frank dardew wrote:
4th chook I referred to that analysis done by the AFL rather than any other because I thought it had merit and would be more objective than fans doing their own analysis l consider that both have outperformed us this year with a similar amount of injuries not sure who they had in our best 22- bald fact - west coast have won 3 more games and the bush 4 more than us
We are 12th with little prospect of finals looking at it objectively both west coast and collingwood will play finals
and that was my point - it's typical light media 'analysis' - As I stated in my previous post, we have actually had a lot more long term injuries than the pies/WC once you consider the entire list. That is a fact - if you believe otherwise feel free to go through the injury reports of all 3 teams for the season.
The point is, that having your depth players available to come into the team and contribute is a very important component to having a successful season. Do you disagree with the statement that we've had a lot more long term injuries to non-first 22 players than either WC and pies? - If so, make an effort to state why you believe this to be the case (rather than I read a shallow media piece so it must be true)
rowe, mitchell, casboult, davies, white, bell & ROK - all mature bodied, non-established in first 22 players and all that might have been expected to contribute to the team at some point this year. Do you disagree with this?
Or perhaps you are suggesting that long term injuries to rowe, mitchell, casboult, davies, white, bell & ROK are all useless because they've never done much/never will amount to anything and would not have been able to provide any meaningful contribution to the team this year had they been not had injury interrupted seasons? (as some people seem to suggest around here)
Or perhaps you are suggesting that carlton having 9 long term injuries to non-22 players (including bray/buckley) is the same as WC and collingwood having 3-5 medium-long term injuries to non-first 22 players?
frank dardew wrote:
Injuries are a contributing factor but not a predominant factor - given only about 3 people on our list mclean collins betts it could be argued could lay claim to improving this year I would think that would indicate why there has been a diminution of output this year
What about
- watson?
- mcinness?
- hampson? (taking contested marks, hitting the scoreboard etc)
- robinson? (statistically the same as last year but in the absence of murphy/carazzo - suggested by some as possibility for BnF)
- bower? (had a shit 2011)
You could even mount a cases for
- ellard (less games but has averaged 5+ more possessions/game 14.6-19.

- joseph? (11 games thus far, 11 in total last year, will play more games - slight improvement in game stats)
- curnow (12 games thus far, 12 in total last year, will play more games - slight improvement in game stats)
- armfield (15 games thus far, 15 in total last year, will play more games - slight improvement in game stats)
frank dardew wrote:
How is the performance of the following senior players this year (who havent been out injured too often this year) judd scotland gibbs jamison gartlett russell thorton curnow joseph compared to last year
So lets address them
Judd - do you forget shoulder issues from pre-season? or reports that he was carrying an niggle for part of the year/desperately needed the bye? (take your pick - news reports, rattens press conference, rumours here). Furthermore, has he really been that down? (given the extra load from carazzo/murphy absences)
Judd - up until round 16 (2011 v 2012)
games with < 20 possessions - 2011 - 1, 2012 - 2
games with < 25 possessions - 2011 - 6, 2012 - 6
games with >30 possessions - 2011 - 5, 2012 - 4
Lets not forget that Judd is currently having 4 weeks off (so will return with a fresh body IF we can push for finals) - compare that to last year where he finished the year with 3 sub 20 possession games in our last 4 games for the season.
Scotland - wondering what you expected from his this year? - he is actually averaging more possessions (+1.1/games) and tackles (+0.9/game)
Gibbs - yup he is down on last year. Only slightly though. He is also playing a different role and has been asked to fill a lot more gaps due to injuries in the back half.
jamison - A huge drop off from last year and I wouldnt have mind seeing him out of the team on occasion. But I'm wondering whether you'd forgotten about his back (pre-season, couldnt play until rd 3) and the reported ongoing shoulder issues
garlett - A huge drop off from last year and probably should have been dropped at one point. Speculation but perhaps fatherhood at such a young age has had an impact on his preparation for the game?
Russell - Dropped off from last year a fair bit.
Thornton - dropped 3 times this season so down from last year though its worth mentioning that last time he was apparently 'dropped' he was actually out injured with a glut strain (missed several weeks in the ants as well).
Curnow - statistically the same (slight improvement) and will play more games than last year. Was great at the start of last year, then rubbish post shoulder.
Joseph - statistically the same (slight improvement) and will play more games than last year.
frank dardew wrote:
Before they were injured was the form of waite yarran knockers simpson better than last year - maybe murph and hendo before they were injured were as good as last year
waite - yes, he was as good as last year. In fact, he was arguably better this year than last. Is actually up in possessions (+.7/game, only the 3rd time in 10 seasons with 15+/game), marks (+1.4/game - career high 8.3/game) and goals (+0.5/game, again career high). In 2011, waite kicked 3 goals once and it took hi til rd 15 to do so - in 2012, he did it twice in the early games (bags of 3 & 5).
Yarran - his first 2 games were good actually. In rd 3 & 4 he had 13 & 12 possession games before succumbing to a toe injury. Whether he has been good compared to last year would depend on whether you take into account the corresponding period last year (first 3-4 rds, which included a 4 possessions game) and the exact point as to when his toe issues first arose, rd 3 or 4, how far through the game etc). I dont think its unreasonable to say that he was comparable to last year
warnock - actually STARTED the year injured with double shoulder ops and didnt resume in the VFL until several rds in... - I dont think its unreasonable to suggest that having both shoulders operated on might affect a ruckman?
simpson - was statistically identical when compared to last year (-0.1 possessions, -0.7 marks, +0.2 goals, same tackles - all/game basis). So again comparable.
murphy
2012 (pre-injury) - first 7 games he averaged 28.9 possessions/game (includes 1 game of 17 possessions, 2011 average was 29.1), had the same goal average as 2011 (take behinds into account and 2012 has a higher shots of goal average) but was down by 0.5 tackles/game. Again, comparable
hendo - has first 5 games of the year (15 possessions, 6 marks) were better than his 2011 averages (11.5 & 4.7 respectively). He then struggled for the next 3 games (drops to 9 possession, 4 mark average) before finally missing with injury. Do you think it might be remotely possible that he was carrying an injury during those 3 games? Even if you took those 3 games into account, henderson has actually performed better than last year (+1.5 possessions, +0.6 mark averages compared to 2011)
So Frank, in light of the above perhaps you should consider reassessing our injuries and the performances of certain players?