Blue Sombrero wrote:
Well, it's done and dusted.
The sakc Ratts posters have had their way.
The MM camp may well get their way.
I for one wiould like to go on record as thinking this is a huge mistake. I am firmly in the camp that says we would have made the top 4 apart from injuries this year.
Respectfully, I disagree with you.
I'll point to some games I was at, that refute your argument and show that something was VERY wrong.
Adelaide, Hawthorn, North Melbourne and Sydney games. Even with personnel out, the way either the players or the gameplan occurred were disasters.
When we took possession in D50, we had nobody making space to kick it to, so it would always turn over to the other team.
We had nobody making space, because when we got possession, there appeared to be no set gameplan/structure for players to go from X to Y. When we switched in the backline to the open side of the ground, NOBODY ran to that side until the defender was in possession and had been waiting for someone to do something.
There were players who were more happy to sit outside packs and let others do the work. Bryce Gibbs was the chief offender.
When a player was under pressure as the ball tried to carry and handball the football along the D50 flanks, there was nobody or a 2/3 on 1 contest up the field. A blind hospital ball (or worse, OOF) would occur and result in a turnover.
Whenever the opposition caused a turnover, their players understood what they had to do, and committed themselves to their instructions.
The modus operandi was clear:
- Opposition teams played to a set, flexible structure, and ALL of their players regardless of the pecking order committed to it - NO LAZY footballers
- Carlton played to a strength system. Get the ball to the more talented players where you can, and let them "do their thing". That means Yarran get the ball and run and dodge 3 guys. Scotland kick it 50 metres even if its to no Carlton player. Tuohy if you get the ball, just try to do something. Hope like hell it gets into the hands of Murphy, Judd or Carrazzo.
Carlton played more often as individuals and got smashed by teams that were talented to stick to their gameplan and harass Carlton out of their talent. When the ball turned over and we were caught "out of position" (which often was no position at all), there was not enough players willing to commit the other way - LAZY footballers.
This was evident in each of those victories, and by 1/4 you knew how cooked the team was that day.
The team didn't commit as a team. The instructions appeared to be based on individualism. Why? Because the same thing occurred for an entire game.
The times Carlton did win is where the individual brilliance combined with open space, and a higher intensity to not be lazy, allowed the individuals to win the day.
This is in stark contrast to last year where there was more determination.
That says that something is broken between players and coach/committee.
And that's why it can't continue.