Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 7:24 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1808 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 ... 91  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Either way...

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:53 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
True, but there must be some reason why there is no one left who wants to take up the challenge of turning the club's fortunes around.

Regardless, it's a bit like evolution, the replacement species does not kill off the species it is replacing itself. Sometimes the first is out-competed but usually a species simply comes in from elsewhere or moves up a cog in the food chain and replaces another when the earlier species is already in decline. To apply that here, if Kernahan were to resign, something would happen and someone else would take the Job up. The law of averages suggests they'd do a better job of it, even it only proved to be an interim appointment.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
Pafloyul wrote:
True, but there must be some reason why there is no one left who wants to take up the challenge of turning the club's fortunes around.


There are, but it'd have to be the right time and they'd have to be assured they come on as President...that's not an assurance that anyone at Carlton can give when the likes of the Pratts and Mathiesons believe they should be holding the puppet strings.

I don't trust Carlton to have an amicable clean-out at board level. My preference is for half of the current board remain, some new blood (with a clear, transparent skill-set) to come in and for the son of a former President to become President. Not everyone is going to like that. But the son is very different to the father. Knows a lot of people. Understands the business world. Understands Carlton. Knows the past. Knows the direction needed to go forward. Is charismatic. Has personality. Doesn't mince words. Can build the brand post-150.

Could mix his roles (non-executive director of a private wealth-management group and his 3AW program), lives nearby in Fitzroy. Could manage the ego's of the oligarchy that currently exists. Would have the ear of some very good people who have stayed clear of Carlton for some time.

Tom Elliott is now 43. It's time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24618
Location: Kaloyasena
DocSherrin wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
True, but there must be some reason why there is no one left who wants to take up the challenge of turning the club's fortunes around.


There are, but it'd have to be the right time and they'd have to be assured they come on as President...that's not an assurance that anyone at Carlton can give when the likes of the Pratts and Mathiesons believe they should be holding the puppet strings.

I don't trust Carlton to have an amicable clean-out at board level. My preference is for half of the current board remain, some new blood (with a clear, transparent skill-set) to come in and for the son of a former President to become President. Not everyone is going to like that. But the son is very different to the father. Knows a lot of people. Understands the business world. Understands Carlton. Knows the past. Knows the direction needed to go forward. Is charismatic. Has personality. Doesn't mince words. Can build the brand post-150.

Could mix his roles (non-executive director of a private wealth-management group and his 3AW program), lives nearby in Fitzroy. Could manage the ego's of the oligarchy that currently exists. Would have the ear of some very good people who have stayed clear of Carlton for some time.

Tom Elliott is now 43. It's time.


:wink:

[youtube]a4RbVFXjJf4[/youtube]

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:40 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
Good idea, Doc.

I believe everyone would think he is John's puppet though.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
George Harris wrote:
Good idea, Doc.

I believe everyone would think he is John's puppet though.


Tom is very different to Jack. I think people would see pretty quickly that they're different kind of operators. Time moves pretty quickly. Tom isn't referred to as 'John's boy' anymore. Carlton needs a charismatic personality, a good spokesman, a bloke that people enjoy listening to and don't cringe whenever the President opens his mouth. We need a person who understands the AFL and how it operates, how footy clubs operate, isn't in a bubble and we're happy for him to represent Carlton at any level. Did anyone else hold their breath when Sticks went to the meeting last week to discuss the Essendon* saga?

We've got a bloke in charge who hasn't left the place since he arrived during the 1985 Christmas holidays. If you don't think he's stuck in a bubble - you're sorely mistaken.

I haven't spoken to Tom in a long time. I knew him quite well in the mid-late 90's. But I know people who know him well, and I'll sound them out. Tom was interested in joining the board at the end of 2006. It wasn't the right time then....but it is the right time now. Kernahan, Fried, Clarke, Geminder and Gleeson must go. And at least 3 out of that 5 know it. LoGiudice should have been cut loose over the Chris Judd 'Sovereign Hotels Pokie' affair.

Stuff the advisory board (for now). Let's get some of these people on who are tired of seeing Carlton spinning wheels. I'm losing patience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:58 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Agree Doc

However, there is no way Members would allow an Elliot take over Carlton again.

Unfortunately, Tom is tied with the same brush as John.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:28 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 81
DocSherrin wrote:
George Harris wrote:
Good idea, Doc.

I believe everyone would think he is John's puppet though.


Tom is very different to Jack. I think people would see pretty quickly that they're different kind of operators. Time moves pretty quickly. Tom isn't referred to as 'John's boy' anymore. Carlton needs a charismatic personality, a good spokesman, a bloke that people enjoy listening to and don't cringe whenever the President opens his mouth. We need a person who understands the AFL and how it operates, how footy clubs operate, isn't in a bubble and we're happy for him to represent Carlton at any level. Did anyone else hold their breath when Sticks went to the meeting last week to discuss the Essendon** saga?

We've got a bloke in charge who hasn't left the place since he arrived during the 1985 Christmas holidays. If you don't think he's stuck in a bubble - you're sorely mistaken.

I haven't spoken to Tom in a long time. I knew him quite well in the mid-late 90's. But I know people who know him well, and I'll sound them out. Tom was interested in joining the board at the end of 2006. It wasn't the right time then....but it is the right time now. Kernahan, Fried, Clarke, Geminder and Gleeson must go. And at least 3 out of that 5 know it. LoGiudice should have been cut loose over the Chris Judd 'Sovereign Hotels Pokie' affair.

Stuff the advisory board (for now). Let's get some of these people on who are tired of seeing Carlton spinning wheels. I'm losing patience.


X2- I know Tom through my brother and he would be an outstanding choice as the president- as for Mosquito's reservations, as much as I empathise, I think these days most members are willing to see past the Jack and embrace Tom as a new Elliott. Also, times are such that we can't afford to dither with Sticks (and his endless supply of Crownies-fuelled quotes.... :roll: )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Agree Doc

However, there is no way Members would allow an Elliot take over Carlton again.

Unfortunately, Tom is tied with the same brush as John.


tarred? Well - they should perhaps get over it. Because the future of Kernahan (2008*-2014), Richard Newton (2015-2016) and Craig Mathieson (2017- ? )....doesn't look bright. Might as well have a cardboard cutout sitting in the chair.

You know how other clubs have either photos of Past-Presidents or Premiership glory in their board room? Carlton has a large picture of Richard Pratt standing in front of a waterfall. How @#$%&! appropriate...

Don't go chasing waterfalls.
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to.
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all,
But I think you're moving too fast.


It's sad. It's very, very sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
I would love to see Tom Elliot as president. I tweeted the same thoughts directly to him a few weeks ago.

Maybe if he receives enough interest and show of support from members, he might make a push for it. Lets hope so! :thumbsup:

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:50 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Image

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:57 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13686
I'm not happy with jack, but I'd love Tom to be president and I think others would follow suit provided jack is told in no uncertain terms that he should not get involved in the lobbying of his sons presidential race.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
bluechucky wrote:
I'm not happy with jack, but I'd love Tom to be president and I think others would follow suit provided jack is told in no uncertain terms that he should not get involved in the lobbying of his sons presidential race.


That's the easy part. The hardest part is convincing Bruce Mathieson that he can't run the club from the Gold Coast, even though he has locked us into a very risky debt management plan. It's time to put the egos to one side. Like Craig Mathieson, Jeanne Pratt is welcome to stay on the board. But one Pratt will suffice - particularly when the son-in-law's input is so minimal and he has a clear lack of understanding of the Carlton Football Club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
DocSherrin wrote:
bluechucky wrote:
I'm not happy with jack, but I'd love Tom to be president and I think others would follow suit provided jack is told in no uncertain terms that he should not get involved in the lobbying of his sons presidential race.


That's the easy part. The hardest part is convincing Bruce Mathieson that he can't run the club from the Gold Coast, even though he has locked us into a very risky debt management plan. It's time to put the egos to one side. Like Craig Mathieson, Jeanne Pratt is welcome to stay on the board. But one Pratt will suffice - particularly when the son-in-law's input is so minimal and he has a clear lack of understanding of the Carlton Football Club.


What debt do we have?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:08 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 9:07 am
Posts: 119
I'm not so sure that its so cut and dried that Newton will take over from Sticks.

Sticks does want Newton as he sees him as a mate and someone who will 'look after his legacy'. I know I find that fanciful as well - but it is important for Sticks to be seen in a positive light - thats all he has.

Swan needs Newton as well - as then the status quo doesn't change for him - he gets do keep doing his cushy CEO job without putting in any great effort to be innovative or try to get ahead of the curve.

The board does need a shake up and the only person on in who wants the job and will reshape the board is Fahour. Newton v Fahour. Newton may have the numbers at the moment but things can change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
The 19 tram wrote:
I'm not so sure that its so cut and dried that Newton will take over from Sticks.

Sticks does want Newton as he sees him as a mate and someone who will 'look after his legacy'. I know I find that fanciful as well - but it is important for Sticks to be seen in a positive light - thats all he has.

Swan needs Newton as well - as then the status quo doesn't change for him - he gets do keep doing his cushy CEO job without putting in any great effort to be innovative or try to get ahead of the curve.

The board does need a shake up and the only person on in who wants the job and will reshape the board is Fahour. Newton v Fahour. Newton may have the numbers at the moment but things can change.


Fahour will not get the Presidency

What money and ideas does he bring to the Club?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 9:07 am
Posts: 119
He doesn't bring any personal money. Personal money shouldn't be a prerequisite for being President.

What he does bring is the capacity to get people to work for him, clearer governance (there's that word again) and ability to make the club and the people that work for it more accountable.

Koch doesn't bring money to Port, nor McGuire to Collingwood.

People bringing money to this club and then thinking that money is the only answer is a large part of the current problem...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Tom Elliott seems sound enough for me :)

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/3aw-drive-b ... 2st64.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 7:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Give me Tom anyday....

Fahour can stay because most of the othhrs dont like him..and if they dont like something its good.. and if they do like it its not good....

so fahour stays just on that

the others should all go

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Need a president and ceo who can create an Eco-system that breeds success, great place to be at, and and high performance.

This board needs to be held accountable and the sooner the blowtorch is put on them, the better.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1808 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 ... 91  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 128 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group