R7: St Kilda v Carlton (pre-match/final changes p22)

RickJ · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 6:38 pm

Effes wrote:

Ray Chamberlain

Milne 5 frees for, 4 goals, 1 free against (plus 50m for abuse)

bluechampion · **Joined:** Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm **Posts:** 3457

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland

INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

Captain Dan · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 6:40 pm

Hampson getting a game again.

Blues Clues · **Joined:** Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm **Posts:** 2099

jim wrote:

There's the 3 ruckman in the starting 18. What type of idiots are we?????

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland
INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

The flowering idiot is Waite, maybe forced to play Kreuzer as a tall fwd to plug the hole. Leaves us pretty unbalanced if it fails. :yikes:

MM must think we can exploit their tall backs, especially without Gilbert.

jim · **Joined:** Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm **Posts:** 8206

Blues Clues wrote:

jim wrote:

There's the 3 ruckman in the starting 18. What type of idiots are we?????

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland
INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

The flowering idiot is Waite, maybe forced to play Kreuzer as a tall fwd to plug the hole. Leaves us pretty unbalanced if it fails. :yikes:

MM must think we can exploit their tall backs, especially without Gilbert.

Yes Waite is the flower idiot, but you play Casboult instead and leave out one of the ruckmen.

Rexy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am **Posts:** 28227

looks like Kreuzer and Carrotts in for Waite and Cachia

in8 · **Joined:** Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am **Posts:** 356

More Ratten than Ratten.

Kouta · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 6:53 pm

Captain Dan wrote:

Hampson getting a game again.

Do you even watch Carlton?

I bet you're in the cheer squad too.

Synbad · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 6:57 pm

Kouta wrote:

Captain Dan wrote:

Hampson getting a game again.

Do you even watch Carlton?

I bet you're in the cheer squad too.

explain yourself......

Drewgirl · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm **Posts:** 4771

3 ruck men. Mistake I reckon. We need to play a running game against them.

bondiblue · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 7:09 pm

jim wrote:

Blues Clues wrote:

jim wrote:

There's the 3 ruckman in the starting 18. What type of idiots are we?????

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland
INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

The flowering idiot is Waite, maybe forced to play Kreuzer as a tall fwd to plug the hole. Leaves us pretty unbalanced if it fails. :yikes:

MM must think we can exploit their tall backs, especially without Gilbert.

Yes Waite is the flower idiot, but you play Casboult instead and leave out one of the ruckmen.

That's your opinion jim.

I know your argument, and understand where you are coming from, but it's just an opinion: yours.

I value Kreuzer more than Casboult as a forward for many reasons...its just an opinion: mine.

Unlike you I don't know for sure who is right, but lets drop the "idiots" stuff ...MM knows a lot more than you and I and the whole of TC combined about the plan for this week and for the rest of the year. I have faith.

Is the problem Hampson being selected? Maybe.
But MM values him for his own reasons...you and I are not privy to.

We'll win....by a good margin...more than 40 points...we owe these guys some pain...a lot of pain.

Enjoy

camel · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 7:10 pm

jim wrote:

There's the 3 ruckman in the starting 18. What type of idiots are we?????

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland
INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

If they're going to keep naming Army at CHB they could at least slot Eddie in at CHF. :razz:

Captain Dan · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 7:16 pm

Kouta wrote:

Captain Dan wrote:

Hampson getting a game again.

Do you even watch Carlton?

I bet you're in the cheer squad too.

Yes.

No.

SnickerS · **Joined:** Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm **Posts:** 1472

Three rucks against McEvoy??

are they serious??

JackWorrall · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 7:19 pm

Kruezer in the forward line sits ok with me. When playing with the Northern Knights he played CHF and he's a good kick for goal, not to mention a damn good mark.

jim · **Joined:** Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm **Posts:** 8206

bondiblue wrote:

jim wrote:

Blues Clues wrote:

jim wrote:

There's the 3 ruckman in the starting 18. What type of idiots are we?????

B: C.Yarran M.Jamison L.Henderson
HB: Z.Tuohy D.Armfield S.White
C: K.Lucas M.Robinson D.Ellard
HF: C.Judd A.Walker J.Garlett
F: E.Curnow S.Hampson M.Kreuzer
FOLL: R.Warnock M.Murphy H.Scotland
INT (FROM): K.Simpson, B.McLean, E.Betts, J.Cachia, A.Carrazzo, L.Casboult & A.Joseph

The flowering idiot is Waite, maybe forced to play Kreuzer as a tall fwd to plug the hole. Leaves us pretty unbalanced if it fails. :yikes:

MM must think we can exploit their tall backs, especially without Gilbert.

Yes Waite is the flower idiot, but you play Casboult instead and leave out one of the ruckmen.

That's your opinion jim.

I know your argument, and understand where you are coming from, but it's just an opinion: yours.

I value Kreuzer more than Casboult as a forward for many reasons...its just an opinion: mine.

Unlike you I don't know for sure who is right, but lets drop the "idiots" stuff ...MM knows a lot more than you and I and the whole of TC combined about the plan for this week and for the rest of the year. I have faith.

Is the problem Hampson being selected? Maybe.
But MM values him for his own reasons...you and I are not privy to.

We'll win....by a good margin...more than 40 points...we owe these guys some pain...a lot of pain.

Enjoy

I'm thinking it's more than my opinion. It's been proven time and again that 3 ruckmen rarely works. No ifs or buts there. If you go down that path again when you know it doesn't work then you deserve to called an idiot. That's in any form of life if you repeat your mistakes.

Casboult should be in for Hampson once Kreuzer came back as the latter is one of the first picked.

Drewgirl · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm **Posts:** 4771

They have bought in some runners as well. What are we thinking?

SnickerS · **Joined:** Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm **Posts:** 1472

JackWorrall wrote:

Kruezer in the forward line sits ok with me. When playing with the Northern Knights he played CHF and he's a good kick for goal, not to mention a damn good mark.

He isn't a good forward at all.

Juddy&theKruezers · **Joined:** Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm **Posts:** 4426

Looking at the Saints lineup we should win this one comfortably....

JackWorrall · **Posted:** Thu May 09, 2013 7:47 pm

SnickerS wrote:

JackWorrall wrote:

Kruezer in the forward line sits ok with me. When playing with the Northern Knights he played CHF and he's a good kick for goal, not to mention a damn good mark.

He isn't a good forward at all.

Why? He's a good contested mark, a good kick and has played the role.

R7: St Kilda v Carlton (pre-match/final changes p22)

Who is online