Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 4:19 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1846
Location: Brisbane, QLD
ThePsychologist wrote:
Scotty12000 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Games are won and lost in the coaches box and training track
Ratten wasn't a pimple on a coaches bum - but we have gone backwards at a rate of knots since he left
Don't often agree with Eddie but he was right about Mick
Low disposal long kicking game is going to get cut up every time
Can't keep giving up the corridor and giving up possession - you need the ball in your hands to win games of footy and you need to close things down when a team gets a couple in a row to stop their momentum
We did it in the third couldnt do it in the second and last quarters


Thought we tried to use the corridor a fair bit last night.

Ratten's game style suited our players. Faced paced running football. Our players loved it because it was unaccountable. It just wouldn't take us to the top.

MM is trying to bring in a successful team defence first model ala Freo, Hawthorn, Sydney etc.

The issue is our players don't work hard enough for long enough. I have no issue with the coach or game style.

It's time the players took responsibility for these inept performances.



So what your saying is that you have taken a girl to the dance who can only do the waltz but you now want here to start doing the samba and the tango but she keeps tripping over her feet


:clap: :clap: :clap:

Great analogy.

The list needs to develop. Evolve or die. Those that can will succeed, those that can't will go. Not enough dance styles in the bag, not enough shuffles on the floor yet. By the end of this year we'll have another bunch to cut and an even clearer idea who we need to fill out the Can-Can.


Really, how has that worked out for us so far?

Considering we've had only one real match after the first big cleanout, it's a bit early to tell. I'm expecting one more clean out at season's end and another decent draft/trade period to get the mix right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15017
Walker received a one week suspension. Dont know what was up with him last night, really out of character.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1846
Location: Brisbane, QLD
kezza wrote:
Walker received a one week suspension. Dont know what was up with him last night, really out of character.

I disagree, this has been building for a while now. Has been a real hothead since last season. The new Waite.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2662
Need more peptides!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
The Rhino wrote:
When the game was there to be won, Murphy was on the pine. Between that and his 2 give offs in front of goal, shocking captain's game.

Just carrying on from the NAB Challenge perhaps?

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:56 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Lazy inconsistent...work ethic is nowhere near good enough...continual turnover of the list until discipline can be instilled into a fresh squad of players who truly want and believe they can succeed...




Bluey44 wrote:
Michael Gleeson from the Age actually sums it up pretty accurately:


Quote:
For periods it was easy to believe the change had come. For periods Carlton played like a side that belonged. There was desperation, there was freedom and there was movement. There were key players in key positions who looked settled. Their recruits both kicked goals and the lead grew.

But then it was as easy to believe little had changed. Matthew Watson looked for places to hide, Andrew Walker looked for mindless things to do and ways to be reported (he succeeded), Matthew Kruezer went in the ruck and the game’s momentum changed. It could not be certain if Lachie Henderson was better played forward or back, Jarrad Waite played a blistering five minute cameo and disappeared and, save for one thrilling goal, Chris Yarran was unsighted.



http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/lack-of-match-fitness-reason-for-loss-says-malthouse-20140317-hvjg2.html


And for all the Warnock-knockers, this is exactly what I was thinking the whole game:

Quote:
Carlton played a game of stark contrast. Perhaps it was coincidence but when Robbie Warnock was in the ruck Carlton looked good. When he was off they did not. A year that might define Matthew Kreuzer’s career did not begin well for him as a ruckman.

When Warnock was on so was Carlton. They won clearances and so earnt the use of the ball and the ownership of it in their forward line. They assailed Port. Almost as simultaneous as his rest on the bench was the return of Port Adelaide to the contest.



Anyone who thinks that Kreuzer should be our number one ruck at the moment ahead of Warnock is kidding themselves.
Robbie has deficiencies around the ground that he needs to work on, but he is a good tap ruckman.

Sometimes I think that people on this site invent negative facts about players just so they can say "I told you so, he's no good, end of story".
That's probably true of a lot of supporters in general.

To be fair to Matty as well, he seemed to be consistently be given ruck duties when a lot of the best mids were being rotated off for a spell.

I agree. I also said a number of times throughout the game that whenever Warnock was in the ruck we looked Ok, and when he went out we dropped off.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:58 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
moshe25 wrote:
I agree. I also said a number of times throughout the game that whenever Warnock was in the ruck we looked Ok, and when he went out we dropped off.


Agree. Every time Port got a run on Kruezer was in the ruck.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
ThePsychologist wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Games are won and lost in the coaches box and training track
Low disposal long kicking game is going to get cut up every time
Can't keep giving up the corridor and giving up possession - you need the ball in your hands to win games of footy and you need to close things down when a team gets a couple in a row to stop their momentum
We did it in the third couldnt do it in the second and last quarters


Thought we tried to use the corridor a fair bit last night.

Ratten's game style suited our players. Faced paced running football. Our players loved it because it was unaccountable. It just wouldn't take us to the top.

MM is trying to bring in a successful team defence first model ala Freo, Hawthorn, Sydney etc.

The issue is our players don't work hard enough for long enough. I have no issue with the coach or game style.

It's time the players took responsibility for these inept performances.


Agree on the attempted corridor use. Our disposal is woeful at times and the turnovers are the killing point in the game that could put us further ahead vs another shot on goal to the oppostion. Repeat offenders for what should be professional standards. Our drafting has not assisted us in this area over the years.

The 1st quarter was the standard we should be aiming for consistently, not a fleeting pick & choose moment by the players. All buy in, fight as one, protect one another and team first oriented mantra. Results will follow if we can bring consistancy to our attack on the game but that has alluded us for so long with these players. Bring in Boof Lehmann or some mental hypnosis.

It is only the 1st round and we showed some real positives while also bringing to the park some usual tripe that we can dish up. Fitness was a real concern and working out how we'll compose our disfunctional forward line into a consistent performer.

A week & a half to remedy, with particular emphasis on how to replicate the start of the 1st quarter as our level of team football that is expected to be delivered week in, week out. No passengers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:09 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Scotty12000 wrote:
Really, how has that worked out for us so far?

Considering we've had only one real match after the first big cleanout, it's a bit early to tell. I'm expecting one more clean out at season's end and another decent draft/trade period to get the mix right.[/quote]

That I agree with. I have been calling for a clean out for several years. Unfortunately our record of what we replace them with isn't that good either.

Stuck between a rock and a hard place. :mad:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
I agree. I also said a number of times throughout the game that whenever Warnock was in the ruck we looked Ok, and when he went out we dropped off.


Agree. Every time Port got a run on Kruezer was in the ruck.


..its what happens when you play an under done ruck, interesting to note that the mc pick krooz to play even when he isn't ready or keep him playing the injury.. ..I don't believe knockers is the clear number one, very little confidence in him to carry the sole ruck duty, coz krooz gets rushed back into the side to help him out.. ..he will be better for the run though, but knockers must do something when not in the ruck, he's a liability when not in the ruck, and can have too many low possession games when playing so much time 'on ball'.. ..if krooz was fit we'd not have seen the drop off, but just another game where the mc have rushed him back into the side..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:11 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Yet to watch the game but there seems to be a few recurring theme. Same as last year and previous years:
1. Lack of leadership when the going gets tough. Simmo seems to be playing a lone hand - still. Captains should lead by example. Not sure that fits with the incumbant. Injured? We have a leadership group that ought to be handling this. They don't or can't.
2. Mental softness, doing the hard things
3. Lack of speed to cover the spread
4. Poor defensive running.
5. Poor footskills

Hard to pick these up on the replay. Maybe our expectations of this current group are too high.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
I agree. I also said a number of times throughout the game that whenever Warnock was in the ruck we looked Ok, and when he went out we dropped off.


Agree. Every time Port got a run on Kruezer was in the ruck.


..its what happens when you play an under done ruck, interesting to note that the mc pick krooz to play even when he isn't ready or keep him playing the injury.. ..I don't believe knockers is the clear number one, very little confidence in him to carry the sole ruck duty, coz krooz gets rushed back into the side to help him out.. ..he will be better for the run though, but knockers must do something when not in the ruck, he's a liability when not in the ruck, and can have too many low possession games when playing so much time 'on ball'.. ..if krooz was fit we'd not have seen the drop off, but just another game where the mc have rushed him back into the side..


The issue is we don't have a No.1. I wouldn't rank any of them ahead of most other clubs No.1 ruck. Wasted a lot of picks and money on average players.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21572
Location: North of the border
Dominator_7 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
No 1 example in the world of how a coach can change things in Manchester United
The most successful club all round in the world - Fergie goes and there goes United
But if you were following united you would blame the administrators of the club


That would be a good example if Ratten had actually achieved something during his time here.
Unlike Moyes, Mick didn't exactly take over a quality side full of top class talent.
And in any case Mick matched the best that Ratts could do last year.



The analogy was to suggest the coach can make a big difference to the side
Man U are still the best administered best off financially of any club in their league
But the coach went and along with it so did their performances

Not comparing Ratts to Fergie at all

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..knockers is 27, and hasn't even played 100 games.. ..we chased him and paid overs coz we thought he would be like Sandi, and krooz was gonna be the next sticks, even though he has never been a key forward type.. ..we keep flirting with the idea of krooz being part ruck part fwd, when it is obvious krooz is an all round work horse ruck.. ..his best games have been him as main ruck.. ..play him as man ruck.. ..knockers can't carry the load anyway, he'll be spent by mid season..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Scotty12000 wrote:
22 players with offseason surgeries
Some of our best 22 still on the sidelines
Some of our best 22 out there horribly underdone
Trying to figure out the right mix given the above
Conditioning due to the above. Buttifant's not a miracle worker
Fittest team in the comp burnt us off in the last



You can't use underdone players as an excuse when you have young, fit midfielders running around in the VFL.
Port were too good. They reacted to our momentum like every other club does. They put floating defenders back and we are unable to adjust. Its been happening since Pagans days and we've done insufficient to address it since.
Until we develop players to make good decisions instead of players to do what they're told, it will continue.

Blame the recruiters all you want but the coaches have the responsibility to develop the players. Millions of kids play the game and the guys that are lucky enough to get drafted are the elite. Very few get there by being stupid. They have learnt to play the game at a very high level. Its then up to the clubs to take them the next step.

I'd suggest we expect their natural ability to get them through. It doesn't work that way. Developing players isn't just about teaching them to kick and handball. Its also about creating an environment where players can make quality decisions under pressure. We take that responsibility away from them and teach them to do what they're told. That will be fine if the game doesn't evolve and stays the same way for 30 years. Unfortunately the rest of the coaches won't accommodate our inadequacies.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15017
As a matter of interest, how many players taken in the last 5 National Drafts played last night?
I can think of Menzel, Watson and McInnes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
May I say 8 pages of hysteria based on 1 quarter of footy. We were in front at three quarter time last night.

Yes I was there and saw us get smashed in the last quarter. I will agree with all that is being said about the team if we base it on that one quarter but really we were okay with a few exceptions up till then. :roll:

Get hysterical after 5 or 6 games into the season. Apart from that I agree play the young 'uns. Menzel, Buckley, Holman, Graham, Cripps, Docherty and yes even Lucas. They are the future.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7387
kezza wrote:
As a matter of interest, how many players taken in the last 5 National Drafts played last night?
I can think of Menzel, Watson and McInnes.

National draft selections (non rookie upgrades) that didn't play

2009 - Kane Lucas
2011 - Joshua Bootsma, Sam Rowe, Dylan Buckley
2012 - Nicholas Graham, Tom Temay
3013 - Patrick Cripps, Cameron Giles, Nick Holman

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..knockers is 27, and hasn't even played 100 games.. ..we chased him and paid overs coz we thought he would be like Sandi, and krooz was gonna be the next sticks, even though he has never been a key forward type.. ..we keep flirting with the idea of krooz being part ruck part fwd, when it is obvious krooz is an all round work horse ruck.. ..his best games have been him as main ruck.. ..play him as man ruck.. ..knockers can't carry the load anyway, he'll be spent by mid season..



Kruezer isn't good enough in the ruck or as a forward, but he does play relatively well (by his standards) against Richmond. Do you give him one more week? That is the question.

He is a nice guy obviously but we aren't playing for tiddlywinks. This is a serious matter and the emotional element should be taken out of it. Everyone likes Kreuzer obviously as he gives it his all and is a real trier, but this is too important to let slide.


Another option is to get Warnock & Casboult (Despite his terrible kicking) or some other combination that gives Carlton an option other than having a match with 2 ruckmen - 1 playing poorly, 1 playing ok. In modern football you can't carry a ruckman as the game is all about speed through the midfield now. You are basically just gifting Port an extra runner.


One of the reasons why Port ran over the top of Carlton is that they went in with one ruckman - Lobbe and had Trengove (15 possessions) a 197cm defender who did some hit outs. There was no double ruckmen option. If we are going double ruckman one of them has to be able to kick goals &/or get a lot of possessions- neither can, so we have to go with the better ruckman, which is Warnock.


Can you remember the 2012 grand final? Two ruckmen - Pyke (16 posessions, 29 hit-outs), Mumford (with an injury - 6 possessions- 14 hit-outs, 3 tackles). Compare that to the match on the weekend - Kreuzer (14 possessions, no tackles, 13 hitouts) and Warnock (4 possessions, 31 hit outs and 1 tackle). ie both Swans ruckmen were contributors and Mumford came off in the last quarter. They subbed out their less effective ruckman and had the option of putting on a runner - Parker.

Carlton on the weekend instead kept two ruckmen in the mix in the last quarter (taking Bell off - who could have pinch hit as a defacto ruckman to wrestle around the boundary - (not in the midfield battles as you risk knee injuries) anyway and he was a running option. ie given us even more run. Taking Bell off in the last quarter was bizarre. They needed runners, why take out a runner and leave on a cumbersome ruckman (Kreuzer) who is having no impact? and/or leave on McLean who was a deer in the spotlight?

Bell is going to give Carlton a lot of options if they persist with him. He just needs more game time. He isn't the best player but at least he can play many roles.






Wayne Johnston said in an interview a few weeks back said Warnock is the key - and we have to persist with him. For the time being, I agree with the Dominator.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 6852882535


Last edited by tap in 79 on Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Blue Vain wrote:
You can't use underdone players as an excuse when you have young, fit midfielders running around in the VFL.
Port were too good. They reacted to our momentum like every other club does. They put floating defenders back and we are unable to adjust. Its been happening since Pagans days and we've done insufficient to address it since.


That kept Port in the game, but their midfield won it for them.
The ball barely made it forward of centre in the last when the game was still there to be won.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Cazzesman, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group