frank dardew wrote:
If we keep blaming injuries or this is used as an excuse - the proper forensic analysis wont be done and those systemic issues you identified and others both in terms of game pan and personnel wont be rectified
So how about you make an effort to do a proper forensic analysis?
As of the 16/7/12 (approx rd 15) - injuries to depth players
carlton
- rowe - unavailable ALL year
- mitchell - has only been back in the ants for about a month or so
- casboult, davies, white - unavailable for most of the year with injuries
- bell and ROK didnt play in ants until mid may due to injures
- buckley missed about 2 mths of the season with a finger injury
- bray missed 2+ mths due to a shoulder injury
Thats 9 non-first 22 players that had missed 50+% of the season to long term injuries - 7 of which might have made reasonable contributions to the team this year (exceptions being buckley & bray). Depending on who you have as in your best 22, you could potentially add warnock (50+% season injured) & thornton (approx 25%) depending on whether the article considered them best 22 or not (clearly thornton not)
Comparison teams that are often quoted
Pies depth injuries (16/7/12)
Josh Thomas, mcaffer, farmer, Cribbin & O'keefe as having missed significant time (> 1/4 season). The article you reference to actually considers mcaffer and okeefe as first 22 players - in which case, the pies have only had 3 depth players with longer term injuries
WC 'depth' injuries (16/7/12)
Dalziell (50%+), ash smith (approx 50%) - so 2 depth players with long term injuries
So Frank, are you still prepared to sit there with a straight face and claim that WC and collingwood have had similar injuries to carlton this year?