keogh wrote:
Yeah but which specific games did they try to lose
Where talking about specific games
not crap seasons from crap teams
Well you could look at many games in the 2010 season for starters- but how about this one (as per the link below vs Port)...but keep in mind you won't find any EVIDENCE of tanking. It is just a whole lot of odd team selections that just happen to happen when one is "experimenting".
West Coast lost this round 2 match to Port by under a goal and then lost the return match by under a goal in round 20. I guess it was just a lot of "fortunate coincidences" that West Coast ended up with four wins for the season. (much like Gillard and the AWU situation there seems to be a lot of "fortunate coincidences")
Also keep in mind that I don't want West Coast investigated. I think the farce of priority picks is now over- the rule has been changed, let's forget it as we won't know where it ends and will only do damage to the brand. If Carlton is investigated AGAIN (they found no evidence), though, then I think we should have an equal investigation into West Coast, Hawthorn and Collingwood.
http://www.watoday.com.au/afl/afl-news/ ... -rl1t.html"The starkly practical call to drop Quinten Lynch from the match which would have seen him equal Glen Jakovich's record for consecutive games for the club was the talking point throughout Perth, overshadowing Warren Tredrea's 250th game.
That decision was made all the more odd with Mark LeCras already sidelined by a sore hamstring. If Worsfold had a plan C for his forward line, it was not apparent.
Kennedy's lone forward furrow was a fruitful one, with his four goals keeping the home side in the contest along with Nic Naitanui's efforts. But his tally for the match was equaled by Davenport in the final term."
And you thought West Coast was a "crap team". In 2011 they came 4th with 17 wins, the previous season they won 4. That is quite a turnaround for a "crap team".