doofdoof wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Carrazzo is playing OK. Like most of our midfield rotation, he's doing defensive roles. His job on Swallow was successful and he kept Swallow to 20 possies.
At some stage hopefully Mick will realise you cant keep tagging all the opposition players and be a successful team.
Gibbs on Ziebell was a farce. Sorry but Ziebell hasnt been that good.
Hopefully against GC we'll tag Ablett with Carrazzo, O'Meara with Curnow and let the others actually run a proper midfield combination.
At the moment Murphy and Judd are our only midfielders with a mindset of winning the ball.
Not only does it limit our ball winning, it gives the opposition the upper hand in the midfield structure. If Cachia cant contribute with purely tagging, drop him and bring in Graham.
Put Simpson back to the attacking wing as he has rediscovered his form and confidence after having his jaw smashed last year. Some of his marks were ultra courageous Fridaty night. It will also release Scotland back to his defensive wing role.
We have to see if he can cut it still as he's struggling minding a man. Perform or make way for someone else time for Scotland.
My team, bring in Robbo and Graham. Forget the bullshit forward tag for Robinson and place him, Graham and Gibbs into an offensive midfield rotation.
I forward tag (Armfield), 2 midfield tags (Ablett, O'Meara) and actually go out to win the ball.
Lets be honest, if North had kicked half straight when they dominated the game, they would have beaten us easily.
We cant expect to win many games winning 290 possessions. Once again we won the contested possessions but got smashed at the uncontested. Release some of the tags.
are they really tags or is mm trying to instil a man on man mindset?
weve only really known how to run one way so maybe still too hard for our players to grasp when to run forward v when to run back & theyre playing safe as a consequence.
just a theory
I agree.
We're getting smashed at the uncontested footy because our players are unsure when to run and spread.
I disagree about the concept of our players running one way though. The key is structural. They were being caught out because they are working hard to spread and create. (Which is what you want, hard running ball winners) Unfortunately our forward structure was unable to capitalise and the ball came out as fast as it went in. It also shows their opponents were refusing to chase and won the easy ball on the rebound. Its common at all clubs, (including Collingwood under Malthouse) not just ours.
With Henderson taking contested marks and Rowe giving a contest, we should have faith in our forwards to create a contest and lock the ball in.
Therefore the key should be to win more of the footy and give them more supply. You wont get that running defensive players all over the ground. And let's be honest, the players who are known for lacking a defensive game are still the ones allowed to run around on their own.