Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 2:11 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
ThePsychologist wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Duigan was taken at pick #70 after kids had been selected (McCarthy #34, Mitchell #42, McInnes #67). It's not like the Sam Rowe selection where it could be argued we could have got him with a lesser selection. Duigs was our last draft choice before our promoted rookies and played more games than the three kids taken ahead of him combined.


and you wonder why I have a negative opinion or our recruiting. :wink:

Picked directly after Duigan.

Siposs & Seedsman. :?


Should change your username.

TheHindsightRecruiter

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:18 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
dane wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Duigan was taken at pick #70 after kids had been selected (McCarthy #34, Mitchell #42, McInnes #67). It's not like the Sam Rowe selection where it could be argued we could have got him with a lesser selection. Duigs was our last draft choice before our promoted rookies and played more games than the three kids taken ahead of him combined.


and you wonder why I have a negative opinion or our recruiting. :wink:

Picked directly after Duigan.

Siposs & Seedsman. :?


Should change your username.

TheHindsightRecruiter


Yes :roll: not like I don't give my opinion prior

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48682
Location: Canberra
ThePsychologist wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Duigan was taken at pick #70 after kids had been selected (McCarthy #34, Mitchell #42, McInnes #67). It's not like the Sam Rowe selection where it could be argued we could have got him with a lesser selection. Duigs was our last draft choice before our promoted rookies and played more games than the three kids taken ahead of him combined.


and you wonder why I have a negative opinion or our recruiting. :wink:

Picked directly after Duigan.

Siposs & Seedsman. :?


Fine, take up your criticism with the selections before Duigan. I'm not defending them.

Siposs and Seedsman are hardly world beaters.

IMO Duigan was a worthwhile selection and at the end of the 2011 season I think any rational supporter of Carlton would have agreed wholeheartedly.

Please, point me to your post or posts immediately after the 2010 draft that said we should have selected Siposs or Seedsman instead of Duigan.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48682
Location: Canberra
ThePsychologist wrote:
Yes :roll: not like I don't give my opinion prior


Quite...

viewtopic.php?p=1099005#p1099005

ThePsychologist wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Hey Psych you can ponder Freudianisms with D2K when he comes over. I heard him as well. Intelligent and articulate guy. I reckon he will be an instant cult hero.



I think I might have a new favourite!!!! :thumbsup:



viewtopic.php?p=1115653#p1115653

ThePsychologist wrote:
Asp wrote:
In my view Laidler & Duigan both have to start in round one. Our defece has more holes in it than Swiss cheese and we got slaughtered by turnovers coming out of defence last year. In the longer term I see Laidler as more of a midfielder as Carrots & Scotland start to fade out and Murphy takes the GWS money & runs. However, in the short term he will at least release Gibbs from defence, which will benefit both Gibbs & Carlton.



They'll both play. Laidler can play as a flanker or on a taller player depending upon match up. His kicking will also be vital. Duigan is the strong body we need to zone off and assist Bower and/or Jamo when caught one on one. His kicking will improve as he gets used to pace of game.

A new look defence with Laidler, Duigan, Watson, White, Touhy and Yarran (all very good kicks and have ability to run and carry) included will be a key to us moving up the ladder in 2011.



viewtopic.php?p=1138345#p1138345



ThePsychologist wrote:
This is the side I believe that by years end can beat Collingwood:

B: Touhy Jamison Laidler
HB: Yarran Watson Duigan Gibbs

C: Warnock Judd Murphy Waite Curnow Simpson

HF: Russell Henderson Walker
F: Garlett Kruezer

Int: Lucas Robinson Ellard Sub: Scotland/Armfield/Houlihan

Lots of rotations and options. Priority is kicking and we have some real hardness.
Goalkicking options and flexibility.


viewtopic.php?p=1160919#p1160919

ThePsychologist wrote:
@ BB

Our Dream (Premiership Team) Team?

B: Touhy Jamison Duigan
HB: Yarran Bower Gibbs
C: Waite Curnow Simpson
HF: Garlett Henderson Robinson
F: Betts Kruezer Walker
Foll: Hampson Judd Murphy
Int from: Ellard Scotland Russell Houlihan Carrazzo

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :smoking:




In addtition you hadn't mentioned Siposs on TC until today and Seedsman until 2012.

:roll:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:33 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Seriously? WOW

Why do I have to prove anything? For what reason? I never said I know better?

I'm just sick of the constant stuff ups and mistakes. I'm a supporter and entitled to an opinion.

The point is we can't get it right and things don't change. That's the frustrating part if you're paid for such a role you should be accountable

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:38 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48682
Location: Canberra
ThePsychologist wrote:
The point is we can't get it right and things don't change. That's the frustrating part.


As a general concept I'd agree that our recruiting has room for improvement. Or maybe it's our player development, or both?

Have you compared our recruiting in depth against all other clubs? Are we the only club making mistakes and poor choices?

Just don't come here after the fact and pretend you always judged Duigan to be a dud, which is pretty much what you did a few posts above. It's a piss weak approach to be so assertive with the benefit of hindsight. It just makes your opinion look foolish, especially when it contradicts what you've said in the past.

I understand opinions change, I get that, but it's pretty clear you had no problems with Duigan's recruitment at the time and now you're sprouting a whole bunch of crap that makes it sound like you were.

I have no problem with you or anyone else criticising the club, just be balanced and reasoned about it. Is that a fair enough request?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:
Seriously? WOW

Why do I have to prove anything? For what reason? I never said I know better?
I'm just sick of the constant stuff ups and mistakes. I'm a supporter and entitled to an opinion.
The point is we can't get it right and things don't change. That's the frustrating part if you're paid for such a role you should be accountable


Having an opinion is O.K. I guess

Having an informed opinion is much better though. So much better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:41 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Seriously? WOW

Why do I have to prove anything? For what reason? I never said I know better?
I'm just sick of the constant stuff ups and mistakes. I'm a supporter and entitled to an opinion.
The point is we can't get it right and things don't change. That's the frustrating part if you're paid for such a role you should be accountable


Having an opinion is O.K. I guess

Having an informed opinion is much better though. So much better.


How many people have an "informed" opinion and why is it necessary on a forum?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
And camel brings da buuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnn!!! :yikes: :yikes:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:53 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Why is it necessary to attempt to dominate forum discussion when you clearly have no interest in investing in and communicating your own thought process, or genuinely engaging in that of others?

So far this is a page of you saying "we should do better; look at what they did."

The only problem is that we did better than them up until this point. And pointing at a bloke getting 30 games at the Saints with the way they are playing, as well as a bloke who has 22 games for the Pies with the lack of quality they have in the bottom half of their list. That they've accrued that in 3 seasons is no better than a bunch of also-rans at many clubs including Carlton.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17420
Location: Left Cuckistan
The Psych chop-out/defence team arrives in 3, 2, 1 ....

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:04 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:14 pm
Posts: 88
ThePsychologist wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Average footballer that should never have been drafted let alone a contract for 2014


In terms of value for the pick he was taken at, the drafting of Duigan has proven to be a success IMO.


Can't agree. How well have we done in that period? What has he really done?

Mature players should be picked when you are ready to challenge and then done so through the rookie draft.

Would much rather used those picks on kids.

How the hell did a fringe player get a contract for 2014 anyway?


Got to agree with you. I love Doogs, loved his first season in navy blue, especially his goal against Geelong that season, and the fact he re-invented himself last season but he's lasted only 3 years.

Granted a kid we may have taken at his pick could've been a busted flush but after 3 years that kid would've started to push for continued selection if he was any good.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but we need more return from our draft picks than 1 full season, 2 interrupted & looking like 1 full season taking up a spot with no return.

I'm hoping big time that he tried his utmost to get back but that the knee let him down. He always struck me as one of the best guys to have around the club so with any luck he and the club aren't messing eachother around. Best of luck Doogs in whatever path you now take.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17420
Location: Left Cuckistan
We should have drafted Raso or Tiller again.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Duigan was taken at pick #70 after kids had been selected (McCarthy #34, Mitchell #42, McInnes #67). It's not like the Sam Rowe selection where it could be argued we could have got him with a lesser selection. Duigs was our last draft choice before our promoted rookies and played more games than the three kids taken ahead of him combined.


and you wonder why I have a negative opinion or our recruiting. :wink:

Picked directly after Duigan.

Siposs & Seedsman. :?


..actually Camel, i think Doogs to date has played more games [??] than all the players drafted in his year, combined.. ..i also think he'd have continued to add to his tally [if not by too much] if his body would have allowed him to play further..

..Psych, it didn't work out too well longterm due to body issues, which can happen with any draftee, but i think it was something of an inspired selection myself.. ..at pick 70, a seasoned and experienced state leaguer is a good short term stop gap selection.. ..he added maturity to our list, and leadership.. ..42 games, with some match winning performances [elim final!!] out of a pick 70 draftee is a success.. ..in regards to players like siposs and seedsman, who knows.. ..obviously not on our radar, but there's possibly better picked players after them as well [rookie draft usually turns up at least a couple every year].. ..thing is, after pick 50 odd in the national draft, it's very much hit and miss.. ..what Doogs gave us at pick 70 over 3 years on little coin [am assuming] is a good return/investment..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
NavyIrish wrote:

Got to agree with you. I love Doogs, loved his first season in navy blue, especially his goal against Geelong that season, and the fact he re-invented himself last season but he's lasted only 3 years.

Granted a kid we may have taken at his pick could've been a busted flush but after 3 years that kid would've started to push for continued selection if he was any good.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but we need more return from our draft picks than 1 full season, 2 interrupted & looking like 1 full season taking up a spot with no return.

I'm hoping big time that he tried his utmost to get back but that the knee let him down. He always struck me as one of the best guys to have around the club so with any luck he and the club aren't messing eachother around. Best of luck Doogs in whatever path you now take.



..don't know for certain, but i think the return we got out of Doogs is well above the 'average' for a 'circa pick 70 draftee'.. ..how many players?? [not just kids but even older types] have we as a club drafted that have done better than Doogs around his 'pick' [not including F/S selections].. ..feel free to go back to the turn of the century, further if you can be bothered..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
ThePsychologist wrote:
dane wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Duigan was taken at pick #70 after kids had been selected (McCarthy #34, Mitchell #42, McInnes #67). It's not like the Sam Rowe selection where it could be argued we could have got him with a lesser selection. Duigs was our last draft choice before our promoted rookies and played more games than the three kids taken ahead of him combined.


and you wonder why I have a negative opinion or our recruiting. :wink:

Picked directly after Duigan.

Siposs & Seedsman. :?


Should change your username.

TheHindsightRecruiter


Yes :roll: not like I don't give my opinion prior


:lol:

Go on...

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
If a player can't fulfil their contract then that contract should be null & void without payment moving forward, including TPP on our books.

If we hadn't of made the finals then Duig's would have been an unlikley contracted player for 2014, or he would have been back at pre-seaon training 2 weeks earlier so he could have made a decision before the drafts. Blame the Players Association here. He should have been back at training Nov 4th like the good old days.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
BIRDTOWN wrote:
If a player can't fulfil their contract then that contract should be null & void without payment moving forward, including TPP on our books.

If we hadn't of made the finals then Duig's would have been an unlikley contracted player for 2014, or he would have been back at pre-seaon training 2 weeks earlier so he could have made a decision before the drafts. Blame the Players Association here. He should have been back at training Nov 4th like the good old days.


..like to see you try and implement that, when the reason the player can't fulfill their contract is due to injury incurred at/for the club..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..like to see you try and implement that, when the reason the player can't fulfill their contract is due to injury incurred at/for the club..


He can play on, he's choosing not to. See the AFLPA for post career recourse and/or suitable insurance policy they should have in place.
He's likley been playing football since a wee child, we can't take the hits for his pain. All players have injuries throughout their career from juniors to amateurs to the AFL. He gets paid for the training thus far that he's attended and contract is over & the balance is out of the TPP.
I'm sure we'd offer up a job in development or physcology to him but that should be outisde the TPP and into the football dept.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duigan to retire?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
In fairness, Psych has always been pretty good at nominating the players he likes before and after the draft. He deserves credit for that. Lots of others don't have the courage to do so and be judged three years later. We'd all be none the wiser on his backflip on Duigan if he hadn't committed it to writing.

Just goes to show though that opinions change, we all get it wrong from time to time and its all easy in hindsight.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender and 127 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group