TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Warby wrote:
I realise that mate......I keep thinking of losing Kennedy to get Juddy who is/was magnificent but....gee; it was a bigger price than we thought at the time.
Two different things Kennedy was part of a trade - a trade which I agree with you that we payed overs for, Picks 3 & 20 should have been enough to get it down, giving Kennedy was just pulling our pants down, and seeing him killing it at WC just makes it worse.
We wouldn't be giving up Betts in a trade like we did with Kennedy. We gave away Kennedy by choice, under Free Trade there is really no choice.

Re-writing history again.
We did not give him away by choice.
Picks 3 & 20 weren't going to get it done. There was never any suggestion it would.
What are you talking about??
Please don't take issue with me every time you think you can score a point?
Your tiresome and boring.

Score a point?
Stop re-writing history and I'll stop pointing out you're wrong.
Speaking of boring and tiresome...mentioning the Judd trade or Jordan Murdoch every chance you get....?
Brad I have never tried to re-write history as you constantly an boringly always seem to assert.
I have never said that we lost out on the Judd trade nor have I ever said we shouldn't have done it.
All I have ever said is that we overpaid on the deal, you may not agree and frankly I dont give a tuppeny flower if you do or dont.
There are many people on this board whose opinion I value, you are not one of those.