Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:28 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Damn. J&K, you beat me to it. Just saw it. :-)

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Ahmed caught up in MLC debacle

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sacke ... 265in.html

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
moshe25 wrote:
Damn. J&K, you beat me to it. Just saw it. :-)

:lol: :thumbsup:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
I don't know much about Fahour, my view is tinged a little by reports on here about his ruthlessness. Sure, I think we might need a bit of that for our fearless leader, but I don't want ruthlesseness for powers sake. I want a firm hand with a clear head (sounds a little like the Friday Night Lights football team slogan :donk: )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18647
Location: threeohfivethree
woof wrote:
Stamos wrote:

Yep, this is extremely dodgy and there is a lot more to play out.
Not sure anyone on the MLC board is looking too good at the moment.


The way I read it is that she was asked to explain the overpayment, she can't explain it and therefore she was not entitled to it. She has then been asked to pay it back and she won't or can't do it.
See you later.
In terms of Fahour, I think Italian Blue's reasoning looks the most logical.


This is the problem with the speed of our media cycle. Your assumption's fair enough based on the initial story released by the board but based on what Storelli's come out with today this one's got a fair way to go and the board have a whole lot of explaining to do.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Ok, tidied up the thread, please stick to the topic or a weeks break might be applied.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 1689
Ahmed was never the CEO of NAB.

He was the CEO of the Australian operations - big difference.

His role at NAB was very senior, very important and very powerful but not CEO of NAB.

NAB is and was at the time a global business, much more so than any of the other 3 big Australian banks.

Ahmed wanted the NAB Group CEO role - he didn't succeed.

He is a good businessman. He is strong and very influential. He is also very supportive of HIS people. His brother rose rapidly through the ranks of the Aust NAB business beyond his years. He is now a senior exec at Aust Post.

Ahmed would be a strong addition to the board but not the panacea of all Carlton's ills.

_________________
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18647
Location: threeohfivethree
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Ahmed was never the CEO of NAB.

He was the CEO of the Australian operations - big difference.

His role at NAB was very senior, very important and very powerful but not CEO of NAB.

NAB is and was at the time a global business, much more so than any of the other 3 big Australian banks.

Ahmed wanted the NAB Group CEO role - he didn't succeed.

He is a good businessman. He is strong and very influential. He is also very supportive of HIS people. His brother rose rapidly through the ranks of the Aust NAB business beyond his years. He is now a senior exec at Aust Post.

Ahmed would be a strong addition to the board but not the panacea of all Carlton's ills.


Well he's not much use at Visy Park if he's not the messiah!

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
Mrs Caz wrote:
I don't know much about Fahour, my view is tinged a little by reports on here about his ruthlessness. Sure, I think we might need a bit of that for our fearless leader, but I don't want ruthlesseness for powers sake. I want a firm hand with a clear head (sounds a little like the Friday Night Lights football team slogan :donk: )


I'm with you. What I want is a president with a clear head. More things go wrong at football clubs than go right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:05 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:50 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Strathmore
Ran into someone today who worked with AF and he was very complimentary.
He was ruthless on upholding cultural values, anyone who did not take them seriously got the arse or left because it started to impact their pay. His words were "overnight the culture of place changed and the place became a much happier place to work"
Also mentioned he has a real presence about it.

_________________
'‘He had an enormous capacity to pump himself up and get the best out of himself when it mattered. He had a fire in his belly – a passion for the contest like few other players’' -- D Parkin in reference to the dominator


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:18 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 436
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Ahmed was never the CEO of NAB.

He was the CEO of the Australian operations - big difference.

His role at NAB was very senior, very important and very powerful but not CEO of NAB.

NAB is and was at the time a global business, much more so than any of the other 3 big Australian banks.

Ahmed wanted the NAB Group CEO role - he didn't succeed.

He is a good businessman. He is strong and very influential. He is also very supportive of HIS people. His brother rose rapidly through the ranks of the Aust NAB business beyond his years. He is now a senior exec at Aust Post.

Ahmed would be a strong addition to the board but not the panacea of all Carlton's ills.


So the inference being, the acquisition of Ahmed to the Board may going by past trends lead to more employment opportunities at Carlton for his brother. Interesting times ahead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:42 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Phoenix wrote:
bluechucky wrote:
Ahmed was blocked initially by the NAB chairman.


Bingo!
That was the real reason and I heard it myself straight from the horses mouth.

Ahmed, would have otherwise put his hand up for a board position.



I think the "neighs' have it.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:44 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Synbad wrote:
Just for people who have no idea how footy clubs work.....
Carlton was a very Protestant club and very anti everything else.(Talk to Elliott or Lofts.. they were anti Catholic.. anti Jewish.. anti Orthodox and anti everthing else... unless it was for the good of the footy club...
Some of these barriers may have been broken down over the years... but they can also exist cos its human nature to be !@#$%&!!!..


At this risk of boring you, what Synbad is saying is correct its normal human behavior..
For those that think that this argument is over simplified consider the following.
The most fundamental of human needs outside of the physical needs that sustain physical life is the need to belong followed by the need to differentiate within a group. Human beings are socially dependent creatures and a social Groups (including the CFC board of directors) drive the behavior its members (a right of passage so to speak that reaffirms the individuals place within the team). All groups (even this forum) are made up of 1)super-typical s, 2) typical s and 3)sub-typical s. The characteristics of the super-typical are emulated by the typical's who in turn are themselves emulated by the sub-typical s.
Its a case of consciously following the leader in order to ensure survival.
The group cloisters (shuts down open access) in order to preserve its power-- Its a little like the moderators in here.
As much as human beings profess and strive for non discriminatory behavior, its an innate survival mechanism. So yeah its totally possible that a football board made up predominately of Catholics or Jewish member's may for innate social reasons block the introduction of a new leader (say of different belief) if that prospective is different in someway that is a major factor in binding the current organisation. The solution is to prevent cloistering and ensure objective based external transparency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:25 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:36 am
Posts: 193
DenimUndies wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Just for people who have no idea how footy clubs work.....
Carlton was a very Protestant club and very anti everything else.(Talk to Elliott or Lofts.. they were anti Catholic.. anti Jewish.. anti Orthodox and anti everthing else... unless it was for the good of the footy club...
Some of these barriers may have been broken down over the years... but they can also exist cos its human nature to be !@#$%&!!!..


At this risk of boring you, what Synbad is saying is correct its normal human behavior..
For those that think that this argument is over simplified consider the following.
The most fundamental of human needs outside of the physical needs that sustain physical life is the need to belong followed by the need to differentiate within a group. Human beings are socially dependent creatures and a social Groups (including the CFC board of directors) drive the behavior its members (a right of passage so to speak that reaffirms the individuals place within the team). All groups (even this forum) are made up of 1)super-typical s, 2) typical s and 3)sub-typical s. The characteristics of the super-typical are emulated by the typical's who in turn are themselves emulated by the sub-typical s.
Its a case of consciously following the leader in order to ensure survival.
The group cloisters (shuts down open access) in order to preserve its power-- Its a little like the moderators in here.
As much as human beings profess and strive for non discriminatory behavior, its an innate survival mechanism. So yeah its totally possible that a football board made up predominately of Catholics or Jewish member's may for innate social reasons block the introduction of a new leader (say of different belief) if that prospective is different in someway that is a major factor in binding the current organisation. The solution is to prevent cloistering and ensure objective based external transparency.


I hear whispers that the super-typicals are proposing a change to the CFC logo, to the Skull And Bones........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:07 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Ahmed is now a CFC board member - further discussion here - viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32293


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group