Blue Vain wrote:
Gab wrote:
club29 wrote:
BM123 wrote:
Dan Hannebury 33 touches
Kieran Jack 30 touches
Heath Grundy 32 touches
O'keefe 30 touches
Mcveigh 42 touches
They had five guys who got over 30 touches and we had one ( Walker) Hard to stop Mcveigh when you have 4 other guys tearing to shreds. You could put Gibbs on Mcveigh but then Kennedy would get loose and the ball wouldn't even get in our forward line. Front running forwards who don't like the hard stuff and don't apply pressure is what Ratten has left us. Despite what the stats say we got completely smashed on the outside and the inside except for the last quarter where Sydney stopped. People comparing our game against WC in 2011 need to get a grip. We play Paterson's 10 times better then ANZ and WC weren't as good as Sydney are now. Oooo the shame of losing a semi final against the fourth team when we finished ninth......
So many excuses.
Just admit it. Mick had the Blues under prepared for what was to come, not drilled well enough compared to his opposition coach, used the rubbish long kicking gameplan that hasnt worked with us all season and picked Casboult. Mick had a shocker and was outcoached by Horse who had his team playing like a well oiled machine even with injuries to key players and playing on an ice skating rink..
Why is it so difficult for people to accept that we were just beaten by a better team? You can analyse and dissect things to the degree that you want but it doesn't change the fact that we were never going to be good enough to compete with the top 4 teams in finals.
No excuses necessary, just not good enough.
Couldnt agree more. We weren't good enough.
But that doesnt mean you shouldn't analyse and dissect why. Yes our players were inferior. We should analyse how we fix that. How we restructure the list.
Were our coaches inferior on the night?
Did we play a gamestyle that was conducive to beating the particular opposition? Surely that needs to be analysed and scrutinised as well?
You have to take a holistic approach. Not just say we weren't good enough and forget it.
Everyone should be open to scrutiny. Players, board, coaches, if we want to improve.
Of course everyone is open for scrutiny and i am sure that will happen over the off season.
As far as Saturday goes we went into the game as the inferior team and whilst we may have hoped that we could win if everything went our way nobody could have gone into the game with the expectation that we were going to win. This wasn't a shock result, it pretty much went to script.
What we need to do is look at our list and make some changes no doubt, i am sure there will be a lot of dissecting and analysis take place within the club in the months ahead, all i am saying is that the result of Saturday's game didn't make that any more or less necessary, we were where we are before that point. I don't agree with people calling the performance a disgrace etc, they were just not up to it, simple.