Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:17 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
mikkey wrote:
Agree with Ryan2000. I was not happy. Looked very much like against Swans with bad structure and no creating options by working without the ball. Lions were crap and had a side in with 11 players less than 50 games.
Forward line was much better. I think we have the power forward we need who can take the grabs. Levi just has to learn how to kick straight. Happy with McInnes' job on JB. Garlett better again. Midfield just too slow to spread and creating options. Delivery woeful both by foot and hand. Good 3rd qtr, but thats it.

Assume it looked better on TV - but live when you can see whats happening... woeful.


We had 8 players with less than 50 games, , but hey don't let the facts get in the way of a good story :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:21 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Agree that we were awful. A decent side would have smashed us. A percentage boost would have been handy but we only just did enough to win against a pretty poor side.

One of Gibbs better games for the year. I didn't think his impact matched his possession count and good sides won't allow him that space but it's a start. Casboult was good as well before tiring. That ball drop is appalling though. Even the banana he kicked was terrible. Gripped it overhand and dropped it from almost chest height. Curnow did a decent job as a stopper I thought but disposal was poor again. Good to see Garlett hit the scoreboard. Hopefully that gives him some more confidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:23 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4500
Location: Perth
Very, very unconvincing but a win is a win.

No excuses for them to make us look third rate early. Lucky they wasted chances throughout the game.

Midfield doesn't work hard enough defensively. Can work very hard going forward though.

We continue to do the basics poorly. Shepherds, talk, hitting targets either by foot or hand under little pressure, handballing to someone under immediate pressure (curnow twice :mad: ) and general accountability to name a few.

Thought kruez, murph, garlett and carrots were good. Walks and Waite not bad either. Levi promising but gee whiz someone teach him how to kick.

Not all that impressed with Gibbs to be honest. Last qtr goes one handed for that mark, butters up by going to ground and conceding a HTB. Then that shot for goal later on. Seriously, wtf? Not good enough for someone of his supposed class.

Need to lift a few cogs to have any chance next week.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:49 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
I'm happy 3 of my favorites are showing a bit in Bolt, McInnes and RoK. All keepers if we want to improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:51 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4628
Location: lygon street
one of the worst games I've been to. Just awful to watch. Our skill overall are terrible. And what I really noticed tonight is how crap we are collectively at picking up a ball below our knees.

I thought Gibbs was good tonight but its hard to stop whipping a whipping boy for some it would seem.

How Levi has been on the list for the best part of 4 years and his kicking action has not been addressed is beyond me. It truly is an indictment on the coaches. Just horrible to watch. He can take a good grab though and contests really well.

Bell is a bull and has a future. O'Keefe did really well in the short time he was on.

Watson was average and looks like he has lost some of the confidence he had started to build. Hopefully another week might see him regain a bit of touch.

Was good to see the Sticks Kernahan helicopter make a re-appearance. Not Kreuzer's best effort but at least it went straight!!

Waite's marking was good, particularly on those fast searching leads up the flanks. Offers that link that we've sorely missed for much of the year.

Garlett seems to have turned the corner after having a pretty ordinary year to date.

I just hope we can click next week and @#$%&! up the bombers season for good.

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:04 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 135
ryan2000 wrote:
Am I the only one that thought that was woeful????

28 - 27 in terms of scoring shots! Brisbane being woeful in front of goal made us look better than we actually were!

- still crap disposal
- still piss fart around
- still let teams get the run through the corridor.
- still push up the ground too much!

We started the game like we didn't really give a toss and we ended the game the same way!

If it weren't for that 10min passage in the 3rd qtr we would have been stuffed.

Sorry. Don't mean to sound like a sour puss but honestly - if we gave a !@#$%& tonight we would have won by 60+ points minimum!!!


Tanking ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:04 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 135
ryan2000 wrote:
Am I the only one that thought that was woeful????

28 - 27 in terms of scoring shots! Brisbane being woeful in front of goal made us look better than we actually were!

- still crap disposal
- still piss fart around
- still let teams get the run through the corridor.
- still push up the ground too much!

We started the game like we didn't really give a toss and we ended the game the same way!

If it weren't for that 10min passage in the 3rd qtr we would have been stuffed.

Sorry. Don't mean to sound like a sour puss but honestly - if we gave a !@#$%& tonight we would have won by 60+ points minimum!!!


Tanking ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Only saw the first quarter and a bit so can't comment on the game. Apart from Levi's kicking, which I got to see early on. Two misses both gettable.

I thought Watson started off OK. Interesting to read that someone thought he was lacking in confidence. i will watch the replay tomorrow when it gets posted on Bigpond TV. LKooking forward to it.

I'm batching for a week so I can connect the big screen to the computer and watch Carlton games all week. I might start with this win and then go back to the 1968 GF and work my way forward.

If Richmond beats Essendon* we make the eight. It is really the only game that we can't control. We have to beat them well next week, go for percentage against the Suns and then all we have to do is beat the aints if Richmond does the right thing.

GO TIGERS!

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:33 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18061
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:


Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:07 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Blue Vain wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:


Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.


Its another tag though BV :roll:


Seriously, some of you guys need need to get over your obsession with how many 'tags' we employ.

Our midfield has been terrible in terms of accountability at times and you have to recognise there are different stages of making our players responsible for their opponant.

There aren't many pure tags in footy anymore. Most of the time its be responsible for your opponant, but when we have the ball work off him and provide an option. This is more a 'run with' role. Other players benefit from having someone take them to the ball, others raise their game with the responsibility they're given to run with an opposition star.

To describe Carrazzo's role as a tagger shows a pretty limited understanding of how footy works.

There are some serious flaws in how we play football at times. Some of them relate to coaching strategy, but some of the dumb decision making our players are capable of is embarassing. Having two players run to the man with ball, letting a free player run ahead, having 6-7 within a couple of metres of the contest while their players are outside that bubble, lack of intensity when we tackle in close allowing them to break free.

A few other things that stood out
- how flat we were early
- rotating KP players off the bench, why does Simon White need a break half way through the first quarter?
- our insistence on going sideways or backwards to pick out an easy option in our forward half, giving them time to set up a zone, makes it very difficult for us to find an option and score.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:10 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Blue Vain wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:


Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.


Voice of reason.

Same reason TBird can't get a run, Levi is doing his job and can ruck.

Unfortunately we can't just "let them play" because it makes the game a shoot out and that style doesn't hold up when the game is hot.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:


Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.


Its another tag though BV :roll:


Seriously, some of you guys need need to get over your obsession with how many 'tags' we employ.

Our midfield has been terrible in terms of accountability at times and you have to recognise there are different stages of making our players responsible for their opponant.

There aren't many pure tags in footy anymore. Most of the time its be responsible for your opponant, but when we have the ball work off him and provide an option. This is more a 'run with' role. Other players benefit from having someone take them to the ball, others raise their game with the responsibility they're given to run with an opposition star.

To describe Carrazzo's role as a tagger shows a pretty limited understanding of how footy works.

There are some serious flaws in how we play football at times. Some of them relate to coaching strategy, but some of the dumb decision making our players are capable of is embarassing. Having two players run to the man with ball, letting a free player run ahead, having 6-7 within a couple of metres of the contest while their players are outside that bubble, lack of intensity when we tackle in close allowing them to break free.

A few other things that stood out
- how flat we were early
- rotating KP players off the bench, why does Simon White need a break half way through the first quarter?
- our insistence on going sideways or backwards to pick out an easy option in our forward half, giving them time to set up a zone, makes it very difficult for us to find an option and score.


Good post Brad, particularly the first part. We don't get to play any game on our terms, nobody does. If we'd let our midfield play wide of each other the game becomes a lottery.

On the last part it can be difficult for us , particularly at Etihad, to play quickly because our disposal simply struggles . Sides are shutting down our options so when it's frenetic we often dont see the one option that's open and if we do see it we miss it anyway.

Still shouldn't be doing the chip chip shit but we needed to move at a more deliberate pace. Which we did sometimes.

Plus brizzy did have a crack.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Blue Vain wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.

Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4. :fight:



Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.


Couldn't go, so obviously raw stats don't tell the story this time. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6460
Hey Brad how are you going.
Watched a real game of footy last night
Had little interest in the game last night and from all reports it was shit

I wacked 25 on Jack to win the Brownlow at 250 to 1 so had a passing interest in this game

Watching Jack closely this year he runs incredibly hard both ways
So didevery othe mid in that game

Our midfieders dont
No flower excuses
Our mids just cruize
All of them

And its not been addressed

We are so far behind the top teams
This is one just area


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
keogh wrote:
Hey Brad how are you going.
Watched a real game of footy last night
Had little interest in the game last night and from all reports it was shit

I wacked 25 on Jack to win the Brownlow at 250 to 1 so had a passing interest in this game

Watching Jack closely this year he runs incredibly hard both ways
So didevery othe mid in that game

Our midfieders dont
No !@#$%& excuses
Our mids just cruize
All of them

And its not been addressed

We are so far behind the top teams
This is one just area


How would you know, you just said you didn't watch us?

Or are you basing it on previous games you haven't watched?

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Glad you enjoyed the Swans game keogh. They're going well.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35973
Location: Half back flank
Blue Sombrero wrote:
I'm batching for a week so I can connect the big screen to the computer and watch porn all week.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:03 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6460
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Glad you enjoyed the Swans game keogh. They're going well.



Yep
and Collingwood went well as well
Without Swann
and Pennders had a shocker
But hey wasnt it Sticks and Ratts who said that we were a top 4 side this year.

Why is it that guys like Blair and Beames step up

And we dont

Is it
recruiting
fitness
injury management
poor structures
poor coaching
Cimm I will take assume that if just about every post says the game didnt reach great heights then it was shit

Brad
The club needs a total review from top to bottom
Reckon Sticks will be in charge of that given his track record
Nah

We are average
I havent been to see us play since the Essendon* game because I am sick of us being average


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
keogh wrote:
Brad
The club needs a total review from top to bottom


Have I ever disagreed with this?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group