Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 8:38 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
AGRO wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Warby wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Warby, under free agency if Eddie wants to go he goes. Doesnt matter whether you or I or the club don't want to lose a good player or not.


I realise that mate......I keep thinking of losing Kennedy to get Juddy who is/was magnificent but....gee; it was a bigger price than we thought at the time.


Two different things Kennedy was part of a trade - a trade which I agree with you that we payed overs for, Picks 3 & 20 should have been enough to get it down, giving Kennedy was just pulling our pants down, and seeing him killing it at WC just makes it worse.

We wouldn't be giving up Betts in a trade like we did with Kennedy. We gave away Kennedy by choice, under Free Trade there is really no choice. :mad:


Re-writing history again.

We did not give him away by choice.

Picks 3 & 20 weren't going to get it done. There was never any suggestion it would.



What are you talking about??

Please don't take issue with me every time you think you can score a point?

Your tiresome and boring. :roll:


Score a point?

Stop re-writing history and I'll stop pointing out you're wrong.

Speaking of boring and tiresome...mentioning the Judd trade or Jordan Murdoch every chance you get....?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Supporters fatalism towards the Judd trade is tiresome and boring. So is the same attitude displayed toward any/every trade the club has done since the draft came in to being. If we think the list is not nearly as strong as it should be then any argument as to why that might be should be fair game.

Protectionism is hardly better than denial in my opinion.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:59 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Love Eddie but fact is we have a surplus in his position and young Bucks could well be another FP one day

Club needs to get smarter with list management and recruiting

Right now we have too many slowish, tough but unskilled tagging mids and one too many FPs

And we have too few big bodied quality mids and too few quality KPPs

Doesn't take a genius to figure out what we need to do


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Forget the Judd thing

What's done is done

Don't look in the rear vision mirror else ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
The Judd/Kennedy trade was a win/win. WCE will yield a longer benefit from it, but as a club we needed a Judd to arrive and help instil professionalism into the playing group as well breath life into a club who had been down and out for over half a decade - a flag was just going to be a bonus whilst he was here.

We need to focus on the here and now and what we can control. It's what we do with trading and drafting and looking at the game plan and the types we need that support the game plan MM has for us.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Wangers wrote:
The Judd/Kennedy trade was a win/win. WCE will yield a longer benefit from it, but as a club we needed a Judd to arrive and help instil professionalism into the playing group as well breath life into a club who had been down and out for over half a decade - a flag was just going to be a bonus whilst he was here.

We need to focus on the here and now and what we can control. It's what we do with trading and drafting and looking at the game plan and the types we need that support the game plan MM has for us.


Spot on.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:31 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 283
Wangers wrote:
The Judd/Kennedy trade was a win/win. WCE will yield a longer benefit from it, but as a club we needed a Judd to arrive and help instil professionalism into the playing group as well breath life into a club who had been down and out for over half a decade - a flag was just going to be a bonus whilst he was here.

We need to focus on the here and now and what we can control. It's what we do with trading and drafting and looking at the game plan and the types we need that support the game plan MM has for us.




Spot on, i will never understand how anybody could ever suggest the Judd acquisition wasn't anything but good for this club. He brought a level of professionalism and leadership to the playing group which had been sadly lacking for a long time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:49 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Sugarcane wrote:
Love Eddie but fact is we have a surplus in his position and young Bucks could well be another FP one day

Club needs to get smarter with list management and recruiting

Right now we have too many slowish, tough but unskilled tagging mids and one too many FPs

And we have too few big bodied quality mids and too few quality KPPs

Doesn't take a genius to figure out what we need to do


..no it doesn't.. ..more miles into the legs of the 3 amigo's.. ..jeffy and yazz most definitely can be playing a high hf/wing role moving ahead, and yazz especially with a bigger engine should move into the middle, even if just part of the 2nd string.. .... ..for one reason or another betts doesnt seem to have a big enough engine, but in bursts in the middle he can help as well.. .... ..i think we've got plenty on our list to move on, ahead of those with actual talent..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:05 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Warby wrote:
I realise that mate......I keep thinking of losing Kennedy to get Juddy who is/was magnificent but....gee; it was a bigger price than we thought at the time.


Two different things Kennedy was part of a trade - a trade which I agree with you that we payed overs for, Picks 3 & 20 should have been enough to get it down, giving Kennedy was just pulling our pants down, and seeing him killing it at WC just makes it worse.

We wouldn't be giving up Betts in a trade like we did with Kennedy. We gave away Kennedy by choice, under Free Trade there is really no choice. :mad:


Re-writing history again.

We did not give him away by choice.

Picks 3 & 20 weren't going to get it done. There was never any suggestion it would.



What are you talking about??

Please don't take issue with me every time you think you can score a point?

Your tiresome and boring. :roll:


Score a point?

Stop re-writing history and I'll stop pointing out you're wrong.

Speaking of boring and tiresome...mentioning the Judd trade or Jordan Murdoch every chance you get....?



Brad I have never tried to re-write history as you constantly an boringly always seem to assert.

I have never said that we lost out on the Judd trade nor have I ever said we shouldn't have done it.

All I have ever said is that we overpaid on the deal, you may not agree and frankly I dont give a tuppeny flower if you do or dont.

There are many people on this board whose opinion I value, you are not one of those.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:59 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
What we don't need at the draft is any more HBF's or small Forwards or Ruckmen.

I will be interesting to see whether we stuff things up again.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:43 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
BigBlueWave wrote:
What we don't need at the draft is any more HBF's or small Forwards or Ruckmen.

I will be interesting to see whether we stuff things up again.


Probably MMs fault.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2063
Gab wrote:
Wangers wrote:
The Judd/Kennedy trade was a win/win. WCE will yield a longer benefit from it, but as a club we needed a Judd to arrive and help instil professionalism into the playing group as well breath life into a club who had been down and out for over half a decade - a flag was just going to be a bonus whilst he was here.

We need to focus on the here and now and what we can control. It's what we do with trading and drafting and looking at the game plan and the types we need that support the game plan MM has for us.




Spot on, i will never understand how anybody could ever suggest the Judd acquisition wasn't anything but good for this club. He brought a level of professionalism and leadership to the playing group which had been sadly lacking for a long time.


Kennedy's impact on WCE has been nowhere near the impact Judd has had on Carlton

If WCE had the chance to retain Judd at the time instead of proceeding with the trade, they would have taken it in a heartbeat (even in hindsight)

Kennedy is a good player but too many overrate him on this site


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Wangers wrote:
The Judd/Kennedy trade was a win/win. WCE will yield a longer benefit from it, but as a club we needed a Judd to arrive and help instil professionalism into the playing group as well breath life into a club who had been down and out for over half a decade - a flag was just going to be a bonus whilst he was here.

We need to focus on the here and now and what we can control. It's what we do with trading and drafting and looking at the game plan and the types we need that support the game plan MM has for us.


No it's not, it's about learning from our mistakes and making sure we don't make them again. What suits Mick's game plan and what is ultimately good enough to get the job done are not necessarily mutually inclusive.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
AGRO wrote:
There are many people on this board whose opinion I value, you are not one of those.


You think I care if you value my opinion?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:05 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
dane wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
What we don't need at the draft is any more HBF's or small Forwards or Ruckmen.

I will be interesting to see whether we stuff things up again.


Probably MMs fault.

Super duper post Dane-o

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:14 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
There are many people on this board whose opinion I value, you are not one of those.


You think I care if you value my opinion?




Do you think I care if you're even breathing?

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:16 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Do I detect a mod and a punter throwing personal barbs around?

Tsk Tsk.

No offence to Barb of course.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
AGRO wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
There are many people on this board whose opinion I value, you are not one of those.


You think I care if you value my opinion?




Do you think I care if you're even breathing?


:lol:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 11:32 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8176
dane wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
What we don't need at the draft is any more HBF's or small Forwards or Ruckmen.

I will be interesting to see whether we stuff things up again.


Probably MMs fault.


:grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19473
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Today's game clearly demonstrates why we need to try to draft a key forward with our first pick.

Like a lot of weeks, dominated inside 50s but couldn't capitalize on it.

Poor conversion was one part of today's game, but don't neglect to look at our inability to dominate the air up forward.

Henderson is good on the lead however we need someone to partner him.

At the moment the club does not have anyone capable of partnering Henderson.

A key forward must be a priority with the first pick.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pecker and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group