Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:10 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Yes, the SEN'ers think it is bad,but haven't factored in possible trade moves.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
The only way this news will please me is if he's signed on for no more than 250k

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
bluegirl72 wrote:
Yes, the SEN'ers think it is bad,but haven't factored in possible trade moves.


Fair to say Cam Mooney doesn't understand much apart from "see ball, get ball" .

Of course that's shortly followed by "kick point".

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
We now have currency to trade with ;-)


Last edited by The Normal One on Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Hornet wrote:
The only way this news will please me is if he's signed on for no more than 250k

yep. A thousand bucks per centimeter would be good.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
cimm1979 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Yes, the SEN'ers think it is bad,but haven't factored in possible trade moves.

Fair to say Cam Mooney doesn't understand much apart from "see ball, get ball" .

Of course that's shortly followed by "kick point".


Cam Mooney can't add anything other than to discuss the good old years at Geelong.
Largely a commentator only given given credibility by his on-air cohorts.

Securing Warnock was a prudent move.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Nah, should have let him walk. Good one Cam

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:00 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:08 pm
Posts: 293
Location: Behind Enemy Lines - SA
aramari wrote:
I'd look at trading him if we were confident that Rowe / Casboult / late draft smokie could do the job as second ruck next season, and if he finished the season in good form. A late first round pick plus our pick 12ish would give a good position to get someone like Boak or Caddy, or get two good kids at the draft.


I guess that it's fair to say two genuine ruckmen on the list is fine if we have Casboult / Rowe / Mitchell playing, but until they are genuine AFL players themselves, the club cant gamble on releasing a ruck of Warnock's caliber.

As some have already said, signing him up again is the wise thing to do. One might say it is 'playing the percentages' considering injuries to rucks are common (just look at our list alone over the last 2-3 years).

_________________
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
cimm1979 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Yes, the SEN'ers think it is bad,but haven't factored in possible trade moves.


Fair to say Cam Mooney doesn't understand much apart from "see ball, get ball" .

Of course that's shortly followed by "kick point".



ouch! :razz:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
How many good games has he given us in his first 4 years? He has played 37 in total for us and about half of those weren't much good. He has has been on very big dough - $400k was the figure bandied about. How does he get three more years on the back of that? If we didn't have Big K then maybe, but how can Warnock play anywhere else but first ruck? We lost Jacobs because we recruited Warnock and his output has been so far behind Jacobs its not funny. We can't have three rucks in the firsts and we have holes in our side that might be addressed if we trade one of our rucks. I was hoping it was Warnock who would be traded. And as for how many rucks you need on your list, you neeed one young developing ruck, a battling tough guy and a good first ruck and maybe a pinch hitter, you don't need three guys who are first rucks and all about the same age.

Unfortunately I think Ratts thinks Warnock is J Madden - he's not and footy has changed since the Madden years.


Last edited by gerry atric on Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
DocSherrin wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Thank Goodness.
We need 3 ruckman on the list.
I cannot believe people are sooking that we signed him.
This place sometimes is quite unbelievable.


This.


That :thumbsup:


Edit :oops: That's what happens when you post without reading the whole thread :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: The Clinic across the road.
Very popular with the boys

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
gerry atric wrote:
How many good games has he given us in his first 4 years? He has played 37 in total for us and about half of those weren't much good. He has has been on very big dough - $400k was the figure bandied about. How does he get three more years on the back of that? If we didn't have Big K then maybe, but how can Warnock play anywhere else but first ruck? We lost Jacobs because we recruited Warnock and his output has been so far behind Jacobs its not funny. We can't have three rucks in the firsts and we have holes in our side that might be addressed if we trade one of our rucks. I was hoping it was Warnock who would be traded. And as for how many rucks you need on your list, you neeed one young developing ruck, a battling tough guy and a good first ruck and maybe a pinch hitter, you don't need three guys who are first rucks and all about the same age.

Unfortunately I think Ratts thinks Warnock is J Madden - he's not and footy has changed since the Madden years.


Some very good finals. Can't argue that. His types tend to really develop in the 2nd half of their careers. Don't knock the value of a decent 6'11" ruckman over time, they usually end with with terrific careers. Problem is too many think "now". If we did trade him and he really did well the same people would bag the club saying how dumb it was to get rid of him. That's how it usually works isn't it? There's a reason one doesn't take 50% of supporters of any club, on any forum, seriously. Think in small terms.

Harry took 5 years to be any good too. At times he was useless. 6th year just missed the Brownlow and never looked back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Jolly and Ottens Champs at 24+ .

He's good already and he WILL GET BETTER.

When he's fit everything works. He blocks and tackles, holds marks and kicks a loooooooong way.

Just got to be fit.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
gerry atric wrote:
Unfortunately I think Ratts thinks Warnock is J Madden - he's not and footy has changed since the Madden years.


If he can stay on the park I think he'll be every bit as good as Harry.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18652
Location: threeohfivethree
I'd love to see a list of all the rucks who ever played AFL and see how many of them were any good before about 25.

Warnock is 25.

Considering we've seen what he is capable of on more than a couple of occasions (including finals) what we need is for him to get fit and healthy, have a decent preseason and gain the sort of consistency that rucks usually find in the second half of their careers.

At which point he'll be coming up against a bunch of rucks in the first half of their careers.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
GWS wrote:
I'd love to see a list of all the rucks who ever played AFL and see how many of them were any good before about 25.

Warnock is 25.

Considering we've seen what he is capable of on more than a couple of occasions (including finals) what we need is for him to get fit and healthy, have a decent preseason and gain the sort of consistency that rucks usually find in the second half of their careers.

At which point he'll be coming up against a bunch of rucks in the first half of their careers.


Great post GWS.

If there was a graph which showed Age v Ruckmen becoming good, there'd be a sharp turn at 24-25. It takes that long.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Happy to keep him for the reasons mentioned....but 3 years?? :?

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Good move IMO.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 1649
Warnock is a quality ruckman when fit. He hasn't (as yet) justified the big dollars but we need quality players on the list. If we didn't sign, he'd walk and everyone would whinge that we got nothing.

His worth was shown in September last year. Happy to keep.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group