Effes wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Effes, Blue Vain, Big Blue Wave:
You are terrible judges of coaches and coaching. If you want a fair assessment of Ratten V Malthouse & just use numerical comparisons Give Malthouse the same 116 games that Ratten had. I will tell you what give Malthouse 4 Full seasons less than 116 games. That is if you want to take away all of your biases.
You must have failed reading comprehension MJ.
Read the posts again.
Why should Malthouse be given 5 years?
He's a million dollar coach and Ratten wasn't.
He's a premiership coach and ratten wasn't.
His players respect him and play for him and Rattens don't.
He's a 30 year experience coach and Ratten wasn't.
He's a great tactician and Ratten wasn't.
He didn't take over a wooden spoon side to rebuild Ratten did.
Ross Lyon is a great coach too

who hasn't won a premiership either and had the list at their prime then left them with a dilapidated list and nothing to show for it.
Is that the outcome of giving Malthouse 5 years or is it to rebuild the list that is very competitive and have improved by all accounts by Malthouse fans?
If we are so competitive and haven’t lost by more than 17 points to the best teams and Malthouse has only been in charge for 12 games and still learning the players then by the second half of the year we should be pushing top four and a premiership chance without the need of a rebuild.
That’s going by Malthouse's fans assumptions and the graphical improvement of the group over the past 7 rounds.