eric pascoe wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
eric pascoe wrote:
Maybe I've been on Mars, as I was sitting in the AFL Members last Friday, and didn't see any of this Yaz stuff.
As I understand it, he has apologised for his body language ( Wow, Richo dodged a few bullets there)
I love Mick but seriously why was he the sub in the first place?
Eddie, who got rubbed out for three weeks and was not fined by the club, ought to have been the sub.
Team balance? Yaz can go forward, back and midfield. Eddie can do two of those.
Complete howler by the coaching panel and it cost us 4 points against the lab rats.
I think the coaching panel should apologise.
We don't know why he was made sub.
Fitness, internal issue, not meeting kpi's that have been set and it may have just been a tactic. If it was a tactic its a curious one but it had no chance to succeed because the player didn't do his part.
Makes no difference really, he didn't do enough when he got his chance.
Fair point but we really have not heard any logical justification as to why he was made the sub in the first place. Eddie ( and I love him ) hadn't played for weeks. It just beggars belief that Yaz was made the sub and I want to know why other than "team balance". If it were for something other than that, please, coaching panel, tell us. Otherwise, it's a howler and has somehow flown under the attention of all and sundry. It was just a staggering decision and I want to know why it was made. No one on this site seems to want to address this and they keep trotting out the line about some statement needs to be made. FFS we are playing Hawthorn tomorrow. It's pretty serious.
I felt the same way EP, and as some mentioned a niggle, I hoped that was why.
I am keeping an open mind with Mick. I don't like him didn't want him, but I'm going with it, because I support Carlton. I was worried that MMwould dig in on this, and he has. Is it his pride, or is it an unresolved issue? I have to believe that it's for the best, as many here do. Really, we are in the dark about it.
I dislike strongly, the repeated use of 'lazy' when some describe Yaz. It makes me uncomfortable. Maybe Yaz is a burst player, like Waitey.
I was disappointed that he's not in, and feel sick about facing Hawks.
I'm worried about Bootsma, when we could have Yaz, and now some say we might get Rowe to replace Carrots. Geez. I'm close to putting up a page of headbangs, but...
I hold out hope that the coaching staff have a clue, and want to smash these smug pric*s and their smug supporters as much as I do.
I can't even go to the game after last week. Everything hurts..the TV is in grave danger for it's life tonite.
For the record, I reckon Yaz would have played his guts out tonite, lesson learned.
After all, Waitey improved after a blast and a fine. Yaz already had the blast, the humiliation, and has apologised.