SurreyBlue wrote:
Well said MM. I find it amazing some people still can't see it.
Some on TC even raised these points at the time and were belittled by the usuals.
You dont tank because you deserve to be in the finals.. u tan because your organisation is shit...and youd win 2 games more... but u dont to take 2 players in the top 5
if you won 2 games more .. and took one player.. youre not a winner!!!...
and if you cant choose 2 players who are going to be any good ... why would u be better if you chose just one player???
see surrey.. i dont get your logic
were u saying we were very good but we tanked??
or are you saying... if we had one pick 2 picks later ... it would have been better than having two picks in the first 5 picks one of whom u can choose any kid in the country before anyone else has first dibs.
i often hear u saying this but explain yourself...
Where do u see us tanking and where were we if we didnt tank???
This is the frustrating thing with YOU surrey.. your half baked posts
Do you think by losing a game or 2 extra .... were not talking even being anywhere near finals or even mid table ... we got into a loser mentality???... when we could have finished 14th out of 16 and had say pick 4 or 5.. like the year we chse russell and not franklin and roughead???
or russell and not murphy and kennedy/ judd??
tanking didnt give us a losing culture.. shitness did!!!...
Your mate elliott set the ball moving and your other mate sticks.. is perpetuating it with shitness!!!...
Shitness in all its glory... brown... sloppy hot stinking shitness...
the club doesnt know how to be a good club.. thats why the AFL have systems in place to help the shit clubs.. without these systems.. (early picks) we would be even worse... than we are now...
Theyre there to help the shit clubs... clubs that would have taken Knobel over Betts... Saddington/OReilly/Hadley/Mott and a galxy of other dead stars
Plus some really shocking drafting and development...