Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:56 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 307 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7208
Right now, T-bird is our best contested mark. Waite hasn't been able to so far this season.

tbh, there's room for both Tbird and waite in the side. Waite would be best suited to a Dustin Fletcher -- minus the penetrating kick -- role in defense. Might save his body for a season or two too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:10 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Yeah, I was never thinking Waitey, instead of T Bird.
Would like to see both in.
more so, I'd like to see us win..so, hopefully we'll get the right choices out there.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Sydney Blue wrote:
ianh wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
why not leave T Bird in, and get some continuity?

he is solid, and I think we treat him like crap.


Good question, he clearly is on the outer with the powers that be, for mine no way he should get the chop this week but wouldn't be surprised if the MC thought otherwise.



7 kicks 4 marks 1 tackle will be the reason he gets drop
Simply not enough output for a lead a forward
Forget the 2 goals one was a gift from Yarran and bad marking by the tiges and silly Rance gifted him the othet


I'm a T-Bird fan, on balance he's had a raw deal with the MC, but this pretty much sums it up. If not for Waite being available, pretty sure he'd be playing, though.

Like the inclusion of White, too, gives the backline a bit of an X factor and it appears from recent NB reports that he's also done well when played as a midfielder. :eek: . Maybe he's taken his game to another level?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:29 am
Posts: 915
Hope white gets a crack. Always thought he looked the goods


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
Hammertime22 wrote:
Hope white gets a crack. Always thought he looked the goods


I found it quite interesting that Simon has been used through the midfield in his last few outings for NB. I thought that was quite fascinating as I didn't see him as an option through there although he does move well on the field

Reports have been quite positive on his output too so it would be interesting to see how that translates in the seniors

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
marciblue wrote:
Hammertime22 wrote:
Hope white gets a crack. Always thought he looked the goods


I found it quite interesting that Simon has been used through the midfield in his last few outings for NB. I thought that was quite fascinating as I didn't see him as an option through there although he does move well on the field

Reports have been quite positive on his output too so it would be interesting to see how that translates in the seniors


He played in the backline for Northern all last week.

Would be a great bonus if he turned into a good hard midfielder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:56 pm
Posts: 2277
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Stamos wrote:
FlipMode2 wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if Thornton was dropped, though I wouldn't be happy with it.

He did some really good things last week and simply doesn't deserve to be dropped. He offers us more than White in terms of versatility and is more likely to perform than Waite who despite playing a ripper VFL game last week, hasn't played an AFL game since round 7.


Got to pull you up on a couple of things.

Waite is very consistent when he is on the park, and his best is a lot better than T-bird's.

Also, regardless of who is better, White is the more versatile player. He can legitimately play in defense.

Thornton did some really good things against the Tigs, but he only got 7 touches (and that wonderful tap) against a pretty average defense. I don't think his work rate is good enough.


I agree that Waite is the better and more consistent player when fit, but I don't think he'd offer a whole lot more than TBird coming off a 12 week lay off with a pretty severe back injury. Time will tell, when and if he's selected over Thornton.

Thornton may have only had the 7 disposals but as BKB pointed out, he certainly wasn't poor. He played a vital role in getting us over the line last week, Definitely not poor enough to deserve being dropped regardless of who is fit and ready to come in. It's basically 'play a good game and you'll probably still get dropped for a bigger name' is the message you send to the younger ones.

Disagree on White. Again as BKB pointed out, Thornton is quite good in defense, certainly at the very least on par with White. It's up forward where I believe TBird offers us a bit more with his contested marking and reliable kick for goal. I have no problem with White coming in, so long as it's not TBird making way for him.

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 577
White would provide alot more than Davies does. Surely after his game last week he'll be dropped. We would of won by 6 goals if he didn't play


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Blue Sombrero wrote:
jim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
I think Levi will need to have a break. I'm just not sure he'll be able to keep up with the hectic pace the Swans work at, particularly at the back.

I would bring in Warnock and have Kruez and Waite provide the forward targets .
No more rucks playing long periids of time in the KP. It was found not to work that well so let's not go back to it. Play Waite and Thornton across HF with Casboult at FF with some ruck relief.

Your hobby horse.
Hampson did work. He got injured.
Now we have others available so let them have a go.
Didn't work in the KP. You know it, I know it.Hampson is a ruckman not a KP forward. As we saw ruckman rarely translate to that role. Your 3 ruckman idea didn't wotk.....as expected. Told you. Saw why it was a hobby horse. Play forwards in KP roles, it works better structure-wise. Mpw we work with one ruckman as a pinch-hitter as it's working better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I don't disagree that much Jim. I just think Big Levi has struggled with the pace of the last two weeks, he's been serviceable, but not great.

I think the Swans game will be 10% faster and harder and I'm concerned he may not keep up.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Have been thinking that too. (re Levi) I love what the big fella is bringing, but he did look pretty sore at times, in the last game.
Always liked Simon White when I've seen him play, and the reports from NB are v. positive.
Davies and or, Dale out, maybe just for this week?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24639
Location: Kaloyasena
Braithy wrote:
Right now, T-bird is our best contested mark. Waite hasn't been able to so far this season.




Last year at this time Setanta O'hAilpin was our best contested mark - and it didnt do him any good in the end either.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
MC got it right last week. Let';s hope they can do it again.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25225
Location: Bondi Beach
Ridiculous to suggest that 3 rucks can't work at Carlton when our experiment included:

1. Warnock who didn't have a preseason and is still struggling to make the team as the 2nd ruck. Unfit and lacks strength.
2. Kreuzer....everybody knows he's not right, and hasn't been since his knee reco...and hip issues.
3. Hampson who is learning the caper (and showing good signs imo)...as are the players who are delivering to an unknown, within a game plan which is questionable.

Of course it's bound to fail at Carlton with the abovementioned going on. In that state we shouldn't use the 3 ruckmen whilst they are not pulling their weight...and that applies to all players.

I'm happy either way, just as long as it works. I would like to judge the 3 rucks when they are all fit and firing...then judge them.

At the moment Collingwoods KPF's Cloke and Dawes aren't playing like we expect KPF's to work, so do we say KPF's don't work? No we don't. We suggest they are out of form, or the players upfield have lost their mojo.

If we have the KP's fwds who are better than the 3 rucks then we should go for it. If we are better with a smaller mobile forwardline, by all means go with that, but if the rucks are fit and firing and dangerous, they will either mark the ball, or get to it to feed the crumbers, and if they are a better option than anything else we can muster, then we have to give it a go.

I'm sure we went with 3 ruckmen because we had Waite, walker, Casboult, Mitchell, Rowe, White, Henderson...all big KP's out injured. We also had Murphy and Carrazzo out and all the smalls other than Betts seemd out of form. I reckon it didn't matter who we played whilst we were lacking confidence and endeavour, we still would have lost...not because of the 3 rucks, but because of injury, form and confidence.

Agree, right now we shouldn't go with 3 ruckmen because one is out for the rest of the season and the other 2 are suspect in terms of fitness. Just sayin.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21542
Location: North of the border
AGRO wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Right now, T-bird is our best contested mark. Waite hasn't been able to so far this season.




Last year at this time Setanta O'hAilpin was our best contested mark - and it didnt do him any good in the end either.


Have you lost your memory

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Sydney Blue wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Right now, T-bird is our best contested mark. Waite hasn't been able to so far this season.




Last year at this time Setanta O'hAilpin was our best contested mark - and it didnt do him any good in the end either.


Have you lost your memory

2011 season contested marks per game.

Jarrad Waite - 2.3
Setanta O'hAilpin - 1.9
Michael Jamison - 1.4
Shaun Hampson - 1.2
Bret Thornton - 1.1
Mark Austin - 1.0
Matthew Kreuzer - 1.0
Nick Duigan - 1.0
Lachlan Henderson - 0.8
Andrew Walker - 0.7

Waite's last game last year was on July 10.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19420
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
B: A.Joseph M.Jamison S.White
HB: Z.Tuohy A.McInnes C.Yarran
C: K.Simpson A.Carrazzo H.Scotland
HF: E.Curnow J.Waite D.Armfield
F: E.Betts L.Casboult J.Garlett
Foll: M.Kreuzer M.Murphy B.Gibbs
INT: (from) T.Bell, A.Collins, M.Davies, D.Ellard, K.Lucas, B.McLean, B.Thornton

IN: Waite, Simpson, White, Lucas, Ellard
OUT: Dale, Duigan

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
Cheers Effes.
No complaints at this stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
:clap: excellent team. a shame Robbo couldn't make it yet.

hmmm...Bloody hope this means that Brock is in...!!

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Last edited by bluegirl72 on Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
I'd play Bell, Davies, McLean and probably Collins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 307 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group