SurreyBlue wrote:
I like the way posters debate with nothing but personal jibes.....no problems keep up the good work.
back up your comments surrey
were not a heavyweight because we dont have a 33000 stadium to play in thats falling over?
if you keep throwing up ridiculous comments with nothing to back it up.. how does anybody take you seriously?
maybe we deserve to play at a 33000 capacity stadium.... were heading that way.
not because of where we play .. but because of what were doing.
you make too many throwaway comments.. you make them most people throw them the @#$%&! away....
thats a surreism,
explain how we find the 30 to 50 million to rebuild the ground into a 33,000 capacity stadium that will be included in the home and away fixtures and we can still make money
beating a dead stadium is ridiculous!!!..its not going to happen.. it was never going to happen.. will never happen... and we are not stuffed because of that one thing.
we spent too much money and time on that as it is... it cost us already!.. were broke. !!!.. and were backward as a club and that is one of the major reasons.. the mentality of exactly that is the rusty mentality and one of the ridiculous excuses as to why were not progressing
Lets see what excuses we give as to why were crap
the AFL hate us...
We didnt get Goddard
We cant play on the Dome...
We dont have a 33,000 fortress stadium ..
anything else?
could it be that were not a powerhouse club because of how we are directing ourselves forwards not backwards?
i await your logical reply with high expectation surrey
just to recap what i srongly believe... we need to grow our club not shrink it further surrey
shrinking it is bad........ growing it is good....
grow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrink
lets think about growing the club beyond the 33,000 capacity ... do you think thats a ripper idea or a shithouse one??