redback wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
:lol:
Does anyone really think our slow starts are by design? Spare me.
Even the players admit the coach gave them a spray about their first half. We'll get smashed if we give Sydney 19 inside 50s in the first quarter.
The knowledgeable ones say malthouse has reinvented the game and he is a genius.
It must be true.
The same ones that have criticised the list all year as not good enough and no longer than 3 weeks ago and in need of a rebuild because Micky told them so.
The same ones enjoying the players exploits on the weekend because Micky told them so.
What will Micky tell them next week that they might digest?

On on the other hand the MM haters will blame him for the losses, and give credit to the list for the wins, and we go around and around again...
You told us we screwed up at selection by not picking Lucas and Casboult therefore reducing our running power and marking ability. How did that work out?
Its the same shit every week. We pick 22 and you all come out screaming that we should have picked the other 18.
If we play 5 talls to 4, we are "too top heavy" if we play 4 talls to 5 "we are going in with a team of midgets".
If we lose its because 'they didn't do what I said they should do' when we win its because 'they are finally doing what I said they should do'.
Give some credit where it is due and acknowledge that perhaps a guy with 30 years experience might have more idea than some of us....