Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Overall there's been a definite shift from "wanting more money/opportunity" to "wanting a premiership". As usual, we're still behind the trend and aiming for what worked 5-6 years ago.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2760
I think we focus too much on our duds and are quick to lionise anything that Syd, Geel, Haw do.
Most teams pick duds and most teams let players through who turn out to be guns.

All top 30 picks have talent and skills. Whether they turn out to be guns depends on a multitude of things which are difficult to know at the time of the draft. Depends on things such as internal drive, club's ability to develop, standards set by coaches and other players at training and on match day etc...

Below, I have listed out some top 30 duds picks from Carl, Haw, Syd & Geelong from 2005-2010.
I then list some players that all clubs missed until at least pick 20.
I think it shows that Carlton has not done as badly as is often made out - IN TERMS OF RAW PICKS. (I think we can do a lot better in terms of development and setting standards... which is where I think the top teams really carve us up):

Carl dud top 30 picks since 2005: Bower, Hampson, Lucas, Watson
Haw dud top 30 picks since 2005: Ellis, Thorp, Muston, Dowler, Brent Renouf, Schoenmakers,
Geel dud top 30 picks since 2005: Varcoe*, Trent West, Menzel*, Smedts, Djerrkura, Mitch Brown, Smedts
Syd dud top 30 picks since 2005: Lewis Johnston, Daniel O'Keefe, Veszpremi, Brett Meredith, Jed Lamb,

* If Varcoe was at Carlton, we would have ruled him a dud long ago, Menzel keeps getting injured (could say similar thing about Bailey but, given he just won a Premiership.....)

Guns picked from pick 20: Fyfe, Ibbotsen, Rory Sloane, Chris Mayne, Ballantyne, Lindsay Thomas, Bernie Vince, Andrew Swallow, Tippett, Josh Kennedy (Haw/Syd - wouldn't have been picked top 30 if not for Father/Son), Todd Goldstein, Zaharakis, Sam Reid, Tayte Pears, Jack Steven, Westhoff, Jackson Trengove (PA), Jack Reddden, Dayne Beams, Hannebury, Steven Motlop, Bastinac, Carlisle, Gunston,

AND, it is possible that Watson still develops into a good footballer, as could Lucas and Hampson.
Mostly, I've ruled the duds based on how we would have treated them if they were picked by Carlton...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:29 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
99prelim wrote:
I totally get the 'it's not an exact science' argument Cazz

Our drafting in the last 5-7 years has been so heavily skewed toward 'misses' rather than 'hits' that the Nathan Fyfe stories really raise concerns about recruiting strategy and quality.

I haven't done the research but would love to know where we would be on the recruiting ladder just based on NRS nominations over the last 5-7 years. I dare say it won't make enjoyable reading


NRS nominee ladder over last five years:
1. GWS: 11
2. Adelaide: 10
2. Melbourne: 10
4. Collingwood: 9
5. Essendon*: 8
6. Richmond: 7
6. Brisbane: 7
8. Bulldogs: 6
8. West Coast: 6
8. Hawthorn: 6
8. Gold Coast: 6
12. Geelong: 5
12. Fremantle: 5
12. Sydney: 5
15. Port Adelaide: 4
15. North Melbourne: 4
17. St Kilda: 3
17. Carlton: 3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Geez, didn't even expect that many...

EDIT: Yarran and Garlett in 2010
AJ in 2009

So yeah, our "in the last 5 years" list is a bit skewed...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Donstuie wrote:
Geez, didn't even expect that many...

Who would they be? Yarran and Garlett maybe?

Aaron Joseph


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Posts: 1508
17th Prem, you are a hard taskmaster. Jed Lamb, dud????

We'd have him in a heartbeat.

_________________
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:14 pm
Posts: 630
Location: Caroline Springs
a lot of players been floated around in upcoming trade. A lot of discussion as to who we should be going for.
I bet we end up with scraps as most of these players have been linked to other clubs already.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
mikeychook wrote:
17th Prem, you are a hard taskmaster. Jed Lamb, dud????

We'd have him in a heartbeat.

Smedts? Gun in the making.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:35 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
17th Premiership wrote:
I think we focus too much on our duds and are quick to lionise anything that Syd, Geel, Haw do.
Most teams pick duds and most teams let players through who turn out to be guns.

All top 30 picks have talent and skills. Whether they turn out to be guns depends on a multitude of things which are difficult to know at the time of the draft. Depends on things such as internal drive, club's ability to develop, standards set by coaches and other players at training and on match day etc...

Below, I have listed out some top 30 duds picks from Carl, Haw, Syd & Geelong from 2005-2010.
I then list some players that all clubs missed until at least pick 20.
I think it shows that Carlton has not done as badly as is often made out - IN TERMS OF RAW PICKS. (I think we can do a lot better in terms of development and setting standards... which is where I think the top teams really carve us up):

Carl dud top 30 picks since 2005: Bower, Hampson, Lucas, Watson
Haw dud top 30 picks since 2005: Ellis, Thorp, Muston, Dowler, Brent Renouf, Schoenmakers,
Geel dud top 30 picks since 2005: Varcoe*, Trent West, Menzel*, Smedts, Djerrkura, Mitch Brown, Smedts
Syd dud top 30 picks since 2005: Lewis Johnston, Daniel O'Keefe, Veszpremi, Brett Meredith, Jed Lamb,

* If Varcoe was at Carlton, we would have ruled him a dud long ago, Menzel keeps getting injured (could say similar thing about Bailey but, given he just won a Premiership.....)

Guns picked from pick 20: Fyfe, Ibbotsen, Rory Sloane, Chris Mayne, Ballantyne, Lindsay Thomas, Bernie Vince, Andrew Swallow, Tippett, Josh Kennedy (Haw/Syd - wouldn't have been picked top 30 if not for Father/Son), Todd Goldstein, Zaharakis, Sam Reid, Tayte Pears, Jack Steven, Westhoff, Jackson Trengove (PA), Jack Reddden, Dayne Beams, Hannebury, Steven Motlop, Bastinac, Carlisle, Gunston,

AND, it is possible that Watson still develops into a good footballer, as could Lucas and Hampson.
Mostly, I've ruled the duds based on how we would have treated them if they were picked by Carlton...



Slightly misleading.
You need to show the whole picture. Draft picks 1-5 pick themselves . They should be excluded from discussion. Excluding those picks and realising that trading takes away many picks, and also that we had a compromised draft, yields a different interpretation.
2005 murphy, kennedy, bower ...... Bower fail.100% fail
2006 gibbs hampson grigg (for me grigg a bust)......hampson grigg. 100% fail
2007 kreuzer no further pick judd to carlton not possible to rate
2008 yarran, no further pick warnock to carlton......hard to assess not a clear 100% win though.
2009 lucas, no further pick Mclean to carlton ....... Lucas fail 100% fail
2010 compromised draft only 1 pick Watson....... Watson fail. 100% fail
2011 compromised draft only 1 pick Bootsma............jury out too early
2012 compromised draft only 1 pick Menzel........... Seems a win. Barring injury. 100% win


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:41 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Premiership 17,

I was a Hughes supporter until 2 years ago & I was wrong. Arguing that we have recruited well falls into declaring that the operation has been a success but the patient has died. It does not matter how you cut it, our list is a shambles and our result this year was propped up by luck and aging stars

BOG v Richmand Final
Judd - 30 years old
Waite - 30
Betts - 26
Simpson- 29
Gibbs - 25
Henderson - 24
Avg age = 27.3

Only 2 of those players were recruited in the draft proper. Menzel was the only drafted recruit that got a game that day who has been drafted since 2009.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Michael Jezz wrote:
It is much easier topping up a list wheN you have an existing 5 or 6 players that can win you a premiership. Carlton did it to win the 95 premiership. Hale, lake and Gibson would not make carlton a top 4 team. The carlton problem has as much to do with not embracing the draft for 3 or four seasons as well as bad selection. We need to commit to 3 or 4 years of drafting and development for the daisy type trades to really reap a benefit above maintaining our middle ladder status


That's right, although we probably should have gone after Gunstan. Hawthorn were always on the cusp and had a solid core of champions already set in place. We have less premiership worthy players and some of the top tear are under-performing. I bet Hawthorn fans were happy enough with their list where it stood and had no culture problems to top it off.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Pafloyul wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
It is much easier topping up a list wheN you have an existing 5 or 6 players that can win you a premiership. Carlton did it to win the 95 premiership. Hale, lake and Gibson would not make carlton a top 4 team. The carlton problem has as much to do with not embracing the draft for 3 or four seasons as well as bad selection. We need to commit to 3 or 4 years of drafting and development for the daisy type trades to really reap a benefit above maintaining our middle ladder status


That's right, although we probably should have gone after Gunstan. Hawthorn were always on the cusp and had a solid core of champions already set in place. We have less premiership worthy players and some of the top tear are under-performing. I bet Hawthorn fans were happy enough with their list where it stood and had no culture problems to top it off.

I thought we did, and were basically told to GAGF.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 615
Warby wrote:
I was amazed to be honest; at the quality of players that Hawthorn have extracted from opposing teams.

Yes; they've possibly/probably improved markedly since arriving at the Hawks; but that team yesterday played as if they'd been together forever.

The recruiters have got it right; and the whole backup team is obviously as one with them and Club Management.

Oh; that we could say the same.... :sad:



An interesting case study would have been if Thornton went to Hawthorn all those years ago. Lucky we saved him!

_________________
Get comfortable being uncomfortable


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Always a little suspicious about clubs who can constantly stay near the top.

Is there ever a story about Geelong and the Hawks and salary cap pressure?

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
cimm1979 wrote:
Always a little suspicious about clubs who can constantly stay near the top.

Is there ever a story about Geelong and the Hawks and salary cap pressure?

Nope, but plenty about how players are willing to take pay-cuts to stay together.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Donstuie wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
It is much easier topping up a list wheN you have an existing 5 or 6 players that can win you a premiership. Carlton did it to win the 95 premiership. Hale, lake and Gibson would not make carlton a top 4 team. The carlton problem has as much to do with not embracing the draft for 3 or four seasons as well as bad selection. We need to commit to 3 or 4 years of drafting and development for the daisy type trades to really reap a benefit above maintaining our middle ladder status


That's right, although we probably should have gone after Gunstan. Hawthorn were always on the cusp and had a solid core of champions already set in place. We have less premiership worthy players and some of the top tear are under-performing. I bet Hawthorn fans were happy enough with their list where it stood and had no culture problems to top it off.

I thought we did, and were basically told to GAGF.


By whom were we told where to go and what did we offer Adelaide?

*Edit*

Don't worry, it was probably Gunstan himself that wasn't keen but I don't know how all that worked.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I don't remember the particulars, but I recall we were out of the race very quickly.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2760
Re Jed Lamb & Billie Smedts, happy to include if you're happy to remove Lucas from our list of duds..., ito be consistent (see 2013 comparison below).
My point is that we are overly critical of our own and overly praising of others.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying we shouldn't be critical and ruthless in our pursuit of excellence (and effort!) but it is not always roses on the other side of the fence either.

Averages for 2013
Lucas: Kicks 9.6, Handballs 8.5, Disposals 18.1, Marks 4.4, Tackles 2.1, Goals 0.5, Dreamteam 69.9
Lamb: Kicks 6.0, Handballs 3.8, Disposals 9.8, Marks 2.2, Tackles 2.1, Goals 0.7, Dreamteam 44.9
Smedts: Kicks 5.8, Handballs 5.0, Disposals 10.8, Marks 3.1, Tackles 3.1, Goals 0.9, Dreamteam 53.9

Lucas played 17 games, Lamb 12 and Smedts 13. Neither of them played finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:08 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Donstuie wrote:
I don't remember the particulars, but I recall we were out of the race very quickly.


Yeah, I thought it might have been a refusal to part with our first rounder but it might have been Gunstan himself that wasn't keen.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Gunstan's dad is high up at the bombers right?

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MPH78, Noonamah Blue and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group