Cazzesman wrote:
By all means if you feel inclined to criticise the Board for anything off field then go your hardest but it is a long bow to draw to blame the Board for injuries, lack of form and generally uninspiring efforts.
For me, it's a very short bow from boardroom to onfield.
Shits me when boards make decisions that ultimately affect onfield performance, and when onfield performance suffers, the senior coach cops it and the board get off scot free.
The board appointed Ratts... the most junior of senior coaches. The board decided to surround him with a seriously inexperienced coaching panel. This would've set back both Ratten's and the list's development. The board reappointed Ratten recently, and are now (according to the Prez) thinking that maybe they screwed that up and are about to sack him.
The board is ultimately responsible for everything that happens at the club, onfield and off the field.
I would accept it if I believed our underperformance is purely the result of injuries. But you'd have to be blind not to see that we're weak in player development, because we just don't have the next tier of players coming up ready to go. The board have to wear that. And it's why injuries have affected us so badly... the replacements just aren't there.
Ultimately, the board are responsible for onfield success. Do you think that when Kernahan sacks Ratten he'll take responsibility for making the wrong call on Ratten on behalf of the board? Pig's arse he will. He'll talk of club legend, and great bloke, and injuries, and this is what happens in football, and heavy heart, and everything but the simple truth that sacking a bloke 18 months after re-appointing him clearly means you screwed up by re-appointing him.
And then he'll expect us to trust them to appoint the right guy, despite having screwed up in that area already.
Kernahan can sack Ratten, but who can sack Kernahan?
Kernahan told us his plan... multiple Premierships over the next few years. But he's given us a football department that doesn't work and a list that lacks Premiership qualities. Yet it's not his fault?
Ratten said we'd make top 4, and he'll get the arse because we won't.
Kernahan said we'd win flags, and we're expected to be happy to keep him there when we probably can't even make the 8?