Anencephalic wrote:
So let me get this right.
Sack a coach after the result of one game? Since when does one swallow make a summer? Hey Collingwood lost to us by bigger margins and more often. Should they sack Buckley?
Sacking Ratten now would be giving Mick Malthouse huge leverage over us. Basically he would be the only option and he would then have Carlton over a barrel. His saying that it now or never and that Ratts should be sacked first would WEAKEN Carlton. Not to mention financially Carlton would be weakened dramatically.
I would hope the quick fix mentality has gone. Hopefully Sticks is true to his word and it is going to be a well considered process at the end of the season. If we are going to appoint MM instead of Ratts it would have to be a month after the end of the season for it to at least have the appearance of proper due process.
When did he say that? He said a review, nothing about a process. He hasn't even said we need a new coach yet.
Who says Ratten was sacked over one game? IMO he was gone long ago.
Who says Malthouse hasn't already done a deal? Maybe we are Malthouses only option and we have him over a barrel.
If you have any idea regarding Club finances you will know that this is not a backward step.
This is not about a quick fix. This is about getting the right person. The club now believes Ratten wasn't it. What do they do? Keep him anyway.
Too many people are making too many conclusions without knowing what is going on.
Let it play out. Things may well be going better than you think.