Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
So how are we going to do this.
Fremantle Harvey/Lyon style. Sack Ratts, and then magically appoint MM 30 minutes later, or have Ratten stand down and go through a mock process before appointing MM just to make it look like this wasn't something that has been in the wings since June?
What difference does it make?....
To Ratten - none. To the club in a PR sense - something.
Just curious as obviously this is playing out behind the scenes different to how it is in public. Whilst this is nothing new in football, I was just interested as to how the club plans to handle what should be a delicate situation, and what will be the inevitable media frenzy.
We all might have the luxury of TC, + other forums to get a blow by blow account of the last 2 months, but the majority of supporters would be clueless and are more than likely still under the impression that Ratts is coaching for his career in the next 4 weeks. Dayne Zorko said so, Robbo think's it, Barrett thinks he should stay, so therefore it is all true.....
I mentioned to my old man that it seems that Malthouse had agreed to a 3 year contract, so his first response was "I'll have to watch 360 tonight and see what they have to say" as if this was something that all took place over 1 phone call this afternoon and is now common knowlege!
Fremantle had to deal with the whole "did Lyon stab Harvey in the back", "was he deep in talks whilst still a St Kilda coach?" and Essendon* with the conflicting stories of when Thompson began talks about joining the Hird regime etc.
Considering that Ratten is still under contract, MM's constant denial and refusal to discuss coaching jobs as respect to the person contracted to the position, and Sticks' hardly stellar performances in the past when under media fire, they'd all better be ready.
That's all.