Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:02 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Pafloyul wrote:
dane wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
klakker wrote:
We all know that we need changes to the list . Well we are starting to make them .
Some of you need to HTFU . We finished 6th for christs sake . 12 teams finished lower than us .

Our list is not the best ( thanks to Ratten and Hughes ) , but change is happening .

Some of you blokes should f*^% off , and support Richmond , Norf or the Puppies . Then you'd have something to whinge about .




Don't sugar coat it. We finished 9th. Sure we finished 6th when we're bragging to Pies and Bombers fans, but really, we were 9th. Lost to Saints, Dogs. Didn't beat a top 4 team. Again. Miles away.


But in the end we finished 6th.


For practical purposes, we finished 9th, it would be counter-intuitive to look at it any other way.

No, for practical purposes, we finished 6th. Intuition has NOTHING to do with it. It's all empirical and arithmetic. You look at the ladder, and you count the teams that finished above us. Hmmm, let's see, that's one, two, three, four, five...... oops, that's all...... there's Carlton. Woohoo, we finished sixth.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I don't think he's counting how many games we won
Yes was a good result in the end.

We beat our bitches and got smashed by a broken down side who are finals made

What that tells me is what you can do if you're a good side.
We've never been finals made material.

It's been over a decade.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
moshe25 wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
dane wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
klakker wrote:
We all know that we need changes to the list . Well we are starting to make them .
Some of you need to HTFU . We finished 6th for christs sake . 12 teams finished lower than us .

Our list is not the best ( thanks to Ratten and Hughes ) , but change is happening .

Some of you blokes should f*^% off , and support Richmond , Norf or the Puppies . Then you'd have something to whinge about .




Don't sugar coat it. We finished 9th. Sure we finished 6th when we're bragging to Pies and Bombers fans, but really, we were 9th. Lost to Saints, Dogs. Didn't beat a top 4 team. Again. Miles away.


But in the end we finished 6th.




For practical purposes, we finished 9th, it would be counter-intuitive to look at it any other way.

No, for practical purposes, we finished 6th. Intuition has NOTHING to do with it. It's all empirical and arithmetic. You look at the ladder, and you count the teams that finished above us. Hmmm, let's see, that's one, two, three, four, five...... oops, that's all...... there's Carlton. Woohoo, we finished sixth.



We didn't win enough games during the season to make finals on merit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:20 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
moshe25 wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
dane wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
klakker wrote:
We all know that we need changes to the list . Well we are starting to make them .
Some of you need to HTFU . We finished 6th for christs sake . 12 teams finished lower than us .

Our list is not the best ( thanks to Ratten and Hughes ) , but change is happening .

Some of you blokes should f*^% off , and support Richmond , Norf or the Puppies . Then you'd have something to whinge about .




Don't sugar coat it. We finished 9th. Sure we finished 6th when we're bragging to Pies and Bombers fans, but really, we were 9th. Lost to Saints, Dogs. Didn't beat a top 4 team. Again. Miles away.


But in the end we finished 6th.


For practical purposes, we finished 9th, it would be counter-intuitive to look at it any other way.

No, for practical purposes, we finished 6th. Intuition has NOTHING to do with it. It's all empirical and arithmetic. You look at the ladder, and you count the teams that finished above us. Hmmm, let's see, that's one, two, three, four, five...... oops, that's all...... there's Carlton. Woohoo, we finished sixth.


So, when discussing list management, which is what we are doing, we should include the team disqualification wild-card factor in our evaluations - good luck with that. :roll:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
I assume we're getting the draft pick equivalent of finishing ninth then?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:30 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Stamos wrote:
There's a lot of rubbish sprouted in this thread.

Like complaining about Waite's contract. You guys realise that only half of it counts in the cap right? But if we only gave him 2 years, and signed him again for this year (or are you suggesting we should cut him?), then we'd only save $112 500, so he would actually cost us more cap space.

Eddie is not worth anything like 500. As sad as it is to lose him, it's a good thing that we didn't concede to his demands.



Waite's situation reminds me too much of the Whitnall situation. Big and long contracts offered for little output.

At least Lance made All-Australian one year on the back of kicking 8 goals in 2000 against Brisbane (a quality team) and the like.

Waite has been given long and big contracts for what type of output?

He once got a 3rd placing in the best and fairest back in 2007 when Carlton's team was far worse than what it is now.

No doubt he is talented, no doubt he is skilled etc, no doubt he kicked a couple of good goals against Richmond in the final - but does that add up to a 1.3 million dollar contract? I agree with Synbad - a better understanding of how to negotiate contracts is needed otherwise Carlton will be hampered when they want to recruit good players in trades.

I hope Waite has a big year next year- that would be fantastic, but based on his output to date Carlton (as with the Whitnall situation...again another key forward) have been done over pretty comprehensively.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:42 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
So Waite got a $1.3m contract?
That's approx 433k a year, and about 217k included in the salary cap. Don't know what world you're living in, but in AFL in this decade, that's not a big or long contract.

Especially for a player of Waite's position and ability.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:46 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Pafloyul wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
dane wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
..........

Don't sugar coat it. We finished 9th. Sure we finished 6th when we're bragging to Pies and Bombers fans, but really, we were 9th. Lost to Saints, Dogs. Didn't beat a top 4 team. Again. Miles away.


But in the end we finished 6th.


For practical purposes, we finished 9th, it would be counter-intuitive to look at it any other way.

No, for practical purposes, we finished 6th. Intuition has NOTHING to do with it. It's all empirical and arithmetic. You look at the ladder, and you count the teams that finished above us. Hmmm, let's see, that's one, two, three, four, five...... oops, that's all...... there's Carlton. Woohoo, we finished sixth.


So, when discussing list management, which is what we are doing, we should include the team disqualification wild-card factor in our evaluations - good luck with that. :roll:

Well, you can't have it both ways. Either Essendon* didn't cheat, is a better team than us and we finished ninth..... OR they're a bunch of cheating bottom feeding scumsters, and their "finishing sixth" or whatever it was, is completely wrong, corrupt, flawed. If it's the second, then they ABSOLUTELY did NOT finish in the top eight, and we did! In that case, after we beat Richmond, and lost to Sydney, we finished sixth.

I agree with you that it doesn't work to overestimate our list. I do agree that it's completely unbalanced, doesn't contain enough great players, and is full of the results of 5-10-15 years of bad decision making.

HOWEVER..... it also doesn't work to UNDERestimate it. Underestimating a list leads you to make equally flawed decisions. As they say in the classics..... it is what it is - neither better nor worse. Start from there, and make decisions accordingly.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
Lions want pick 28 (hampson pick) for docherty.
Blues want to give them pick 29 our second rounder.
Rapt to get him for pick 28.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
I reckon next time we're looking for new recruiting staff Chris Pelchin would be worth ago. His media persona whilst at Hawthorn gave me the impression of a total a-hole that no one wants to deal with, however ...

I like the way he obviously tries to build a list aimed at peaking for a specific premiership window. He did it at Port and Hawthorn and has started doing it at St Kilda. (the ruckmen for Savage and a first rounder will benefit the Saints in 4-5 years which is their best hope for being good again). I'd like to see Carlton more obviously adopt this approach.

Incidentally, so I reckon we're doing very well with our trades so far this year, but geez I would have retracted that opinion if we had of picked up Chapman, Pods .. etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Stamos wrote:
So Waite got a $1.3m contract?
That's approx 433k a year, and about 217k included in the salary cap. Don't know what world you're living in, but in AFL in this decade, that's not a big or long contract.

Especially for a player of Waite's position and ability.


An extension given for 3 years at the time when he was out with an injured knee...quality list management I say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
You build a list that can be AFL finals ready.
A list that can break into the top four and give it a shake.

We haven't
So our football dept has failed is task.
There are no excuses
It's the only measure.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
blueboy23 wrote:
Raph at pick 28.


EFA.

If he's still there.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:23 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
BigKev wrote:
I reckon next time we're looking for new recruiting staff Chris Pelchin would be worth ago. His media persona whilst at Hawthorn gave me the impression of a total a-hole that no one wants to deal with, however ...

I like the way he obviously tries to build a list aimed at peaking for a specific premiership window. He did it at Port and Hawthorn and has started doing it at St Kilda. (the ruckmen for Savage and a first rounder will benefit the Saints in 4-5 years which is their best hope for being good again). I'd like to see Carlton more obviously adopt this approach.

Incidentally, so I reckon we're doing very well with our trades so far this year, but geez I would have retracted that opinion if we had of picked up Chapman, Pods .. etc.


You do realise the trade period is still going?

Also trades? We have done one trade.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 1649
Blues have agreed with Bootsma to part ways if a suitable trade can be arranged to West Coast. If not, he'll stay - AFL.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15003
fmurphy30 wrote:
Blues have agreed with Bootsma to part ways if a suitable trade can be arranged to West Coast. If not, he'll stay - AFL.com

I would love to know what the story with him is. Really strange that he re-signed only a couple of months ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
dane wrote:
BigKev wrote:
I reckon next time we're looking for new recruiting staff Chris Pelchin would be worth ago. His media persona whilst at Hawthorn gave me the impression of a total a-hole that no one wants to deal with, however ...

I like the way he obviously tries to build a list aimed at peaking for a specific premiership window. He did it at Port and Hawthorn and has started doing it at St Kilda. (the ruckmen for Savage and a first rounder will benefit the Saints in 4-5 years which is their best hope for being good again). I'd like to see Carlton more obviously adopt this approach.

Incidentally, so I reckon we're doing very well with our trades so far this year, but geez I would have retracted that opinion if we had of picked up Chapman, Pods .. etc.


You do realise the trade period is still going?

Also trades? We have done one trade.


You do realise the trade period is still going?
... urr ... that's why I said "so far".

Also trades? We have done one trade

Yep - fair criticism. I was really thinking of the overall list changes rather than specifically trades.

Mick has made it clear that he thinks small forwards who can't rotate through the midfield are old news, so paying overs for Eddie would've been a fail.
Maintaining three #1 ruckmen was wasting a place on our list. #28 for Hampson is a win.
Thomas ... if fit will be a good acquisition. Juries out 'till he plays I reckon.
I'm not one who likes to see us trade away our draft picks, so not much activity is a win in my book.

Stop Press : Bootsma!! WFT?? So much for trying to instill a bit of club passion into the young man. The way it reads is that we don't have anyone specific we want, he's just being shopped around. :mad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18656
Location: threeohfivethree
padre wrote:
Interestingly he only ever kicked 6 goals against adelaide in his entire 9 years.
37 v richmond
39 v Essendon**
32 v collingwood.


Adelaide's the anti-Carlton.

They only trade for players who didn't play one good game against them.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Andain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You look at the payment structure standard and I fail to see how betts should be paid less than others.

If you fail to see why a small forward should be paid less than others in our side then you have questionable eyesight indeed.

Eddie was right to go, we were never going to pay him that kind of money and I'd have been fuming if we did.

Ok over the last five years which has been our most potent.
Game is about winning scores...
I don't care if he's small it tall he's our most productive forward
You sound like you doubt me because Eddie is not tall but Casboult Rowe are ?

You've been watching Carlton play over the last five years and you still don't understand why a decent key forward is more important to the structure of a team than a great small forward?

Seriously?? :confused:

P.S: I'm not saying that Casboult or Rowe are decent key forwards at the minute.


Last edited by Andain on Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
blueboy23 wrote:
Lions want pick 28 (hampson pick) for docherty.
Blues want to give them pick 29 our second rounder.
Rapt to get him for pick 28.



28 or 29, who cares? Small price to pay for a kid who has "Triple Brownlow Medallist" written all over him

:razz:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group