gerry atric wrote:
How many good games has he given us in his first 4 years? He has played 37 in total for us and about half of those weren't much good. He has has been on very big dough - $400k was the figure bandied about. How does he get three more years on the back of that? If we didn't have Big K then maybe, but how can Warnock play anywhere else but first ruck? We lost Jacobs because we recruited Warnock and his output has been so far behind Jacobs its not funny. We can't have three rucks in the firsts and we have holes in our side that might be addressed if we trade one of our rucks. I was hoping it was Warnock who would be traded. And as for how many rucks you need on your list, you neeed one young developing ruck, a battling tough guy and a good first ruck and maybe a pinch hitter, you don't need three guys who are first rucks and all about the same age.
Unfortunately I think Ratts thinks Warnock is J Madden - he's not and footy has changed since the Madden years.
Some very good finals. Can't argue that. His types tend to really develop in the 2nd half of their careers. Don't knock the value of a decent 6'11" ruckman over time, they usually end with with terrific careers. Problem is too many think "now". If we did trade him and he really did well the same people would bag the club saying how dumb it was to get rid of him. That's how it usually works isn't it? There's a reason one doesn't take 50% of supporters of any club, on any forum, seriously. Think in small terms.
Harry took 5 years to be any good too. At times he was useless. 6th year just missed the Brownlow and never looked back.