Blue Vain wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
Curnow 12 touches v Bell 18 and a goal. FFS, it's Judd for Curnow isn't it? Ellard for Mitch if he's suspended, hope there's nothing in it though as Mitch can dish out some useful pain this week.
Really, really want to see Bell v these pricks after what happened Rd 4.

Curnows job on Black was instrumental in us getting across the line. He shouldnt be going anywhere.
Its another tag though BV
Seriously, some of you guys need need to get over your obsession with how many 'tags' we employ.
Our midfield has been terrible in terms of accountability at times and you have to recognise there are different stages of making our players responsible for their opponant.
There aren't many pure tags in footy anymore. Most of the time its be responsible for your opponant, but when we have the ball work off him and provide an option. This is more a 'run with' role. Other players benefit from having someone take them to the ball, others raise their game with the responsibility they're given to run with an opposition star.
To describe Carrazzo's role as a tagger shows a pretty limited understanding of how footy works.
There are some serious flaws in how we play football at times. Some of them relate to coaching strategy, but some of the dumb decision making our players are capable of is embarassing. Having two players run to the man with ball, letting a free player run ahead, having 6-7 within a couple of metres of the contest while their players are outside that bubble, lack of intensity when we tackle in close allowing them to break free.
A few other things that stood out
- how flat we were early
- rotating KP players off the bench, why does Simon White need a break half way through the first quarter?
- our insistence on going sideways or backwards to pick out an easy option in our forward half, giving them time to set up a zone, makes it very difficult for us to find an option and score.