Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:32 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
I reckon the culture of the Carlton playing list has one more coach sacking after Ratts left in it. They buckle too easy and blame others and us fans gobble up the unsaid excuses and buy into the uninspiring dull "sack the coach" line of thinking.

Touhy and Bootsma have the attitude. Its their generation that will bring change to things. The Fev era has messed the rest up.

Loved Fev though.


Maybe.. but Ratts should have been moved on by now and we would have been getting to the ultimate coach quicker.

Ratten cant plant seeds and harvest.

He isnt smart enough and doesnt know how.

the culture of the playing list is a reflection on the culture of the club.


Blaming Fev is ridiculous.. you need to look much higher up.....

Fev is a reflection of the culture of the club too...



Funny how people look at the hole in the donut and not the whole of the donut!!


Not blaming Fev. He is who he is. But players from the Fev era are messed up.

The club made the call to stick with him as he brought the crowds in and gave us all something to smile about during a dark time but it has come at a cost.

Still i would love to see us fight out this year and plant some seeds for the future. Folding for a rebuild and picks is not the answer in my opinion. Well it has been more or less proven it is not the answer. It will only fuel the demons that haunt our list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
I love the way people keep referring to "the dark time" or "the dark years" as though they were part of ancient history - or at least some time in the past. We are still IN the dark years....... unless you think that being 9th on the ladder half way through Round 12 (with Richmond about to go past us this afternoon) is somehow being in a new golden era.

#wakeup. #headinthesand.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
moshe25 wrote:
I love the way people keep referring to "the dark time" or "the dark years" as though they were part of ancient history - or at least some time in the past. We are still IN the dark years....... unless you think that being 9th on the ladder half way through Round 12 (with Richmond about to go past us this afternoon) is somehow being in a new golden era.

#wakeup. #headinthesand.



ah, but 9th is so much better than it was in the dark years.
I remember, we used to fit the whole club into a cardboard box.
We'd get up before we went to bed, to go to work...
ah...9th..the luxury!!

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2058
Michael Jezz wrote:
Synbad is largely right. Judd trade was the catalyst we needed but not a clear win. However I don't think most supporters understand we need a complete rebuild with draft picks and kids. I would rather the club did it properly and take 5 years than support a club with various false dawns over 30


This is what we have been doing since 2005. We have had plenty of early draft picks and time to rebuild for a shot at a premiership. There should be no excuses. Our biggest problem has been our coaching strategies and lack of player development. We have been relying on too few to win games and this is not sustainable. I don't know whether we need to go for a complete rebuild at this point in time, however, if we do there is no point if the two points mentioned above are not rectified.

People who are now questioning the Judd deal should remember what he has brought to the club. It amazes me that people can be so short sighted and simply base their opinion on his average 2012. It ain't his fault that the game plan (s) and depth within the team is suspect. In hindsight, if he had not been at Carlton over the last 5 years then we would be in worse shape (with Ratten).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:54 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.


:clap: :clap: yep.

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
moshe25 wrote:
I love the way people keep referring to "the dark time" or "the dark years" as though they were part of ancient history - or at least some time in the past. We are still IN the dark years....... unless you think that being 9th on the ladder half way through Round 12 (with Richmond about to go past us this afternoon) is somehow being in a new golden era.

#wakeup. #headinthesand.


Settle down Moshe25. They were dark days when we went to games hoping for fev to kick a few and nothing more.

It can be said that a year we don't win the flag is a dark year but these days don't compare to them dark days mid through the early to late 2000's .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
Blue Vain wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


Sorry I disagree. He may have dived on it, but it is quite clear by the footage that ball was in fact out. He did not have possession of the ball.

It was a completely wrong decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
Blue Boys wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


Sorry I disagree. He may have dived on it, but it is quite clear by the footage that ball was in fact out. He did not have possession of the ball.

It was a completely wrong decision.


Having possession is irrelevant. If you dive on it, you are responsible for clearing it out of the congestion. AJ may not have had his hands on the ball but Jamo was holding it into him.
The interpretation is simple and all the players should know it.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
its still a bullshit 'interpretation'

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
I agree. The player making the effort is penalised but the players should know. It was stupid not to concede the point.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
I concur

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
Having possession is irrelevant. If you dive on it, you are responsible for clearing it out of the congestion. AJ may not have had his hands on the ball but Jamo was holding it into him.
The interpretation is simple and all the players should know it.

My angst was mainly the inconsistency. There was an identical situation involving a WCE player a few minutes later that wasn't paid. If the AJ one was a free, fine, pay it every time not just sometimes. Not that I am allowing umps decisions to mask our performance....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
We need a clip to be put up. From my memory he grabbed the ball and was immediately tackled to the ground, no diving.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4941
Blue Vain wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


It astounds me that AJ gets picked ahead of Lucas and Russell.
Nearly every time he receives the ball under pressure he either coughs it up, loses his feet or gives away a free kick.
It reminds me of watching Peake and Eddy playing for St Kilda in 2010.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
We’ve gone from looking like a good side not really trying to an average side that is really trying. We’re a side that has lost confidence and belief. If the game’s close, I expect us to lose.

Terrific game and effort from Carrots. Real leader of the club. Probably should be captain.
Some wonderful defensive spoiling from Jamison.
Duigan’s form has been good the last 2 weeks.
Robbo had a terrific 2nd half. But not quite at the same level this year, after his break out season last year.
Enjoying Tuohy’s ongoing development. I reckon he’ll have a terrific career for us.
After a few good weeks, McLean didn’t really get near it.
Really happy that we’re getting games into Watson. He’s got some limitations. But doing well. And he also has some real weapons. His kicking is incredible. Nice that he can sit back inside 50 and be a distributor. Hopefully that means we can be a bit more attacking with players like Gibbs.
Not quite sure why we would be playing Joseph ahead of Bootsma. Bootsma’s form has been better. And surely we must be in development mode for the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
Blue Boys wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


Sorry I disagree. He may have dived on it, but it is quite clear by the footage that ball was in fact out. He did not have possession of the ball.

It was a completely wrong decision.

Unfortunate that the umpire was unsighted but as BV said, you dive on the ball then it's your responsibility to get rid of it. Every player knows or should know this by now.

Should've rushed the point...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
http://www.gameanalyser.afl.com.au/?round=1096&match=10341201&eventType=Goal&seek=2635&videoQuality=high

He didn't dive onto the ball, was in no position to knock it through and was swamped immediately.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:48 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
club29 wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
I love the way people keep referring to "the dark time" or "the dark years" as though they were part of ancient history - or at least some time in the past. We are still IN the dark years....... unless you think that being 9th on the ladder half way through Round 12 (with Richmond about to go past us this afternoon) is somehow being in a new golden era.

#wakeup. #headinthesand.


Settle down Moshe25. They were dark days when we went to games hoping for fev to kick a few and nothing more.

It can be said that a year we don't win the flag is a dark year but these days don't compare to them dark days mid through the early to late 2000's .

You ARE kidding, aren't you? Since the St Kilda game, these days compare a lot to "them dark days mid through the early to late 2000's". At least there was some hope in those days (Fev will kick 10 today, Walker will take MOTY, Murph will be good in the future, Gibbs will be a star, Juddy's great, etc, etc). I gotta tell ya, there is absolutely NOTHING I look forward to now when I go to the footy. In fact, although I barrack like crazy, I worry that if we win, the issues will get swept under the carpet.

I also hate that it comes down to any of:
- umpiring decisions;
- AJ's "mistakes";
- Juddy's form;
- etc, etc.

I'm not going to repeat myself, but suffice to say, I reckon we're just #Rearranging.Deck.Chairs.On.The.Titanic.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group