People's Elbow wrote:
I AM... COMPLETELY UNDERWHELMED.
So the big 'stop everything' 10am thing was just to announce a new membership campaign with an already existing slogan?
Speaking of which, am I the only one that finds "I AM" to be part of the problem?
If I've learned one thing from Sydney on the weekend it's that "WE ARE" is the better option.
I'm with you, elbow. Couldn't agree more.
You keep this shit simple.
Our song starts with the words 'We are the Navy Blues'.
The song uses the collective 'We' five times. We love the song: the song is possibly our second most important brand asset, behind the jumper.
Like Pavlov's dog, when we hear the song, we get emotional. We remember the boys singing it after a win. We hear it after every victory. We crave it. Those who are old enough, get choked up a bit when we hear it, because it reminds us of great deeds.
Like Collingwood used 'Side by Side' (admittedly as an emergency replacement for their disastrous 'I am beautiful' or whatever it was campaign).
You shouldn't be clever with this. Allegiance to a footy club is a base thing, purely emotional. Play off that, use the assets you have, and be consistent.
Why pay a pretty average advertising agency to come up with something that's half as good as what we've already got? Makes no sense.
If I headed up the CFC marketing sub-committee, I'd be saying 'we're not here to invent: we're here to identify our heart & soul assets, and amplify the hell out of them'.
I AM Carlton is individualistic and boastful, and emotionally impotent. Just another slogan in a sea of slogans, and a missed opportunity. It says what you are, it doesn't say what we are.
But I guess it reflects where the club has been: not very good at creating a sense of inclusiveness. So perhaps it's honest, I'll give it that.