jim wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
When your seven goals down why do you let the other team have an extra man in defense?
Because if you keep matching them up, then they put another one back. And our forward line gets more and more crowded. And their forward line gets more and more open. Nearly all their goals came on the fast break out of defence into an open forward line. A number of them 'over the back'. I know we had to go offensive late in the game to give us a chance, but if we set up like that, teams are going to find it a lot easier to score against us, than we do against them.
We've struggled against flooding teams for a while. And after today, we're going to get a lot more of it. Need to play with a lot more skill and calmness and precision going forward. And not overattack. Leave a defensive wall, so teams don't simply kick it over our defence or slice through all the open space.
It's only a problem if they're no defensive pressure or intensity. They then run it out easily into open space. On the other hand, as per the "Press", if there is real defensively pressure they never get it out of defence. You choke them in their own defensive 50 until they break. Come down to attitude.
Wrong. So so very wrong. We play a suicidal form of the press, and we could serve ourselves so much better by tweaking it. If you're positioning yourselves only in the attacking part of the ground and the opposition don't have 15+ players their defensive side of the centre square, you're doing it wrong in AFL football.
In soccer you can set an offside trap; we need more numbers supporting that last line to ensure that there isn't a regular scenario where someone sends it 55-60m over the heads of the 1 or 2 defenders capable of making a play so they get an uncontested mark, or allow a simple forward surge.
It's accounting for half of our goals easily, and I don't buy into it being the by-product of the game style, merely a lack of capacity to implement a version that compensates for the tactical nuances of our game.