!

The Issue is not the Forward line. With players like Waite, Henderson & Gartlett, we should be kicking a lot more goals....

The Real issue is the fact we are getting Smashed in the center bounces and in the middle by a Ratio of 80-20%. That is massive and it explains why we can't compete. Almost 80% of our Goals have to be constructed from the backline and often from a behind kick in. Having players like Cripps and Judd back will change that ratio. We need to change our structure in the middle. No more Murphy or soft players in there. We need to Win the footy and start kicking Fast Goals.


Another thing which complicates our deficiency to kick goals is MM's style of play in which he likes to play Wide and with short kicks until a Forward ends up marking it in the Pocket and with an Impossible task of kicking a Goal. We are not skilled enough to kick goals from tight angles. Going Wide will not help us. We need to go back to playing basic Footy. Kick it Long and play on at all costs. Do not mark, stop and chip chip. This killed us all of this year!!!


If we kick 12 we'll win by 6 or 7 goals

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:31 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:21 pm
Posts: 126
jimmae wrote:
Ugh... he went in for the ball guys, and got no help in that respect. Was dead on his feet for chunks of the game.

:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:56 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
AGRO wrote:
Blue Tongue wrote:
Judds Junk wrote:
Drewgirl wrote:
Yes finally acknowledged how poor Touhy has been this year !!!!!!! He was one of my favs last year, what the hell happened to him. Looks slow, falls over all the time, poor one on one.

I agree with your outs Bluey44, and also agree Wood should be elevated. Much as anyone will say about him, including myself when we got him, does float around the ground and takes marks. More than any of our other ruckmen do.


yes!! Touhy had been awful this season, honestly he needs at least 3 - 5 weeks back in the reserves, he's a complete waste of space out there right now.

and i agree with most on here, drop Warnock and Rowe, let Wood and Casboult take the rucks... and then when Kreuzer comes back leave him in the ruck where he belongs, at least he competes around the ground.

Even though a lot of Gibbs' possessions where ineffective I did get the sense a few times he was at least trying to crash into the packs, which he did none of against Richmond... I definitely don't think he's our main culprit right now.

for me...

OUT: Warnock, Touhy, Robinson, Ellard, Rowe
IN: Graham, Casboult, Wood, Cripps, Scotland


One who has been very poor is Garlett, I thought Rowe was ok and Robbo is 3rd in disposals so would keep him.



Out: Garlett, Touhy, White
In: dont care



Ins "you don't care" as you obviously "don't care" where Robbo's disposals go to either.

:wink:


Plus 3rd in disposals in this side at the moment isn't saying much. :roll:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 7:05 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Robinson has to go.
Rowe I'm not fussed as all we bring in is Casboult. Neither are any good.
Curnow is a plodder. Tag or nothing.
Garlett hasn't played a good game in 12 months.
Carrazzo needed the run but IMO shouldn't of played.
Tuohy is really struggling.
White was awful.
Waite is the classic downhill skier. When things are good he is good when we struggle he is useless. I'd drop him, not part of the solution.


Over the next few weeks we need to play Cripps, Graham, Temay, Holman, Lucas, Docherty & Giles. Not a lot is there, not even one back up young tall coming through. :cry: Not all at once but we need to start getting games into them and see where they are at, it's now about experience, development and the next 5 years.

PS I'd make Scotland sub. :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 7:17 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
My line up:

Settle the defence:

B: Buckley Jamison Everitt
HB: Docherty Henderson Gibbs

Foll: Warnock Bell Graham
C: Thomas Cripps Simpson

HF: Menzel Rowe Walker
F: Yarran Casboult Murphy

Int: Tuohy Carrazzo Lucas (Scotland)

Emerg: Holman Giles Temay


Have both Rowe & Casboult up forward making a contest. Big targets to go long to and quickly. Surrounded by Mids plus Menzel, Walker & Yarran.

Gibbs back in defence. Yarran back up forward. Turns the ball over too much and is weak defensively to be on or around the ball.

Menzel more on the ball with Cripps & Graham. They will win a lot of footy.

Docherty is probably underdone but it is Melbourne and if struggling later in game Scotland is the right swap. We need his ball use with Gibbs off HB. Henderson back in defence where he plays his best footy.

Scotland is my sub. IMO mature players are better as subs and it doesn't benefit kids.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Dodo27 wrote:
billc3 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
There is a bigger Issue with our team that not many on TC has brought up, which is the Fact that this Season and also some parts of last Season, We have become a 12 goal a game Team. We are badly struggling to kick more than 12 goals a game, even when we Win, we are not kicking any score beyond that!!

The Issue is not the Forward line. With players like Waite, Henderson & Gartlett, we should be kicking a lot more goals....

The Real issue is the fact we are getting Smashed in the center bounces and in the middle by a Ratio of 80-20%. That is massive and it explains why we can't compete. Almost 80% of our Goals have to be constructed from the backline and often from a behind kick in. Having players like Cripps and Judd back will change that ratio. We need to change our structure in the middle. No more Murphy or soft players in there. We need to Win the footy and start kicking Fast Goals.


Another thing which complicates our deficiency to kick goals is MM's style of play in which he likes to play Wide and with short kicks until a Forward ends up marking it in the Pocket and with an Impossible task of kicking a Goal. We are not skilled enough to kick goals from tight angles. Going Wide will not help us. We need to go back to playing basic Footy. Kick it Long and play on at all costs. Do not mark, stop and chip chip. This killed us all of this year!!!


FFS DO NOT KICK IT LONG IF they have one or even two loose men behind the ball....do not kick to a contest if it is two on one...that's not a contest. Chip chip chip when this is occurring ...I have no problem with that ...sorry Dodo.

We were smashed last week kicking it to seriously outnumbered contests...then your stuffed as they have it in space...there are times you must chip it around...you MUST ALWAYS ATTEMPT to keep possession. You should NEVER kick to a contest when an uncontested possession is an option....and a a few other things which need to be drilled into the players. As soon as you see possession footy played against you...MAN UP

Coming out of the middle and kicking long to a one on one in the forward 50 I have no problem with....

If possession footy and man on man only gets scores of 80 points or less ...then so be it.


Bill, our team is not capable of possession footy. We do not have the skills to play that style...How many times did we Turn it over by just chipping it short? We can't even kick it 20m out in front....We have the worst Kicking team in the comp.

Opposition teams in the last 3 rounds all have played spare Men behind the ball and they killed us but the question is, where the heck was their opponents? and what were our Spare men doing? they were no where to be found. Its Dump Football. We need to Man up every spare defender and kick it long 50-50 and Create a contest!!

The other option which we have not been doing is play on at all costs and keep the game running. Possession football is suited for teams like hawthorn and Freo... not us



we havent been drafting players that can mark or kick under pressure to play the possession game
we cant even run hard to create options

were unskilled and lazy

shits me to tears

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
before i see silky velvety creamy footy .. i wanna see some hard work...
if they cant do the basics... the other stuff is too hard for sure.
how about these blokes get down to the basics.. and work for their money... do the small things and build
once they show they can ran harder to present.. i wouldnt mind seeing some variety with criss cross footy

but you cannot play that ad bring the ball inboard if they dont feel like running or putting their body on the line.

impossible.

dont even think about it....

when u kick the ball inside ... not only does the kicker have to have skills and nerves of steel..but the receiver needs to present and work hard...then he needs to mark it under pressure...then deliver the same.. or if he has it spoilt he needs to fight like a demon... or the goals are open behind him

were just not up to that kind of style ..
were slow
we dont work hard
we dont have skills
cant mark
hate body contact

the only way we can play the game is protect it along the boundary .. go from one stoppage to the next.. with our 205 cm ruck and our plethora of slow inside mids who cant run hard

this is the result of our list management
recruiting
and lets not forget development over many years

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:04 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:36 am
Posts: 185
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

_________________
Audere est Facere


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:09 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:04 pm
Posts: 633
Location: Oak Park
Synbad wrote:
were slow
we dont work hard
we dont have skills
cant mark
hate body contact


And that right there is a recipe for disaster!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Franc de Borges wrote:
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

its not about fast .. its about endurance....
which is why Essendon* did what they did

100 meter runners dont enter the 1500 meter races

though if u see 1500 meter runners in the flesh theyre super fast.. just not lightning ... but the sprinter cant do it over 1500 meters

this is where were confused again

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:21 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24634
Location: Kaloyasena
Essendon* are like Secretariart, except for the fact that Secretariat had the very rare genetic "X" factor of endurance and speed.

Essendon* on the other hand have this "X" factor because they are doped up to the eyeballs.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:36 am
Posts: 185
Synbad wrote:
Franc de Borges wrote:
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

its not about fast .. its about endurance....
which is why Essendon** did what they did

100 meter runners dont enter the 1500 meter races

though if u see 1500 meter runners in the flesh theyre super fast.. just not lightning ... but the sprinter cant do it over 1500 meters

this is where were confused again


Endurance is one aspect of it, particularly when defending, but being a quick team has more to do with ball movement than foot speed.

We currently look slower than we actually are due to this boundary hugging game style. No one is prepared to take risks for fear of consequences, which translates to no run which means no options and hey presto = turn over city.

We have a lot of obvious deficiencies but we're playing into the oppostions hands. We're not good, but we're not this bad either.

_________________
Audere est Facere


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Franc de Borges wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Franc de Borges wrote:
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

its not about fast .. its about endurance....
which is why Essendon*** did what they did

100 meter runners dont enter the 1500 meter races

though if u see 1500 meter runners in the flesh theyre super fast.. just not lightning ... but the sprinter cant do it over 1500 meters

this is where were confused again


Endurance is one aspect of it, particularly when defending, but being a quick team has more to do with ball movement than foot speed.

We currently look slower than we actually are due to this boundary hugging game style. No one is prepared to take risks for fear of consequences, which translates to no run which means no options and hey presto = turn over city.

We have a lot of obvious deficiencies but we're playing into the oppostions hands. We're not good, but we're not this bad either.



i agree..but when u have 17 odd players having a total of TWENTY ONE operations... its going to take a toll.
why?
because there is nothing in the ressies to call upon except for slow inside mids
failed early picks
and hbfer types (if we havent already delisted most of those)

u see.. were forced to play who were playing
buckley for pace comes in
lucas has had many opportunities
casboult cant run
carrots comes in because we need leadership

were devoid of what other clubs take for granted....

how did we get here?
we had no plan... for year after year

yes we can drop bell and bring in graham
we can drop ellard and bring in holman
we can drop rowe and bring in casboult

the result is the same isnt it?
none are amazing creative ball users.. none have a huge tank.. none are fast
temay has endurance but thats about all... vanilla as they come..
nothing new can be added to the playing squad

youre just fiddling around the edges

hard to undertand??... do i draw pictures???

again. i am short with people.. but try to be logical

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:36 am
Posts: 185
Synbad wrote:
Franc de Borges wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Franc de Borges wrote:
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

its not about fast .. its about endurance....
which is why Essendon**** did what they did

100 meter runners dont enter the 1500 meter races

though if u see 1500 meter runners in the flesh theyre super fast.. just not lightning ... but the sprinter cant do it over 1500 meters

this is where were confused again


Endurance is one aspect of it, particularly when defending, but being a quick team has more to do with ball movement than foot speed.

We currently look slower than we actually are due to this boundary hugging game style. No one is prepared to take risks for fear of consequences, which translates to no run which means no options and hey presto = turn over city.

We have a lot of obvious deficiencies but we're playing into the oppostions hands. We're not good, but we're not this bad either.



i agree..but when u have 17 odd players having a total of TWENTY ONE operations... its going to take a toll.
why?
because there is nothing in the ressies to call upon except for slow inside mids
failed early picks
and hbfer types (if we havent already delisted most of those)

u see.. were forced to play who were playing
buckley for pace comes in
lucas has had many opportunities
casboult cant run
carrots comes in because we need leadership

were devoid of what other clubs take for granted....

how did we get here?
we had no plan... for year after year

yes we can drop bell and bring in graham
we can drop ellard and bring in holman
we can drop rowe and bring in casboult

the result is the same isnt it?
none are amazing creative ball users.. none have a huge tank.. none are fast
temay has endurance but thats about all... vanilla as they come..
nothing new can be added to the playing squad

youre just fiddling around the edges

hard to undertand??... do i draw pictures???

again. i am short with people.. but try to be logical


How am I not being logical? I understand the list is screwed, but this thread is about the match we have this week, and like it or not I'm discussing our current team, which unfortunately is the only one we have.

You won't get many that disagree our recruiting has been appalling, but is this the thread to do it in?

:banghead:

_________________
Audere est Facere


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:04 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..our foot skills are poor, but there's a very easy way to help it.. ..it's called work rate.. ..if team mates run and spread and create space, it is easy to 'hit them up' with a pass.. ..and your foot skills look good.. ..if there is no separation, if there is no space, if there is always out numbered contests, laser kicking won't help.. ..hawks kicking is good, but not elite,, their work rate is what is elite.. ..it's a lot easier to short pass the ball to a leading team mate in space running at ball carrier..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:18 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:36 am
Posts: 185
On a brighter note, Menzel's pass to Simpson inside 50 was the pass of the year to date.

_________________
Audere est Facere


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:04 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Clayman wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Unfortunately, others require more evidence of shitness before they're convinced


I just don't have a wood over Wood.


But Robbie Warmcock gives you exactly that

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:05 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..our foot skills are poor, but there's a very easy way to help it.. ..it's called work rate.. ..if team mates run and spread and create space, it is easy to 'hit them up' with a pass.. ..and your foot skills look good.. ..if there is no separation, if there is no space, if there is always out numbered contests, laser kicking won't help.. ..hawks kicking is good, but not elite,, their work rate is what is elite.. ..it's a lot easier to short pass the ball to a leading team mate in space running at ball carrier..



well said, we need this to extend to our game plan and structural set up.

We cannot have us leading to the pockets or boundary or having our lead up players out numbered and positioned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:14 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
I have to admit that I am yet to see Temay play,
but recent reports have been good.


Is there any merit in calling up Temay & give Garlett a spell in the 2's to regain form?
Seems like there is zero pressure on Garlett to keep his spot lately.
Needs a gee-up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Synbad wrote:
Franc de Borges wrote:
Remember when we were the quickest team in the league? It was about two years ago. Since then we've only lost Betts.

Playing conservatively doesn't suit the players at our disposal, and if we're going to f*ck it up I'd prefer to do so having a crack through the corridor as opposed to hugging the boundary and kicking it out on the full.

While Ratts was certainly not the answer, the irony is that we'd be pretty well suited to the current trend if he was still at the helm.

its not about fast .. its about endurance....
which is why Essendon** did what they did

100 meter runners dont enter the 1500 meter races

though if u see 1500 meter runners in the flesh theyre super fast.. just not lightning ... but the sprinter cant do it over 1500 meters

this is where were confused again


CFC........Confused Football Club?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group