Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..knockers is 27, and hasn't even played 100 games.. ..we chased him and paid overs coz we thought he would be like Sandi, and krooz was gonna be the next sticks, even though he has never been a key forward type.. ..we keep flirting with the idea of krooz being part ruck part fwd, when it is obvious krooz is an all round work horse ruck.. ..his best games have been him as main ruck.. ..play him as man ruck.. ..knockers can't carry the load anyway, he'll be spent by mid season..
Kruezer isn't good enough in the ruck or as a forward, but he does play relatively well (by his standards) against Richmond. Do you give him one more week? That is the question.
He is a nice guy obviously but we aren't playing for tiddlywinks. This is a serious matter and the emotional element should be taken out of it. Everyone likes Kreuzer obviously as he gives it his all and is a real trier, but this is too important to let slide.
Another option is to get Warnock & Casboult (Despite his terrible kicking) or some other combination that gives Carlton an option other than having a match with 2 ruckmen - 1 playing poorly, 1 playing ok. In modern football you can't carry a ruckman as the game is all about speed through the midfield now. You are basically just gifting Port an extra runner.
One of the reasons why Port ran over the top of Carlton is that they went in with one ruckman - Lobbe and had Trengove (15 possessions) a 197cm defender who did some hit outs. There was no double ruckmen option. If we are going double ruckman one of them has to be able to kick goals &/or get a lot of possessions- neither can, so we have to go with the better ruckman, which is Warnock.
Can you remember the 2012 grand final? Two ruckmen - Pyke (16 posessions, 29 hit-outs), Mumford (with an injury - 6 possessions- 14 hit-outs, 3 tackles). Compare that to the match on the weekend - Kreuzer (14 possessions, no tackles, 13 hitouts) and Warnock (4 possessions, 31 hit outs and 1 tackle). ie both Swans ruckmen were contributors and Mumford came off in the last quarter. They subbed out their less effective ruckman and had the option of putting on a runner - Parker.
Carlton on the weekend instead kept two ruckmen in the mix in the last quarter (taking Bell off - who could have pinch hit as a defacto ruckman to wrestle around the boundary - (not in the midfield battles as you risk knee injuries) anyway and he was a running option. ie given us even more run. Taking Bell off in the last quarter was bizarre. They needed runners, why take out a runner and leave on a cumbersome ruckman (Kreuzer) who is having no impact? and/or leave on McLean who was a deer in the spotlight?
Bell is going to give Carlton a lot of options if they persist with him. He just needs more game time. He isn't the best player but at least he can play many roles.
Wayne Johnston said in an interview a few weeks back said Warnock is the key - and we have to persist with him. For the time being, I agree with the Dominator.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 6852882535