Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1971
It's only an idea for discussion, but the only way to force change is by applying force. The aim would not to overthrow the board but to put people onto the board who have specialised skills and have the time to commit. For instance -
*Who is the Public Realtions and Marketing expert on the board?
*Who is the membership and fund raising expert?
*Who is the expert in Facility & Real Estate development?
*Who is the expert in forward planning?

If people with these expertise don't exist, I ask how can they effectively monitor the people they employ to do these roles?

I'm not on the attack, I'm raising matters for thought, because, like everyone here, I care.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
79Vintage wrote:
It's only an idea for discussion, but the only way to force change is by applying force. The aim would not to overthrow the board but to put people onto the board who have specialised skills and have the time to commit. For instance -
*Who is the Public Realtions and Marketing expert on the board?
*Who is the membership and fund raising expert?
*Who is the expert in Facility & Real Estate development?
*Who is the expert in forward planning?

If people with these expertise don't exist, I ask how can they effectively monitor the people they employ to do these roles?

I'm not on the attack, I'm raising matters for thought, because, like everyone here, I care.


Hit.

Nail.

Head.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:40 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
79Vintage wrote
Quote:
Our board tried to do the MCG deal but the AFL wouldn't accept it, while the foundations Elliott left could not have been worse.


Not Jacks fault Collo wants us at his dome. Jacks been gone for 3 years now get over it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Well, I'm going to be on my footy club's "board" (we call it a committee) next year, and I was also nominated as one of only four for the Best Clubman award, which puts me almost on par with Kouta...so all up I'm going to be way more qualified to talk about all these things then anyone else here.

Be warned!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:50 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Can we get Fevolution on the board?

At least we know during the Trade Period he will do his darndest to get everyone and anyone to Carlton.

:lol:

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:13 pm
Posts: 5954
Location: Carlton North
phoenix johnson wrote:
Can we get Fevolution on the board?

At least we know during the Trade Period he will do his darndest to get everyone and anyone to Carlton.

:lol:


Good idea. You can be our media sl... I mean spokesman. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1971
TheGame wrote:
79Vintage wrote
Quote:
Our board tried to do the MCG deal but the AFL wouldn't accept it, while the foundations Elliott left could not have been worse.


Not Jacks fault Collo wants us at his dome. Jacks been gone for 3 years now get over it.


Really, how 'inciteful'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:11 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Your post was pretty good 79 but you had to throw your little Elliott jibe in. Elliots long gone now we move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1971
TheGame wrote:
Your post was pretty good 79 but you had to throw your little Elliott jibe in. Elliots long gone now we move on.


Elliott's gone but the board still has to deal with the state he left the club in.
Give it another year and I'll agree his off field influence can't be used as a reasoning for problems, on field is another matter - there's still 3/4's of a generation of player's careers left on that meter. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:24 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Vintage, You bring up some very good points. But i have noticed that when your club is flying everything is good, but when your down it has serious negitivity(sorry to bring out the obvious). The reason why i dont like Collo as the president is because he brought Carlton to TD, when we could of had the best ground in Aus and maybe the world.
He had a conflict of interest which hurt the club. CArlton should of gone to the MCG or stayed at Optus (We need a definate home ground). Of course the new admin is going to blame the old but this is why we need to move on and stop blaming and start kickin ass like Carlton was made to do. I love the Collective marketing of the new face of Carlton rather than Kouta wit Fev etc

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Fabulous wrote:
Vintage, You bring up some very good points. But i have noticed that when your club is flying everything is good, but when your down it has serious negitivity(sorry to bring out the obvious). The reason why i dont like Collo as the president is because he brought Carlton to TD, when we could of had the best ground in Aus and maybe the world.
He had a conflict of interest which hurt the club. CArlton should of gone to the MCG or stayed at Optus (We need a definate home ground). Of course the new admin is going to blame the old but this is why we need to move on and stop blaming and start kickin ass like Carlton was made to do. I love the Collective marketing of the new face of Carlton rather than Kouta wit Fev etc


It was the AFL as much as Collins who wanted us at TD.

I think Collins is too negative in the media, crying poor all the time. Difficult circumstances though, he needs fans to be aware of the situation we're in.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1700
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
My opinion for what its worth :
Elliot and his Legends stand debt servicing is the main were in the shite now financially, and will be for many years servicing the debt.
If we went to the Dome when the Bombers did and built proper players facilties instead of the stupid away supporters who never came stand things would be very different now.
The current board has lost some momentum, and Collo has been unwell, but really not much more you can do unless we win some games and sell corporates and sponsors some hope. I think the marketing revenues were actually pretty good this year-which is amazing.
Don't confuse "footy show" and oh Fev's a dill marketing with real dollar returns. Corporate packages sold out, GF lunch sold out, new sponsor Dan Murphy's, continued Optus support.
Take our medicine now and plan to charge forward in two years time, I'm pretty happy were headed back up the J curve.

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:33 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
phoenix johnson wrote:
I was more or less thinking along the lines of what sort of salary does a board member recieve.



Nothing. It doesn't involve giving up your job either. Collo is still boss of TD. Others have their own jobs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:48 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:38 am
Posts: 163
Location: MELBOURNE
This Board & Administration lost me last year with the gutless decision process they went through in moving us from OO to TD.

Nearly everything they promised at the time would happen has either not happened or is far below the expectations they raised at the time.

How is the ground re-development going? This was a key part of the propsal that the AFL would support the re-development of OO into an elite traing facility. Doesn't look any different to me.

The move was supposed to secure the clubs short and long term futures. That is debatable.

The move was to (and I quote) "underpin(s) the club's resurgence both on and off the field. Not looking good so far is it.

Significantly higher attendances. Probably has been so tick here.

Increased revnue opportunities and significantly increased FTA coverage. How many Friday night games in 2006 v Collingwood who finished 2nd last?

Provide Social Club facilities at TD and MCG. Not sure on this one but from all reports only average.

The worst commercial decision ever by the club (lead by a President with a massive COI) is underpinned by a 10 year deal. 10 years! Unbelievable and most fell for it.

I agree that we all support a club but Brand building is everything. We have done a poor job on this.

The Board and Administration has been a huge dissappointment for mine. The sooner they are challenged the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:59 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 86
Add to that Kermit the split for next year being 8-3 towards the TD.... Despite assurances that it would be 6-5 for the next nine years (and certain board members worked hard to get that many G games).

AFL takes some blame, but the club must have signed off on it. Commonwealth Games just an excuse. Massive COI, couldn't agree more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
there's a difference between Conflict of Interest and Competing Interests. I don't think Collo has a CoI, so much as Competing Interests, and maybe he hasn't received good advice as to how to make sure they don't appear as a CoI, or don't become one.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:26 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Just on the financial status of the club. Don't forget some very important things:

1) Carlton's assets were massively overvalued on the books when the new board took over
2) The club had significant debt (over $10,000,000)
3) The club had no option but to relocate from Optus because it couldn't afford to maintain the ground on its own, and the AFL certainly weren't going to help (even in terms of fixturing). This meant another significant asset writedown.

Considering the true financial position of the club when the new board took over, judging the financials at 3/10 is ridiculous. I'm not arguing that the club is completely on top of things, but they have been in survival mode, and that won't last forever.

However, I would agree that marketing has been especially poor, the external impression of the club is poor by modern standards.

What the club NEEDS to do this year is:
- Improve communication - The club has consistently said that it is in the 3rd year of a five year plan. Great, so set some benchmarks and publish then so that the board can be held to account.
- Work out what we are going to do at Optus. This might take a while, finances, design, planning permission, etc. But at least tell the members when the timeframe for all of these things are.

At the moment it is possible that the board is doing a very good job and not communicating it. It's also possible that the board is completely crap and that the lack of communication is testiment to a lack of ideas. Experience tells me that the truth is somewhere in between.

The one thing that the CFC needs to sort out, though, is its communication with members. Communicate often and in various ways. Without this, no matter how good the board is there will always be mumurring and disquiet. If memory serves this board promised increased transparency, this is the year to demonstrate it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:32 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
In regard to communication: The Club has improved by providing e-mail updates to member and doing member surveys. I like the idea of e-mail updates to members (especially for cost reasons) - however the content of these e-mails is quite poor - mostly news we can read in the papers or onthe web site the next or same day. So there is improvement in channels not so much in content.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:37 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
hey free ghostly ermials is a good thing! 8) Though i understand about recieving a Mke and dan or a Geek as an email - whamo spamo if you ask me...ask for the buzz... well, flies buzz...

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:43 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
JohnM wrote:
Financials
None of us know, so it's beyond foolish to even comment. Suffice to say, however, that sorting out the financial mess we've been in would be just about the worst job in football. I don't envy them.

Membership
You can't argue with the numbers, especially given our poor onfield performances. Expect a drop this season, but a good performance overall. The supporters should take much of the credit for this, however.

Onfield Performance
The team's performance onfield suggests a club that isn't united in its focus and vision. Yes, we lack talent. But on several occasions it's seemed that we've also lacked the will to fight. Not good, and potentially symptomatic of broader problems.

Marketing
Poor, but the club isn't on its lonesome here. Many clubs do a bad job. The fact that there are no marketing professionals on the board, coupled with the board's unwillingness or inability to pay good people to do the job, is telling. Very much need to improve in this area.

The Vibe
You know, that sense of energy and enthusiasm and drive that we all like to feel coming from the club. It just isn't there, and it's because our Pres. is Mr.Dour himself, our coach has mastered the art of saying nothing at all times, his support staff are invisible, our players look dispirited and everyone compares everyone else to Eddie McGuire. Vibe is poor.

Work Ethic
Let's not forget that these guys are doing this job for free, and at the moment it'd have to be a thoroughly unpleasant job at that. So kudos for the guys who've put their hands up, and well done for jumping in when the club needed you most.

Conclusion
Where's Mike Fitzpatrick when we need him?


To the point as always.

Further to the whole vibe scenario, I feel this is built piece by piece from small parts making a greater sum. Kind of like a team really. At the start of the year things were looking good with the Mickey Mouse Cup win. People were excited, but without some of the other pieces in place the vibe, as well as the team's performance dropped off.

Later this year we'll get a nice nudge with the draft, having #1 and #4 picks will enthuse many around the club. However, to help the vibe along we need to know a clear plan for rebuilding the team, we need to know a solid direction for promoting and rebuilding the club off the field, in other words a vocal board with a united vision, and we need the players to be consistently playing with passion, honour and commitment.

If we can't put all those things in place then I think we'll be on a longer road to success than we'd care to think about.

In my mind there is no doubt that Collo's ticket was the right choice for the time. However, while some aspects of their tenure has been good, I think there are a few other aspects that could improve.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group